Hello, Dessymona! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 09:07, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

—

		The Music Barnstar
		For ongoing contributions to Lollipop (Taiwanese group) Chewyrunt (talk) 15:53, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you wrote this in your edit summary. There is no dispute as far as the WP:CPOP front goes, and as far as WP:EL goes. Fan sites are only kept if they provide information that cannot already be found on verifiable third-party news sources. Most, if not all, C-pop fan sites will derive their news from newspapers or online news sources. Lollipop was formed after 2002, so news sources can be easily found online. On several online news sources, there are also a number of articles on Mayday's beginnings on various news sites. What this means that practially all news found on fan forums is rehashed. Without news, what do you get in fan forums? Image galleries, fan-made images, and useless banter. For this very reason, fan forums do not fit under the WP:EL guideline. So in the future, please don't confuse people that there is some kind of dispute about external links. Because there isn't. Pandacomics (talk) 12:33, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh trust me, there's no such thing as "the possibility of people adding fansites." People end up fansites...ALL THE TIME. Sigh. It's probably never going to stop, and it's horrendously annoying. And I guess I misinterpreted your edit summary. Keep up the stuff with the Mayday/Lollipop articles.Pandacomics (talk) 13:06, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thank u for the feedback Dessymona. I'm just a person that thinks some of the info i have is unique. if i was doing it for advertisement, there would be 100 links a day and probably a lot of wrong ones but i have taken things that seemed beneficial , newsworthy or exclusive information that is only listed in one place (much like box office mojo..a site i love!! :)) I thank you for your feedback as I'm new to this and welcome any more that you might have as I said to CKatz..if you ever feel like doing a little 101 lesson, i'm all for it!!! :) in the meantime, ill read through the "how to" again. Thank you!! --Amyreelz (talk) 13:52, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking that you might consider applying for rollback rights. I've seen you all over the Twilight page, rv'ing vandalism. Because I'm not an administrator, I can't grant them to you, but I'm encouraging you to apply for it. It'll make reverting vandalism a lot easier. If y'want to apply, just go here. Keep up the good work, Dessymona! IceUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 17:49, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• • Thanks, Icy, for your tip. I've been thinking about applying for the rollback rights, and your comment prompted me to do that. Dessymona (talk) 15:22, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! If you think you deserve something, don't hesitate. I see from the below message your request was granted :). Not a surprise. IceUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 22:49, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for rollback has been granted. Remember that if you are not 100% sure an edit is vandalism, don't use it. Happy editing! WilliamH (talk) 14:10, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dessymona. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dessymona. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]