THC Science

Sgkukolich, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Sgkukolich! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Blaze The Wolf (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Minor edits are minor[edit]

See WP:MINOR for what qualifies about minor. David notMD (talk) 01:28, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Autobiography[edit]

Wikipedia dislikes attempts at autobiography (see WP:AUTO) but does not prohibit. A success at creating a biography requires multiple refs to content that is about you. Referencing your own journal articles contributes nothing toward establishing your nobility. David notMD (talk) 01:39, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David,

Thanks for your efforts. I have received multiple offers from "editors" who say they can fix my page so it is published. What are the chances of success by one of these persons? Best, Steve DrGeorge22 (talk) 17:57, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi DrGeorge22! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, paid editors?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephen Kukolich (July 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:PROF) but presently does not. As other reviewers have noted, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable . Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see referencing for beginners. Additionally, the draft reads too much like a CV, which Wikipedia is not. Please note that references to journal articles authored by the subject are not suitable for establishing notability. Please familiarise yourself with theses pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements then resubmit the page and ping me and I would be happy to reassess.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stephen Kukolich and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Stephen Kukolich, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cabrils (talk) 23:32, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Stephen Kukolich[edit]

Hello, DrGeorge22. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stephen Kukolich, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephen Kukolich has been accepted[edit]

Stephen Kukolich, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:11, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for reviewing and favorable review. I will continue trying to improve the page. Your efforts are sincerely appreciated.

Best regards, Steve Kukolich DrGeorge22 (talk) 21:24, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]