18 July 2009

• curprev 05:3005:30, 18 July 2009‎ Abd talk contribs‎ 15,492 bytes −201,806‎ I'll accept setting this aside, though I think a simple conclusion could be made, it doesn't have to be a recommendation of specific text. undo

17 July 2009

• curprev 17:1017:10, 17 July 2009‎ Enric Naval talk contribs‎ 217,298 bytes +345‎ →‎Fourth try: ooops, didn't notice that Cryptic had posted some minutes ago undo
• curprev 16:5516:55, 17 July 2009‎ Enric Naval talk contribs‎ 216,953 bytes +1,247‎ →‎Fourth try: fails to address the high-quality secondary sources, problems with sources, will just move it there, suggestion to move the discussion undo
• curprev 16:4616:46, 17 July 2009‎ Cryptic C62 talk contribs‎ 215,706 bytes +998‎ →‎Fourth try: outdenting, response undo
• curprev 15:0815:08, 17 July 2009‎ Abd talk contribs‎ 214,708 bytes +102‎ →‎Fourth try: fmt, clarify. undo
• curprev 15:0415:04, 17 July 2009‎ Abd talk contribs‎ 214,606 bytes +2,596‎ →‎Fourth try: original issue was very simple. Please resolve the original issue, Cryptic. undo

12 July 2009

• curprev 18:4318:43, 12 July 2009‎ Enric Naval talk contribs‎ 212,010 bytes +1,471‎ →‎Fourth try: assumptions made by the public, can't see the problem with those patents and the sources.... undo
• curprev 16:4016:40, 12 July 2009‎ Abd talk contribs‎ 210,539 bytes +1,562‎ →‎Fourth try: considerations undo
• curprev 14:0614:06, 12 July 2009‎ Enric Naval talk contribs‎ 208,977 bytes +841‎ →‎Fourth try: why you should expect that the section grows.... undo

10 July 2009

• curprev 16:4116:41, 10 July 2009‎ Objectivist talk contribs‎ 208,136 bytes +496‎ →‎Fourth try undo
• curprev 15:0315:03, 10 July 2009‎ Enric Naval talk contribs‎ 207,640 bytes +961‎ →‎Fourth try: current manual lists cold fusion in the inoperative inventions section undo
• curprev 03:2103:21, 10 July 2009‎ Enric Naval talk contribs‎ 206,679 bytes +718‎ →‎Fourth try: wasn't this only about citing the patents themselves, this belongs more to Talk:Cold fusion undo
• curprev 02:5002:50, 10 July 2009‎ Enric Naval talk contribs‎ 205,961 bytes +1,424‎ →‎Third try: another text undo

9 July 2009

• curprev 05:0205:02, 9 July 2009‎ Enric Naval talk contribs‎ 204,537 bytes +155‎ →‎Third try: will write up something later undo

6 July 2009

• curprev 23:5423:54, 6 July 2009‎ Coppertwig talk contribs‎ 204,382 bytes +36‎ →‎Fourth try: Signing Abd's post undo
• curprev 05:0505:05, 6 July 2009‎ Abd talk contribs‎ 204,346 bytes +667‎ →‎Fourth try: It's implied in the 2007 source for Miles' statement. undo
• curprev 03:0903:09, 6 July 2009‎ Cryptic C62 talk contribs‎ 203,679 bytes +246‎ →‎Third try: splitting off, re undo
• curprev 01:1801:18, 6 July 2009‎ Abd talk contribs‎ 203,433 bytes +1,035‎ →‎Third try: new attempt. undo

5 July 2009

• curprev 16:0916:09, 5 July 2009‎ Coppertwig talk contribs‎ 202,398 bytes +207‎ →‎Third try: I support Cryptic's suggestion undo
• curprev 16:0016:00, 5 July 2009‎ Cryptic C62 talk contribs‎ 202,191 bytes +617‎ →‎Third try: my second try undo
• curprev 15:5815:58, 5 July 2009‎ Cryptic C62 talk contribs‎ 201,574 bytes +100‎ +hatnote undo
• curprev 15:0115:01, 5 July 2009‎ Enric Naval talk contribs‎ 201,474 bytes +340‎ →‎Third try: you are right, wil separate the articles and attribute undo
• curprev 13:1113:11, 5 July 2009‎ Coppertwig talk contribs‎ 201,134 bytes +1,479‎ →‎Third try: Fourth try. undo
• curprev 03:5603:56, 5 July 2009‎ Abd talk contribs‎ 199,655 bytes +17‎ →‎Third try: better source for accelerated patent application due to age. undo
• curprev 03:4803:48, 5 July 2009‎ Abd talk contribs‎ 199,638 bytes +1,427‎ →‎Third try: mashing up different things here. undo
• curprev 02:1702:17, 5 July 2009‎ Enric Naval talk contribs‎ 198,211 bytes +771‎ →‎Third try: errr undo
• curprev 01:3801:38, 5 July 2009‎ Olorinish talk contribs‎ 197,440 bytes +495‎ →‎Third try: modification undo
• curprev 00:2500:25, 5 July 2009‎ Enric Naval talk contribs‎ 196,945 bytes +44‎ →‎Third try: +bold text so people find the proposed text, tweak my comment undo
• curprev 00:2300:23, 5 July 2009‎ Enric Naval talk contribs‎ 196,901 bytes +453‎ →‎Third try: patent numbers,. people haven't commented yet undo

4 July 2009

• curprev 23:5623:56, 4 July 2009‎ Abd talk contribs‎ 196,448 bytes +1,348‎ →‎Third try: I don't think there is such a patent. undo
• curprev 21:3321:33, 4 July 2009‎ Olorinish talk contribs‎ 195,100 bytes +299‎ →‎Third try: question undo
• curprev 18:1318:13, 4 July 2009‎ Cryptic C62 talk contribs‎ m 194,801 bytes +2‎ →‎Third try: italicize undo
• curprev 18:1218:12, 4 July 2009‎ Cryptic C62 talk contribs‎ 194,799 bytes +412‎ →‎Third try: re undo
• curprev 17:5017:50, 4 July 2009‎ Coppertwig talk contribs‎ 194,387 bytes +320‎ →‎Third try: Good work! What's the proposed text currently being discussed? undo
• curprev 17:3517:35, 4 July 2009‎ Enric Naval talk contribs‎ 194,067 bytes +980‎ →‎Third try: about requiring nuclear fusion undo
• curprev 15:2715:27, 4 July 2009‎ Enric Naval talk contribs‎ 193,087 bytes +240‎ →‎Third try: good compromise undo
• curprev 13:5813:58, 4 July 2009‎ Cryptic C62 talk contribs‎ 192,847 bytes +926‎ →‎Third try: my suggestion undo
• curprev 13:4713:47, 4 July 2009‎ Enric Naval talk contribs‎ 191,921 bytes +148‎ →‎Third try: other people undo
• curprev 13:2613:26, 4 July 2009‎ Abd talk contribs‎ m 191,773 bytes −1‎ →‎Third try: fix itals undo
• curprev 13:2513:25, 4 July 2009‎ Abd talk contribs‎ 191,774 bytes +2,630‎ →‎Third try: and this shows exactly why synthesis is deprecated. undo
• curprev 12:0712:07, 4 July 2009‎ Enric Naval talk contribs‎ 189,144 bytes +528‎ →‎Third try: not SYNTH undo
• curprev 02:2402:24, 4 July 2009‎ Abd talk contribs‎ 188,616 bytes +34‎ →‎Third try: clarify. this is about rejecting experimental results because of major theoretical objections. undo
• curprev 01:5901:59, 4 July 2009‎ Abd talk contribs‎ 188,582 bytes +1,460‎ →‎Third try: those topics were introduced by Enric's proposed text. undo

3 July 2009

• curprev 22:1922:19, 3 July 2009‎ Enric Naval talk contribs‎ 187,122 bytes +341‎ →‎Third try: these two topics should be in separate discussions undo

2 July 2009

• curprev 18:0318:03, 2 July 2009‎ Enric Naval talk contribs‎ m 186,781 bytes 0‎ →‎Second try: put the newest comment below the older one, where they are usually placed when using this level of indentation undo
• curprev 16:0616:06, 2 July 2009‎ Abd talk contribs‎ 186,781 bytes +3,127‎ →‎Third try: the substance is correct, but synthesized away from the source, it can be done better. undo
• curprev 15:4715:47, 2 July 2009‎ Abd talk contribs‎ 183,654 bytes +1,729‎ →‎Third try: slipping by *might* be cogent for 2004, but not for 2008; more likely it's that the patent wasn't for cold fusion itself, but for a material that also has other possible uses. undo
• curprev 15:3315:33, 2 July 2009‎ Abd talk contribs‎ 181,925 bytes +1,555‎ →‎Second try: Telekinesis, perhaps? undo
• curprev 15:2715:27, 2 July 2009‎ Enric Naval talk contribs‎ 180,370 bytes +77‎ →‎Third try: collapse long quote undo
• curprev 15:2515:25, 2 July 2009‎ Enric Naval talk contribs‎ 180,293 bytes +4,880‎ →‎Second try: third try, quoth science article undo