Hi Bergenoslo! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Signed, Dinosaur TrexXX33 (chat?) 21:57, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players, and check out the (overwhelming) consensus at this discussion, instead of blindly reverting. Thank you. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 17:30, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You sent a discussion page on "Rowspanning in player international goals table", which is more than fine for me, but it has no relation with the Cap column that you removed. Kindly do not remove information from the table as the Cap column, which provides relevant information to the users. As already mentioned, please note that the Cap column is present on almost all the international striker's pages on Wikipedia.--Bergenoslo (talk) 12:59, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no consensus whatsoever to add a "cap" column. The main issue is that it is unsourced for the vast majority of players: it's very difficult to find a source that says that a specific player's third international goal was scored on his 27th cap, for example. If you want to add something to Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players, try to find consensus first at WT:FOOTY. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 13:06, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please, read WP:ACMILAN. Also, a full stop should not be added to image captions if the sentence is not a full sentence. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 13:48, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Dr Salvus 17:52, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is a prior consensus to not add injury logos or notations next to players. If you resume edit-warring on this without a change in consensus, you will be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:37, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits do not comply with the MOS at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players#International and your reverts are disruptive. I note that other editors (@Wikipediæ philosophia and Ohnoitsjamie:) have previously warned you about editing warring and disruptive edits. I suggest you stop before you end up blocked. GiantSnowman 20:39, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GiantSnowman 13:50, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Since you have been edit warring for one week, I have blocked you from editing for one week. Cullen328 (talk) 18:39, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]