Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Chuka Chief. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Nick Moyes (talk) 17:34, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for reporting the offensive comments left on your talk page. I have blocked the IP user and WP:REVDELed their rather pathetic comments. You did the right thing by reporting a user to WP:AIV, but in future you might also like to know that you can use an automated tool called WP:TWINKLE to revert vandalism and leave an escalating series of warnings for them at the same time. There is a very easy way to do this by activating 'Twinkle' in your personal Preferences. Just go to the Gadget tab and the tick the 13th entry down for TWINKLE. From then on will see a 'TW' drop-down menu item next to the main search box in the top right of the page. At the users' page, click the TW then the 'Warn' button and select the most appropriate notice to leave them. These should escalate from Level 1 to Level 4, and thereafter you should go to AIV, just as you did today. Although you didn't go through the escalting series of requests to stop, it was clear they were WP:NOTHERE, so a block was quite justified. Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 17:45, 9 February 2020 (UTC)  [reply]

Nick Moyes, thank you for the welcome and the advice on how to handle vandals. I was giving "recent changes" a spin today. I will try TWINKLE. Thanks! Chuka Chief (talk) 17:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your anti-vandalism work!

S0091 (talk) 19:46, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! That is one cute kitten!Chuka Chief (talk) 19:47, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What about that "edit summary" thing right ON TOP of "publish changes".

69XXXXXXX.. I don't remember this long number. I'm the one who you pointed this co-called problem out to me "five seconds" ago.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.121.181.163 (talk) 21:15, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I should have used an edit summary, I thought at first you were blanking the article, I did not understand you were doing a move via copy paste to the redirect. However, why are you trying to change the long standing name? Maybe do a Wikipedia:Requested moves? --Chuka Chief (talk) 21:18, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And that is why I don't any money to Wikipedia. You (all) assume I knew (or care) how to do this. 69.121.181.163 (talk) 21:20, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you read Wikipedia:Requested moves and follow that.--Chuka Chief (talk) 21:22, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I wanted to apologise if my editing of this article seemed unnecessarily extensive, I've now been trying to reference articles that justify the validity behind the changes for at least some of the listed individuals. It seems that there's an overwhelming amount of individuals on the list for Muslim converts, who are not remotely notable at all as Muslim converts whatsoever but are only known for their radical/criminal activity. Some of them are known only for such things, with little to absolutely no affiliation to the belief-system that this page currently revolves around, whereas others represent an affiliation that is only under the umbrella of very radicalised/distorted ideologies that would also be cruel representations of the belief-system in question. If individuals shall be kept on here purely on the basis of their fulfilling the criteria for being validly identified as 'Muslim converts' it's rather odd that amongst the millions of ordinary converts around the world, each as nameless and unknown as the next, each amongst the plethora of human activities and endeavours, it is only those under the realm of criminal activity, who seem to have been cherry-picked and included in this list; it seems that convicts/criminals make up 31 of the 141 people in this list. I wanted to therefore request if those who are not notable for any endeavour other than criminal activity (a great many of the convicts named in this list), may be removed, and potentially also those whose activity attributed to Islam is quite ridiculously criminalised/radicalised and quite bluntly condemned by their local (as well as the international) Muslim communities who would have to face being associated alongside these people (such as Charles Brooks, Michael Finton, etc) not otherwise worth mentioning (unless as equally notable as the thousands of regular professors and/or doctors who have been equally, if not much more, notable in the public sphere).

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.194.236.68 (talk) 15:58, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey 196.194.236.68! I understand your motivation, however you should try to take this up on the talk page and change the list criteria. At present criteria for inclusion is any convert to Islam who has a Wikipedia page (so is "notable" per Wikipedia).--Chuka Chief (talk) 18:20, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siyabonga Nhlangwini (talk • contribs) 19:30, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yo! How may I help you? --Chuka Chief (talk) 19:39, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teach me how to publish posts Siyabonga Nhlangwini (talk) 12:19, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is a tutorial you can do. I'll post links on your page.--Chuka Chief (talk) 18:13, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chuka Chief! I'm Ed6767. I noticed you have been using Twinkle and was wondering if you'd like to beta my new tool called RedWarn, specifically designed to improve your editing experience.

RedWarn is currently in use by over 90 other Wikipedians, and feedback so far has been extremely positive. In fact, in a recent survey of RedWarn users, 90% of users said they would recommend RedWarn to another editor. If you're interested, please see the RedWarn tool page for more information on RedWarn's features and instructions on how to install it. Otherwise, feel free to remove this message from your talk page. If you have any further questions, please ping me or leave a message on my talk page. Your feedback is much appreciated! Ed6767 talk! 18:49, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've been seeing Redwarn pop up in edit summaries, so you must be doing something right! I will put it on my reading list and maybe try it out.--Chuka Chief (talk) 18:51, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chuka Chief, I guess I am! Keep in touch on how it works for you :) Ed6767 talk! 19:02, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, changing the page to being only inclusive about a single gender is the exact opposite of neutrality. Please refrain from further editing the page.

You need to follow sources, which speak about women, misogyny, and toxic femininity. --Chuka Chief (talk) 19:57, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 23:27, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I had it on my watchlist, but I joined formally after the invite. Glad to be aboard.--Chuka Chief (talk) 19:15, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello why didi you changed the publication? please explain "overstating things" That is real history please justify , what is "overstating" whit sources. Thank you--Hugo Refachinho (talk) 17:06, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are overstating Portuguese influence and control.--Chuka Chief (talk) 20:01, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Chuka Chief, The article about the 200 year presence of the Portuguese and has several books and works written that are legal sources . Please justify about the reverse. Thanks Hugo Refachinho (talk) 21:43, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

on 1st Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Brigade.

BlueD954 (talk) 00:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove a correct definition? Ayresnick93 (talk) 18:16, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ayresnick93:, this is a disambig page. You also did not provide a reliable source for your text.--Chuka Chief (talk) 18:20, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you for your reverts on my talk page. Good job! We need more users like you! RacoonyRE Message meContributions 19:33, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you.Yungli0n (talk) 15:48, 2 May 2021 (UTC)yungli0n[reply]

Thanks Yungli0n, I regularly leave them, I usually do not leave them when I assume good faith on it being a content issue I disagree with.--Chuka Chief_talk 15:50, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sources for my edits that you removed , How may I attach them to Wikipedia. 41.138.72.9 (talk) 18:58, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late reply, if still relevant read Wikipedia:Citing sources.--Chuka Chief_talk 14:40, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]