See User talk:Cutler/Archive1.

Cutler, you appear to be responsible for the extension of the article on Felix Ehrenhaft. There's a quote by Einstein, which I find interesting. Unfortunately, it's not references. Can you add it? Many thanks in advance! --Suspekt (talk) 21:31, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your "weird" article works for me and there are a lot of legal pages that are useful and this would be a nice example for DYK. The link to Matisse gives a nice hook (and illustration!). Tell you what is odd, I wrote Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations yesterday. It needs a co-author to take it to 2,000 words ... any interest? Victuallers (talk) 15:20, 6 March 2008 (UTC) ...o yours is now nominated. Not sure the picture can remain in your article under fair use ... it could be argued that the "true owner" is very likely to object to any showing of this image. Victuallers (talk) 23:06, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• ...that the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations required all of the 241 UK work related deaths in 2006/7 to be reported - even if the victims take a year to die? by Cutler and Victuallers OK? I think you have ended up doing a lot more than I expected... but there should be 2 odd articles now :-) Victuallers (talk) 11:51, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For your great work on RIDDOR. There is a class at Wilsthorpe Business and Enterprise College who used our/your page this morning! Victuallers (talk) 12:12, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, I have folded the two UK legislation infoboxes together. I have taken the code from your version and made three tweaks. The IF statements that you had used for three of the rows at the bottom of the table have been altered so that if there is not text for those parameters the rows do not appear in the table at all. It is simply a cosmetic change to make the table appear more neat when nothing has been entered into those three rows. I have altered all of the links to the version that you created to the other version of the template, simply because its capitalisation is more consistent and more articles use it. I will add the table of links to legislation to the bottom of those articles which do not have it. David Newton (talk) 22:23, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An open question/suggestion for you and David Newton: Shouldn't Template:UK legislation and Template:British legislation lists, Acts be merged? – Swid ^{(talk · edits)} 05:31, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 10 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

- no idea why this wasn't awarded by "central" DYK people ... but I saw it and "doesn't do" to moan at volunteers - we do our best. Victuallers (talk) 16:14, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 11 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Gatoclass (talk) 09:09, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You requested the report of the CEAS in the case of Lucia de Berk. My memory says that there was an original translation of this. But I will give you what I can find. http://www.luciadeb.nl/english.html http://jokerxl.com/Lucia/Lucia.html http://www.om.nl/dossier/themadossiers/commissie_evaluatie_afgesloten_strafzaken__posthum/_nieuwsberichten/32473/

I will keep on searching for the English version of the report, till I'm proven wrong ... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.156.190.62 (talk) 15:11, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading Image:AJTC logo.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:04, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At the time I used the <sup> tag rather than the <small> tag I did not have any particular reason for doing so. However, after having looked at the results of the two I think that the superscript tag is the superior one to use. The whole point of shrinking the text is to save space. Both of the tags create text that is the same size. However the superscript text has less white space between the lines and thus takes it considerably less vertical screen real estate. David Newton (talk) 17:00, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This section has been courtesy blanked per a request by the subject of the article being discussed. If you have any questions, please do not hesitiate to contact me, preferably by email. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 04:02, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to have created a duplicate of {{Infobox UK Legislation}} at {{Infobox UK legislation}}. Is there any particular reason for this? Road Wizard (talk) 13:52, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see from an earlier topic above that David Newton merged the code from the l box into the L box. I assume therefore that the l template can be made into a redirect. Let me know if you have any problem with this. Road Wizard (talk) 13:57, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied to your comment. —SlamDiego_←T 00:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For Cutler, to say that the work you've done is top rate: the product liability laws, health and safety regulations, various statutes and cases (esp. R v. Dudley and Stephens, numerous biographies; well done and cheers! It's all worth it! Wikidea 13:20, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't agree more with you. And I hope that you keep it up (subject to the odd wikibreak of course). :) Wikidea 16:47, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Sir Sidney Rowlatt.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Cutler, Thankyou for pointing that out. There were some serious confusions in what I had put in, and I can't explain how I did that unless I was very tired and my mind was playing tricks with me. I apologise for a false trail. What I have left (in the two articles) is, I believe, accurate. Thanks again, Eebahgum (talk) 23:50, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cutler, on the template you made, do you know why the extra white space appears at the top of the pages where it's used, and is it possible to fix it? Wikidea 17:15, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just tried to send you an email, but your 'Email this user' function isn't on. Why not send me a message, and I'll write back that way? :) Wikidea 00:09, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ian MacGregor.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 15:56, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. I've added the two agencies you mention; if there are any more, by all means add them too. Sardanaphalus (talk) 02:47, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering if you'd like to add a comment to the Law page's featured article review? :) Wikidea 13:43, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Per our discussion on the CCP: Was it Wedderburn or Cockburn you wrote about? I'm assuming Cockburn since wedderburn is fairly inline-free.Ironholds (talk) 23:01, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming Cockburn; I've rejiggled a few things (odd dating system for the DOB/DOD, spaces after the dash code, so on) and added in the additional info from the ODNB. Feel free to remove it (obviously) if you don't feel it works. Ironholds (talk) 23:07, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'm probably going to expand the CJ list more to see if I can get it to Featured status, who knows. I'm cutting back at the moment on similar grounds (too much important work, too little time). As someone who's never experienced it I have to ask; what's pupillage like? Ironholds (talk) 11:37, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair does, heh. Ironholds (talk) 11:42, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice! I've been a bit distracted by uni work and as a result haven't been editing so much myself. I jumped back in today with some work on chemical engineering (which I know absolutely nothing about). Out of interest can you recommend any articles to do with london on WP that need a decent free use image? I'm back in town for the meet and thought I'd take my camera out. Ironholds (talk) 16:10, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Christian Evidence Society, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unsourced stub on obscure 19th century creationist group. Has been in existence for over 3 years without any substantive content being added.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk 11:19, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cutler, and happy new year. I just wanted to say, I've moved my article style to OSCOLA, because it appears that the House of Lords has too, and most (good?) journals are doing this now. I was just wondering if you'd do the same, so we're consistent on the English law cases? It basically means doing "v" instead of "v.", which saves quite a lot of keystrokes over a lifetime! Wikidea 00:29, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:William Fairbairn.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:49, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Crownest has expressed interest in reviving this. Since you were a member of the FD project (now converted into a taskforce), I'm wondering if you'd be a part of the Taskforce. The taskforce is undergoing a significant overhaul at the moment, and by the end of it, it should be fairly easy to get around and there should be a nifty compendium of useful tools for people interested in FD. Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 10:54, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Rajiv Lather , has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajiv Lather (2nd nomination) . Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jay (talk) 03:32, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Classic_fatigued_axle.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:02, 4 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:02, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Harold Otto Danckwerts, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Redirect that points to a disambiguation page with no link to anyone by this name.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Matt (talk) 09:00, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! A WikiProject Worcestershire has now been created to better manage all articles that relate in any way to the county even if they overlap with other categories or projects. Please visit the project pages and if you see listed any articles you have written or contributed to, or if you would like to see more active development of them, don't hesitate to join the project.

I have nominated Harold Otto Danckwerts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Matt (talk) 03:42, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dark smoke has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No encyclopedic context - might be a candidate for transwikification to Wiktionary as a definition.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:18, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cutler! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 945 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Pierre Gy - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Claire Gordon - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Ben Black (rugby league) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:28, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Darwin family tree v3.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:24, 8 April 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 08:24, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Ben Greene, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. PunkyMcPunkersen (talk) 18:49, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi mate. I know it's been a while (2005) but I saw your question at Talk:Barberini and have tried to give some form of answer. Cheers, Stalwart111 (talk) 03:13, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article David William Dye has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable person

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:06, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Stress 2.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:19, 18 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:19, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Stress 3.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:20, 18 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:20, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Alfred Robens.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:44, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Cutler,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chlopeck (talk • contribs) 14:05, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The article 'Offices, Shops and Railway Premises Act 1963' has a dead link that could not be repaired automatically. Can you help fix it?

Dead: http://www.royalsoced.org.uk/events/reports/rae_1996.pdf

• You added this in August 2008.
• The bot tested this link on 28 March, 30 March, 1 April, 8 April, 13 April and today, but it never worked.
• The bot checked The Wayback Machine and WebCite but couldn't find a suitable replacement.

This link is marked with {{Dead link}} in the article. Please take a look at that article and fix what you can. Thank you!

PS- you can opt-out of these notifications by adding {{Bots |deny=BlevintronBot}} to your user page or user talk page. BlevintronBot (talk) 04:29, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sir James Cockburn, 8th Baronet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir James Cockburn, 8th Baronet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Crusoe8181 (talk) 09:19, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox UK legislation mini has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:26, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox UK public body has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:48, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dates for Winston Churchill in the family tree are incorrect. Should be: 30 November 1874 – 24 January 1965. After correcting please add the following image again to the article on the Guest family. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 13:51, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cutler! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 11:45, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox UK Statutory Instrument has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox UK legislation. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Alakzi (talk) 02:48, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph Jagger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Jagger until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 01:30, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Might it not be helpful to indicate association with attempts to publish Parliamentary reports, along with Debrett and his brother-in-law?

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cutler, I've now removed your sysop userright, per previous talk page notifications, under WP:Inactive administrators. Thank you very much for your service. Worm^TT(talk) 12:19, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Autrefois. Since you had some involvement with the Autrefois redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  — PinkAmpers&^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 00:04, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ben Black (composer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:17, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Ben Black (composer), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Atlantic306 (talk) 19:19, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ben Black (composer), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cutler. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ben Black".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:30, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Roadmender has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBOOK I can find zero coverage or reliable reviews of this book.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sulfurboy (talk) 23:13, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Viscosity (imaging software) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:10, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sir James Lithgow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have proposed a merger of the Western Electric (tube manufacturer) article into the main Western Electric article. I have posted a thread on Talk:Western Electric (tube manufacturer) to discuss the proposed merger. I invite everyone's thoughts on the idea. Garagepunk66 (talk) 20:33, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]