Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Patricia Kaas have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Patricia Kaas was changed by Eddo1982! (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.897731 on 2021-03-19T13:46:40+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:46, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

when the imposter is sus [citation needed] Hello, I'm Stroness. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Angus Young, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Stroness (talk) 16:38, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please, don't ignore the official list of twin towns on Pelhřimov's website which is cited and don't add Waddinxveen as its twin town repeatedly. It could be considered as vandalism. Thank you. FromCzech (talk) 18:02, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. FromCzech (talk) 09:05, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Schazjmd. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ellen Foley, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 14:25, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at André Onana. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GiantSnowman 19:55, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Pelhřimov, you may be blocked from editing. FromCzech (talk) 20:19, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at André Onana. GiantSnowman 09:37, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I didn't know his last name is Onana Onana. I thought that was a mistake. Eddo1982! (talk) 09:56, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Pierre van Hooijdonk, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unsourced content. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:03, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What's the problem? Pierre van Hooijdonk has more than 1 name. Look at the Dutch page of him. I think it's going too far to say I'm vandalizing it! Eddo1982! (talk) 16:14, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whether there's a different name on the Dutch Wikipedia is neither here nor there, it needs to be sourced here. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:21, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 2022 FIFA World Cup knockout stage, you may be blocked from editing. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 17:51, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I was correcting the order of the matches. The order was wrong. What's the problem? Eddo1982! (talk) 18:00, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain to me why, for example, on December 4, match 51 that is played later than match 52 (which is not chronologically correct) will be adjusted again? Eddo1982! (talk) 18:23, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The matches are labeled according to the official schedule released by FIFA. The chronology does not matter. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 18:52, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Leen van Steensel. GiantSnowman 17:06, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well GiantSnowman,

Whats the problem? In 2021 the news came that Leen became the new coach for next season(2022-2023). Eddo1982! (talk) 17:17, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you used edit summaries to explain your edits, we would not have this problem. GiantSnowman 16:01, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Maarten Stekelenburg. FMSky (talk) 23:04, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Vinny Guadagnino. FMSky (talk) 09:12, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mattythewhite (talk) 00:28, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]