An article you recently created, Hepton (astronomy), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. --Bears (talk) 11:39, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article November 2068 lunar eclipse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/November 2068 lunar eclipse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:53, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article May 2068 lunar eclipse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/May 2068 lunar eclipse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:54, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article May 2086 lunar eclipse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/May 2086 lunar eclipse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:55, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article November 2086 lunar eclipse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/November 2086 lunar eclipse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:56, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All the sources for the article are included. Eric Nelson27 (talk) 07:29, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article February 2056 lunar eclipse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/February 2056 lunar eclipse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 00:27, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article June 2057 lunar eclipse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/June 2057 lunar eclipse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:33, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eric Nelson27. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hepton (astronomy), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:04, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm MikeAllen. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Cameron Diaz, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Mike Allen 03:30, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Amanda Miguel, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Eric Nelson27! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Eclipse cycle, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://webspace.science.uu.nl/~gent0113/eclipse/eclipsecycles_cycles.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Eclipse cycle and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Eclipse cycle, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Eclipse cycle. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Eclipse cycle with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Eclipse cycle saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Diannaa (talk) 14:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Well the section that says unidos used material from the source, and was why it was added to the page, and apparently for non-copyrighted reasons.

Your message looks like a mistake.

If my work is really copyrighted material, then the quotes about the unidos quote on the page (which someone else added to the page before I added any changes to the page in 2024) would have been removed unless otherwise proven not to infringe copyright.

The source was added to the name of each cycle added to the page to prevent such problems, as sources address regarding problems.

Plus a few more sources were also added to address the copyright problems.

I believe the work is certainly necessary to add and that copyright infringement wasn't intended.

Though adding material to pages without the sources is a different story.

And I wasn't the first involved. Eric Nelson27 (talk) 22:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the content you removed from my message. Please don't alter other people's posts.

There wasn't any content in our article that matches the source webpage until January 15, 2024. Some of the edits in question were made by yourself, and some were performed by an IP. I am unable to check your latest work on the article at the moment because the tools that I need to do so are not working properly at the moment. So I have restored the copyvio template for the time being until I can check your work properly. — Diannaa (talk) 12:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have now been able to check your work using an automated tool. I found that there's still too much overlap with the source webpage. You can view the overlap using this tool. — Diannaa (talk) 13:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removed as much overlapping as I could while keeping the content relevant to the topic to solve as many copyright issues as possible. Eric Nelson27 (talk) 05:13, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]