You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 02:04, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, time to end this drama and victim playing. The editor has serious competency issues. In addition there are privacy issues, as Dennis Brown can attest to. Finally, I could have made this a CU block as well, since the editor saw fit to create an account to harass another administrator, with whom they were in conflict, with a series of edits so vile that none of them made it through the filter. Dennis has seen the file as well and, I assume, is keeping a copy. I am not yet revoking TPA; Dennis, or anyone else, feel free to do that if you see fit, if this drama continues. Drmies (talk) 02:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Dennis Brown - 2¢ 02:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I have revolked TPA for their own good, multiple disclosing of personal information that required revdel. This squarely fits under WP:CIR, and is supported by CU information not disclosed. Any admin reviewing should note that the editor is also under a community imposed BLP topic ban. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 02:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Drmies, Dennis Brown and the others: I'm sorry for my incorrect assumption that a topic ban from BLPs would be sufficient to deal with the situation. While I didn't technically perform the unblock, my suggestion to do so was painfully naive in hindsight. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 05:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • ~ ToBeFree, no worries--we know now what we did not know then. Drmies (talk) 14:31, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Email disabled after abuse. Drmies (talk) 14:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Agreed, same issue. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 23:58, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I don't think you need to apologize for being optimistic and believing in the best in a person. It's a characteristic I wish I could be "guilty" of more often than I am. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 07:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • It's not naïve. This editor was wrong, but did display awareness on AN/I. Had they not been brigaded there they may have been salvageable. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 18:14, 6 July 2024 (UTC).[reply]
    

A tag has been placed on Battle of Gogetti requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://profilpelajar.com/article//Battle_of_Gogetti. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mccapra (talk) 00:50, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]