Archives

/Archive1

I noticed you added your name to the list of participants in WikiProject Magazines. We really appreciate your help! Here are some of the tasks we are currently working on:

1. Assessing the articles in Category:Unassessed magazine articles and Category:Unknown-importance magazine articles.
2. Expanding our top and high importance magazine articles.
3. Recruiting more members!

Thanks again for joining us, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 20:35, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Flashflash;, I've just made a userbox for WikiProject Magazines. Just add {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Magazines/Userbox}} to your user page. Thanks again for joining the project! Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 23:29, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Captain Underpants and the Terrifying Re-Turn of Tippy Tinkletrousers. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captain Underpants and the Terrifying Re-Turn of Tippy Tinkletrousers (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:25, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In the article say that britney has sold 83 million WW. The point is that aricle was wrote on November 2007 and it doesn´t count sales after Blackout. That is why i thik is better to say that the sales are before that date. What do you think? Sorry for my english.--Albes29 (talk) 12:05, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've been reading your user page and the comments under the 'WTF?' section about Evolution. You need to lighten up, get a hobby and stop taking Wikipedia so damn seriously. You're taking its rules to the extreme now; its a website, stop being so addicted to it and stating rules and.. ugh. Just have a bit of humour in your life. You want to delete all the humurous pages from Wikipedia? You sad, sad man. Your taking Wikipedia like a law you have to follow; please, find something else to do, because I feel Wikipedia has taken over your life; and not for the better either ;) --Flashflash; 07:08, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LOL :D I like you. You are a subtle ironist indeed. I'm glad my comments from 27 months ago were able to entertain you!~ Best wishes to you and yours, Love, Your Friend and Mine Silence. ~~-Silence (talk) 07:27, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for the picture of the stapler; I never learnt your name? :) --Flashflash; 08:07, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

your calling an admin to look at what Youdisapeartothesky (talk) 13:48, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

what situiation...all the info on the page is not true....the cover is fake , the track listing is fake....im sorry but im not going to let u keep false information...i put correct information with reliable sources.....Youdisapeartothesky (talk) 13:53, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• This is a reminder to remain civil when interacting with others please, as you hadn't here. Also consider my brief notes here as they apply equally to you. Good luck. Nja²⁴⁷ 14:17, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Your comments on the article talk page continually calling the other user a noob are becoming tiresome. Please stop it. The sooner you two stop name calling and start acting like grownups, the sooner the other millions of users you two have locked out of the article will be able to edit it again. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:32, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above user was confirmed to be a sockpuppet of banned User:Brexx and has been blocked indefinitely. Please resume your editing and don't let Brexx get under your skin.

Peace! Big Bird (talk • contribs) 15:03, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We are discussing what to do with the problem here.—Kww(talk) 15:16, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Flashflash, I noticed you are a member of the WikiProject Magazine, which I have joined and will contribute in the future. I have created a new page for an online magazine Bloginity which was up for speedy deletion several times for several reasons. I was hoping to get your voice on this matter and help me get the page published as it contains quality and informative information for anyone who is interested in reading about the background, and foundation. I am looking forward to your reply, and hoping that you would share your voice in this article entry. (71.190.254.239 (talk) 21:13, 20 January 2011 (UTC)). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.190.254.239 (talk)

If so, then you need to place this userbox, {{User WikiProject Record Labels}}, somewhere on your user page. If not, please remove your name from here or I will do it for you in a weeks time (May 14, 2012). Devin (talk) 05:02, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Boredom.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 18:47, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Flowers & A Fountain.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned personal image, no foreseeable use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 11:05, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Pappers.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTWEBHOST

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 11:05, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Damit wir es nicht vergessen.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned personal image, no foreseeable use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 11:05, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Pepper shaker lying on its side.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned personal image, no foreseeable use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 11:05, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Wood Floor.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned personal image, no foreseeable use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 11:05, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Line of Dominos.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned personal image, no foreseeable use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 11:06, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Teenager.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned personal image, no foreseeable use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 11:06, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Centerpiece.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned personal image, no foreseeable use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 11:06, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Flowers in the wind.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned personal image, no foreseeable use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 11:06, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Colosseum.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused orphaned photo of the Colosseum that is way too over saturated. No foreseeable use case for Commons either. Out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 16:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]