Cannabis Ruderalis

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! - SUN EYE 1 16:28, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Please have a look at WP:INDICSCRIPT: avoid the use of Indic scripts in lead sections or infoboxes. Also, please go through WP:TUTORIAL, if you haven't already. utcursch | talk 13:24, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Pallava dynasty, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. - SUN EYE 1 16:28, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have already provided link there Amruth7676 (talk) 02:30, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

RegentsPark (comment) 12:45, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please use article talk pages to get consensus for your edits rather than edit warring as you are currently doing at Maratha-Mysore War (1682). --RegentsPark (comment) 12:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Should you continue with the disruptive editing mentioned above, I will be filed an enforcement request. Please discuss your propsed changes at Talk:Maratha-Mysore War (1682). Thank you. FDW777 (talk) 10:07, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration enforcement[edit]

See Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. FDW777 (talk) 14:09, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction[edit]

The following sanction now applies to you:

blocked from editing Maratha-Mysore War (1682) for 1 year

You have been sanctioned over repeatedly edit warring over the result

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. RegentsPark (comment) 16:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--RegentsPark (comment) 16:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

It is clear that you are here to push an agenda, any further disruption and your editing privileges will be withdrawn. —SpacemanSpiff 09:00, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Karnataka never recognized Malayalam as its regional language in Kodagu and Dakshina Kannada
Here is the act of 1963 which makes Kannada to be Official language in the India state of Karnataka
informationhttps://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/7524/1/26_of_1963_%28e%29.pdf Amruth7676 (talk) 15:00, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022[edit]

Please stop moving Telugu-Kannada alphabet without consensus. If you continue, you will likely see your editing privileges restricted. For initiating a process seeking consensus for a move, see Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting a single page move. Nardog (talk) 03:46, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for long term disruptive editing, especially relating to language chauvinism, no improvement in behavior despite being under an AE block. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —SpacemanSpiff 08:34, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amruth7676 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello i have read the Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks and there will be no more language chavunism in my edits and i'll always remain as a contributer in Wikipedia Amruth7676 (talk) 12:00, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is nowhere near sufficient. I think some form of topic ban is going to be required as part of unblocking you. 331dot (talk) 19:02, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 Confirmed block evasion, strengthening the block. --Yamla (talk) 11:14, 9 October 2022 (UTC)|Hello i have read the Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks and there will be no more language chavunism in my edits and i'll always remain as a contributer in Wikipedia Amruth7676 (talk) 12:00, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply