Cannabis Ruderalis

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barry Silbert (November 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 13:57, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Jamiebuba,
Could you explain how to do this? The person I referred to was Barry Silbert. He is a billionaire (forbes proof given) worth 3.2 billion dollars and he is the founder of Digital currency group which owns Greyscale Bitcoin trust which is worth over 40 billions dollars and prolific investor in the cryptocurrency space. The only reason why I created the page was because there was no page for him when I was reading about Digital Currency Group. The company is worth now 20 billion plus as per last valuation and has an employee strength of 1000+ people and they are based in NYC and Stamford, Connecticut.
I do not know each and everything about him. I just put the entry as a contribution to wiki for being helped by wiki all these years. I am in the cryptocurrency space and I see that many of the famous people including founders sprecially the silent ones do not have an entry in wikipedia
Dropsecure Dropsecure (talk) 14:21, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Dropsecure: A reliable source is a source with an established reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight. The page Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources is a good place to look at how frequently-discussed sources have been evaluated for their reliability. For example, Crunchbase is not considered to be a reliable source. Sources also have to be independent, having no personal, political or financial interest in the subject.
Even if a source is considered reliable, the material you cite must be significant coverage. Brief mentions or list entries are not sufficient. Also, interviews with the subject are considered primary sources and therefore lack the required independence.
I also noticed that your account name is also the same as a business (https://dropsecure.com/). This is prohibited by Wikipedia's username policy - account names must represent individuals - not businesses, organizations or groups of people. Please change your username or you risk your account being blocked. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:43, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello drm310,
I will change my username to my name. My company is dropsecure. I am into zeroknowledge proofs, blockchains , distributed computing and security and privacy. Is a name like drm310 enough?
Also is not forbes reliable independent enough? What is required? DCG the company is on wiki. It is valued at 20 billion plus
This is the 2021 article
https://blockworks.co/digital-currency-group-raises-700m-now-valued-at-10b/
Need to figure out how to change my username to AmGan1976
AmGan1976 Dropsecure (talk) 15:05, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have inlcuded New York times and Wall Street Journal articles of DcG and Barry Silbert. Let me know if they are independent enough Dropsecure (talk) 15:16, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have added WSj and NYT articles for barry and DCG Dropsecure (talk) 15:18, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also for your reference I am neither paid by anyone I write about nor working as an employee of any crypto company Dropsecure (talk) 15:20, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Link for username change: Wikipedia:Changing username/Simple --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:33, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Dropsecure: I see you posted at the WP:Teahouse after my messages to you here. Changing your username should be your first priority, because continuing to edit under a username that violates policy will earn you a block. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:32, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Dropsecure! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 13:57, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of discretionary sanctions regarding blockchain and cryptocurrency topics[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:47, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am specifically writing about the tech, companies and people in this space that are not scams and with reference to mainstream articles and journals Dropsecure (talk) 15:17, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barry Silbert (November 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 19:55, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Barry Silbert[edit]

Information icon Hello, AmGan1976. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Barry Silbert, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Barry Silbert[edit]

Hello, AmGan1976. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Barry Silbert".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:05, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply