Welcome Dyaluk08!

Hello, I'm Robvanvee. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, No One Knows, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robvanvee 10:45, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Isaac Hayes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tipton County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing to the article K.Flay. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:05, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Archer1234. I noticed that you recently removed content from St Julie's Catholic High School without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Archer1234 (talk) 14:48, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Fred Gandt. I noticed that you recently made an edit to The 1975 in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 14:54, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't italicise random words such as "filming", as you did here. WP:ITALICS clearly tells us when italics need to be used. Cheers! Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:34, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clarence Clemons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chesapeake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't modify articles massively without any discussion or explanation, as you did on Sasha Grey. This page was nominated as good article in March (and almost made it) and after a WP:GOCE cleanup again in December (pending). There just are no open issues justifying huge modifications, all changes in 2019 are documented and/or discussed on the talk page. –84.46.52.176 (talk) 02:33, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

pls review WP:PARAGRAPH -MOS:PARA - MOS:BEGINNING - MOS:OPENPARABIO.--Moxy 🍁 16:42, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Samantha Morton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Nesbitt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paddy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:10, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spencer Tracy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broadway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:34, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Liam Gallagher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonathon Ross (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cold War (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sanitarium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sarah Goldberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broadway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Please could you refrain from describing your edits as 'grammar' when they're clearly far wider in scope. Only describe grammar edits as such, as it makes it harder for other editors. Many thanks.NEDOCHAN (talk) 11:44, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stone Cold Steve Austin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Cole (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Eddie Shack, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Specifically per MOS:NICKNAMETHE, a leading '"the" in nicknames is generally not capitalized. —Bagumba (talk) 15:57, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Remain in Light, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 06:20, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Townsend Coleman. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:55, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ain't No Grave, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scott Lucas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:43, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Troy Baker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joel Miller.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gangsta Boo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Memphis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The information you restored to Belle Delphine was not supported by the cited sources. If existing sources support this, use them. Otherwise, please do not restore this information Please review WP:DOB also. Thank you.

Hi there, just to let you know I partially reverted one of your edits to Left 4 Dead. I have detailed why on the edit summary.

Let me know if you have any questions.

AussieWikiDan ^(talk) 15:41, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bald and Bankrupt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bald and Bankrupt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Nemov (talk) 15:17, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Newgrounds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BBS.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Hulmem. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Idiocracy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. hulmem (talk) 15:40, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Alduin2000. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jacksepticeye, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Note: please find secondary sources for this addition to ensure that it constitutes a due weight in the article. Thank you. Alduin2000 (talk) 12:08, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dave Allen (comedian), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cowboys and Indians.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Sariel Xilo (talk) 23:49, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rachel McDowall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Producers.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here: [1] your edit summary was not accurate. You removed eight photos and that fact was not mentioned in your edit summary. I mentioned in my edit summary undoing your edit that a 2020 Environmental Wiki event was the effort of the many contributors that had added many of these photos and text. I also suggested that you propose any potential changes on the talk page. Thanks --Ooligan (talk) 08:04, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello editor Dyaluk08. Please can you refrain from putting your own version of Childwall regarding the pronounciation. There is no silent d the area is simply pronounced as it spelt. Regards. Babydoll9799 (talk) 21:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited City of Liverpool F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Imperial Hotel.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello editor Dyaluk08. I like your revisions on the pages for Dave and Gareth. Please be careful, I had a heck of a time getting Gareth's picture up even while working directly with Mandee the photographer. Your edit got it flagged for deletion. Dave's page is subject to getting taken over by fans of Damn Interesting if you make edits they don't approve of ... it can get messy, so just a heads up. AnnieBee3 (talk) 15:47, 15 October 2021 (UTC)AnnieBee3[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Humanistic Judaism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Naturalism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at A Nightmare on Elm Street, you may be blocked from editing. I see that you're claiming to be a new editor, though you also have over six thousand edits, which is a bit confusing. In any case, you've received multiple warnings for unsourced or poorly sourced information in the past, and yet with your edit to this article you added information you cited to Reddit. Please review WP:RS. DonIago (talk) 20:40, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Regal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Northern English.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bo (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beauregard.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the 10 Cloverfield Lane plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Additionally, I'm unclear as to why you removed sources in your edit. DonIago (talk) 20:57, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, editor Dyaluk08, Viacom is now a disambiguation page. So when you link to the company, the way you did at Kevin Hart, please use:

[[Paramount Global|Viacom]] or just [[Paramount Global]]

See more about linking at the help page and the project page. Thank you for your edits and for your support in this! P.I. Ellsworth - ed. ^put'r there 09:55, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thanks for your changes in Basshunter article. I have found few issues:

1. Chief executive officer = CEO. Why don't introduce the full name first or ever? Eurohunter (talk) 18:14, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2. In case of Tottenham Hotspur F.C. is "F.C." incorrect? I think "Tottenham Hotspur" is common name and probably article should be moved to Tottenham Hotspur. Eurohunter (talk) 18:14, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

3. "Altberg began producing music under the stage name "Basshunter" at the age of 17." - it mean he use this name since he was 17 (2001 or 2002). He was born on 22 December so if he mean 17 years old he could mean 2002 not just the nine days after his birthday on 22 December. Eurohunter (talk) 18:14, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

4. Digital audio workstation software is actually used as instrument than "programming" (?). Eurohunter (talk) 18:14, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

5. I think there could be image of Sturegymnasiet. Eurohunter (talk) 18:20, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

6. Why parameters works and awards were deleted from infobox? Eurohunter (talk) 17:35, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could I have answers? Eurohunter (talk) 17:35, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:13, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Josh Homme, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Supergroup.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

==Ethnicelebs.com as a reference Hi Dyaluk08 . I noticed that you used ethnicelebs.com as a reference for biographical information in Josh Homme. Please note that the general consensus as expressed at WP:RSN is that it does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. I've gone ahead and removed it. If you disagree, let's discuss it. You may want to check WP:RSP and WP:RSN to help determine if a source is reliable. Thanks.--Hipal (talk) 19:05, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Danbloch. I noticed that you recently made an edit to The Wombats in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.

This is just one of many such changes. A grammar change would be changing a verb tense, or fixing subject-object agreement. What you're doing is copyediting. Regards, Dan Bloch (talk) 23:22, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Last of Us (TV series). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CastJared (talk) 02:28, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Extremely online has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. This edit of yours claimed to have "Fixed placement of various punctuation, mostly brackets and commas, as well as fixing capitalization throughout article" but was a direct restoration of a significant rewrite that you'd made in December, and which was reverted at the time. Belbury (talk) 10:26, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. This summary left out major changes like the creation of a new section and the rearrangement of various claims. You also wrote that you "added refs" when you added one ref (i.e., Inquisitr), which was unreliable per WP:RSP. Please summarize more accurately. KyleJoan^talk 08:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dude. No template. Just a warning. Don't lie with your edit summaries, like you did on Graham Linehan. What are you, 12? Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 22:57, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CastJared. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Last of Us (TV series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CastJared (talk) 08:59, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 10:43, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For your lack of communication, you have been blocked from editing articles. Perhaps you have not been aware of this page, and all the warnings on it? Please respond constructively below, and you may be unblocked. Bishonen | tålk 02:26, 2 March 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]