Are we not aligning the rating in the center anymore?ChessEric (talk · contribs) 20:56, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CapeVerdeWave! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at QAnon that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Missvain (talk) 18:07, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've finished up the Tornado outbreak of June 23–24, 1952, Tornadoes of 1949, and Tornado outbreak of February 13, 1952 articles and am currently working on the Tornado outbreak of May 21–24, 1952. Can I please get Grazulis data for it? I would really appreciate it. ChessEric (talk · contribs) 18:22, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1947 Fort Lauderdale hurricane related has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. 69.118.232.58 (talk) 14:30, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted by bot.--47.23.6.178 (talk) 20:20, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of United States tornadoes from April to June 1954 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States tornadoes from April to June 1954 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 09:39, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now at Draft:Tornado outbreak of April 2-3, 1956 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:11, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear project member, This message is being sent out to encourage new ideas and feedback on those proposed in regard to the colors debate for WikiProject Weather. For those who are unaware of what's been happening over the last year, I will give a brief summary. We have been discussing proposed changes to the colors of the dots on tropical cyclone maps and templates and infoboxes across the entire weather project in order to solve issues related to the limited contrast between colors for both normal vision as well as the various types of color blindness (MOS:ACCESS). We had partially implemented a proposal earlier this year, however, it was objected to by a number of people and additional issues were presented that made it evident this wasn't the optimal solution. We tried to come up with other solutions to address the issues related to color contrast, however, none of them gained traction and no consensus was generated.

We need your help and I encourage you to propose your own scale and give feedback on those already listed. Keep in mind that we are NOT making a decision on any individual proposal at this time. We are simply allowing people to make proposals and cultivate them given feedback from other project members. Please visit our project page for additional details. The proposal phase will close no later than December 31st at 23:59 UTC. Noah^Talk 03:22, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to User talk:United States Man could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Words like “suing” make other editors uncomfortable and are not allowed. You had a fair opportunity to voice these objections in the RFC so WP:CANVASSING for editors to overturn it is grossly inappropriate. Jasper Deng (talk) 20:38, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wish to clarify that under no circumstances have I considered legal action against Wikipedia, nor am I interested in "canvassing". I am going to remove my complaint to begin with. CapeVerdeWave (talk) 17:30, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jasper Deng: The original section is here. Please feel free to remove it. I have enjoyed contributing here and do not wish to lose the privilege of doing so. CapeVerdeWave (talk) 17:37, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the recognition, re: editing tornado-related pages. When I see poor grammar or bad formatting or general misinformation, I like to take care of it. :-) Dym75 (talk) 23:51, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CapeVerdeWave. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tornado outbreak of April 2-3, 1956, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:03, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CapeVerdeWave. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tornado outbreak of April 2-3".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:11, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I guess the secret is out about that nightmare of a project lol. Help on that list is greatly appreciated if you have the time/energy for it. I worked for a straight month on it and burned myself out a bit. There are thousands upon thousands of newspapers to read and an unreasonable amount of digging for information that may have been lost to time. I think a university or two may have the original survey data from Fujita (which would be invaluable) in an archive but I don't know if it's accessible. Some of the formatting in that list is unique to that page but I did my best to find a compromise between verified research, what can be considered the most accurate, and weeding out blatant errors in a method that shouldn't violate SYNTH. Thoughts and opinions on it are also appreciated. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 18:31, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there CVW! Good to hear from you. So there are a lot of options for historic currencies. I’m not sure if there is a gold standard version, but I found this website, where you could convert 1926 British pounds to USD. I wouldn’t suggest inflating it to present. Most articles don’t have that anymore, especially since population and building costs can change over the decades. As for the article itself, there shouldn’t be a shortage of info. Do you need help with any aspects of it? Lately I’ve been editing some lists, trying to have yearly articles like Weather of 2012. I hope we eventually have articles going back to 1800, if not earlier, for the year’s weather articles. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 22:24, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I managed to find this newspaper archive from the digital library of the Caribbean, and I found at least one article from DR's main newspaper. I had trouble viewing the newspaper from Puerto Rico, it said I had to be a member, so I'm not sure if some newspapers are free or not. I found that by looking up whatever was the oldest newspaper in Santo Domingo, and happened to find that. I'm not sure if there are other archives, but this one could be a good start. As for the image, I'm pretty sure it's public domain! According to this post from Duke, anything published in 1926 entered the public domain in 2022. So in case you might be working on any storms from that year and find damage pics, if they were first published in 1926, then they are in the public domain now. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:33, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tropical Storm Jerry (2001) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tropical Storm Jerry (2001) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

''Flux55'' (talk) 15:34, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical Storm Jerry (2001) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ''Flux55'' (talk) 05:24, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]