Hi AmNaTi200! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jimmy Sheirgill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Producer. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! KyloRen3 (talk) 09:34, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Ranvir Shorey, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Zai ^{(💬 • 📝 • ⚡️)} 12:53, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shefali Shah. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KyloRen3 (talk) 09:34, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 3 Idiots, you may be blocked from editing. You replaced good sources with unreliable ones. Please be mindful of Wikipedia policies. KyloRen3 (talk) 21:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Manoj Bajpayee. KyloRen3 (talk) 21:07, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I Only Added Language Section To Filmography... AmNaTi200 (talk) 21:16, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AmNaTi200, your changes seem highly unnecessary, please see the edit summaries provided by us when reverting you, and do not WP:EDITWAR. KyloRen3 (talk) 15:49, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks For The Suggestion... I Am New To Wikipedia & Want To Contribute A Lot... Please Give Me Some Time... I Will Correct My Mistakes. AmNaTi200 (talk) 08:56, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@AmNaTi200:, I hope you saw my comment below on using the Show Preview. Having 10 or 20 edits to the same page clogs up the page history. I have added another comment below on using the edit summary. Jay (talk) 01:00, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, you can ask at the help desk. Jay (talk) 08:04, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When adding budget and box office information to Indian films, please don't use the {{INRConvert}} template. There was a discussion on the WP:ICTF about this and the consensus was not to use those templates in the infobox. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 21:55, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Jay (talk) 00:57, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am finding it hard to review your edits. This is my 3rd request to you to use the Show Preview, and my 2nd request to use the Summary. Feel free to discuss if you find it hard to follow the highly recommended practices. If your edits are getting reverted, you are not being constructive.

In the last 3 days alone you made 89 edits of which only 3 had an edit summary. Each time you Save, a new version is created in the page's history. You made 11 edits in 25 minutes to Lokesh Kanagaraj, 10 edits in 20 minutes and then 9 edits in 10 minutes to Vivek Oberoi, 9 edits in 8 minutes to Sandeep Reddy Vanga, 5 edits in 2 minutes to Himmatwala (2013 film), 5 edits in 7 minutes to Guru (2007 film), 5 edits in 8 minutes to Adivi Sesh. - Jay ^Talk 17:26, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

From Now I Will Write The Reason After Every Edit. AmNaTi200 (talk) 18:11, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since then you have made 20 edits that have only 3 summaries. 6 edits in 5 minutes to Masti (2004 film), 5 edits in 4 minutes to Batla House, 7 edits in 20 minutes to Shreyas Talpade. - Jay ^Talk 20:54, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Section headings on articles should be in normal sentence capitalization - Music videos, not Music Videos as you did here [1]. See MOS:SECTIONS Ravensfire (talk) 18:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, use normal sentence capitalization for section headers, NOT title case. Read the Manual of Style page I linked. See these edits [2], [3]. This isn't fun cleaning up after your changes - I know your editing in good faith, but you've got to start taking some of these messages on your talk page to heart and change your editing style. At this point, when I see a series of edits of yours that introduce issues that you've been warned about, I'm just going to revert everything. Wikipedia strives to have the consistent look of a professional encyclopedia, and uses the Manual of Style to help editors understand how articles should look. Please, read the messages people are leaving you and use that to help become a better editor. Ravensfire (talk) 17:42, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:AmNaTi200 please stop adding MX Player in Sidharth Shukla as we only add the original platform it comes on and that is Alt Balaji. And stop your vandalism as well despite warnings given to you. The section is called Awards and Nominations not Accolades. Please understand and don’t do this again.

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to The Tashkent Files, did not appear constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. As noted above, don't use INRConvert in infoboxes Ravensfire (talk) 16:08, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not assume ownership of articles as you did at Manoj Bajpayee. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. KyloRen3 (talk) 20:09, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sanya Malhotra, you may be blocked from editing. KyloRen3 (talk) 18:48, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Shershaah, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Ab207 (talk) 12:34, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Doctor (2021 film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 10:13, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sidharth Shukla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arko.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shehnaaz Gill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arko.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Suneye1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Master (2021 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - SUN EYE 1 05:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ab207. I noticed that you recently removed content from Gangubai Kathiawadi without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not remove sourced content w/o explanation. See Talk:Gangubai Kathiawadi#Budget. Diff: [4] Ab207 (talk) 07:00, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry For Not Explaining Clearly... Actually I Removed Those Sources Because They Weren't Telling Exact Budget & Just Giving An Assumption... On The Other Hand, BOI's Article Gave Exact Budget & That's The Reason I Edited The Article... Thankyou AmNaTi200 (talk) 07:33, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Grabup. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Samrat Prithviraj have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. As per WP:ICTFSOURCES Boxofficeindia's budget should be ignored if other reliable sources found because it includes advertisement and printing costs. Grabup (talk) 01:52, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bhale Bhale Magadivoy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nani.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Karthi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You MUST include a source for your edit to add the film. There is no linked article, so there needs to be a source to support Karthi is in the film and that it's completed. Ravensfire (talk) 20:31, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Randeep Hooda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ypu have to see the page of Secret Superstar and Highest grossing Hindi Films and act accordingly and revert the edits !! Harharshit (talk) 06:42, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See the page of List of highest-grossing Hindi films also. Harharshit (talk) 06:43, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And pls revert your edit... Harharshit (talk) 06:43, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you are sure...then kindly correct the page. Harharshit (talk) 07:30, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pls fix the parent page also Harharshit (talk) 07:39, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ajay Devgn FFilms, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for updating the box office collection of Vikram movie in gross worldwide section, please update the same in 2 other sections: list of highest grossing films by language - tamil (432.5-500 crores) and list of highest grossing franchises - lokesh cinematic universe (500 crores).

Also, only 2 other films released after Vikram have grossed more than its collection, Ponniyin Selvan 1 and Pathaan. So, the peak rank for Vikram should be 18. It is currently 20, please rectify that error too. Thanks. Cinephilekrr (talk) 16:38, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page RRR (film) has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 12:38, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DaxServer: Seriously, what is the point of welcoming this user to Wikipedia now. Just have a look at the amount of prior feedback on this talk page in the last few years. Jay 💬 10:55, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jay It was just a standard user warning template. Since the user has a pattern of making the same disruptive edits, I'd suggest for an admin action [not from you as you would be WP:INVOLVED] — DaxServer (t · m · c) 12:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Kamal Haasan filmography, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 10:07, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Archer1234: AmNaTi200 is expected to be aware. See #Show preview and #Editing practices I posted in 2021. Jay 💬 10:51, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@AmNaTi200, I see above that you have been advised to use edit summaries. Note that the Help page for edit summaris says, among other things:

• Avoid vagueness. While edit summaries can be terse, they should still be specific. Providing an edit summary similar to "I made some changes" is functionally equivalent to not providing a summary at all.

Your repeated edit summaries that say only "Added Content" fit in this category of vagueness and are the equivalent of not providing a summary at all. Please do better. See Help:Edit summary for more guidance on how to write an effective edit summary.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 22:47, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dev Anand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vijay Anand.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:53, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pran (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zanjeer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Upkar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pran.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The concept of the lead section of an article is that "the lead section is an introduction to an article and a summary of its most important contents." (See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section) So it is not appropriate to delete information from the lead section of an article on the grounds that there's already a separate section for citizenship... no need to mention the same thing here. Your edit to the article on Akshay Kumar has therefore been reverted. -- Toddy1 (talk) 09:02, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For converting Dharmendra's filmography to table format. DareshMohan (talk) 16:38, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks A Lot... Will Continue To Help Making Wikipedia More Informative & Easy To Read. AmNaTi200 (talk) 16:47, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anupam Kher filmography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intelligence Bureau.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My Apologies AmNaTi200 (talk) 06:10, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:ICTFSOURCES. All the sources which were listed under Reliable sources are reliable. Only only Pinkvilla, Bollywood Hungama Or Box Office India. Juvalkjolly (talk) 11:11, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @AmNaTi200. I am @Archer1234. I noticed your recent edit to Bobby Deol where you updated the gross receipts for Animal.

Thank you for that update. However, please remember to update the date and access-date of the reference when you update the value of the gross receipts. I have done that for you here. Thank you. Happy editing.  — Archer (t·c) 18:18, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Bro 👍 AmNaTi200 (talk) 18:31, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 — Archer (t·c) 21:22, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 — Archer (t·c) 21:29, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Tusk001. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.

You have been consistently adding incorrect collections and unreliable sources such as Pinkvilla. Please refrain from doing so. There are numerous trustworthy references available for the collections of 'Lucifer' and 'Pulimurugan,' like Indian Express, Kerala Kaumudi, and many more, which have already been added to the talk page to avoid conflicts and have been discussed multiple times before. If this continues, there's a risk of being blocked. Kindly ensure the accuracy of the information you contribute. Tusk001 (talk) 04:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Who Told You That Pinkvilla Is An Unreliable Source... Instead The Sources You Have Mentioned Aren't Even Box Office Tracking Sites. AmNaTi200 (talk) 06:11, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While there are numerous Malayalam box office tracking sites such as ForumKeralam and FridayMatinee, their reliability has been questioned.

Similarly, Pinkvilla, a popular entertainment news portal, is not considered a reliable source on Wikipedia WP:TOI.Unless it is an official tracking system , these platforms may not be considered reliable sources. In contrast, reputable sources like Indian Express are acknowledged and accepted as reliable references on the platform. Tusk001 (talk) 11:55, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I Checked The List... No Where Pinkvilla Is Mentioned As An Unreliable Source. AmNaTi200 (talk) 12:39, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If Pinkvilla is so reliable then why don't you update Dunki (film) bo according to this source? Go ahead please VarunVK (talk) 10:58, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please Go Ahead... Collections Mentioned From Box Office India, Bollywood Hungama & Pinkvilla Are Reliable & Can Be Used For Any Film. AmNaTi200 (talk) 11:23, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes they might be reliable but not for South movies. Infact Bollywood Hungama doesn't even provide total WW gross figures of many South movies incl. recent releases like Salaar, Jailer and Leo etc.. because these sites are Bollywood sources. VarunVK (talk) 13:54, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First Of All... Bollywood Hungama Doens't Provides Collections Of South Indian Films... So We Use Pinkvilla Or Box Office India For Them. AmNaTi200 (talk) 13:57, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would like to ask how even pinkvilla and box office India is trusted by you. they don't even show the correct and accurate box office numbers for the south Indian films like Pushpa, Kantara, KGF 2. we can trust the trade Analyst Manobala Vijayabalan who accurately tells the box office collection and overall box office in twitter. These are reliable articles below regarding the BO numbers of Salaar. Here are some references.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/telugu/movies/box-office/salaar-box-office-collection-day-11-prabhas-starrer-globally-mints-rs-650-crore/articleshow/106464485.cms?from=mdr

https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/regional-cinema/story/salaar-box-office-day-11-prabhas-film-marching-towards-rs-650-crore-globally-2483022-2024-01-02

https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/telugu/salaar-box-office-collection-day-13-prabhas-starrer-third-biggest-telugu-grosser-after-baahubali-2-rrr-crosses-rs-650-crore-worldwide-9094458/

https://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/telugu-cinema/salaar-worldwide-box-office-collection-day-13-prabhas-film-baahubali-2-rrr-south-blockbusters-650-crore-101704352612822.html

please see to this and update Salaar box office accordingly and don't take false box office collection on south Indian movies just because either you might hate south Indian movies or only want to show box office figures of south Indian in small lengths and show high lengths in bollywood --Guru Deepak y (talk) 17:49, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Rajesh Khanna

added links pointing to Chetan Anand, Aradhana, Dushman and Haathi Mere Saathi

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou For Pointing Out The Small Mistakes. I Have Corrected Them. AmNaTi200 (talk) 18:03, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Sholay into Dharmendra. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Also, when copying within Wikipedia, please be sure to copy over the supporting citations and source books to the destination article. — Diannaa (talk) 14:36, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. AmNaTi200 (talk) 14:41, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Dharmendra

added a link pointing to Mystery

Rajesh Khanna

added a link pointing to Romance

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:52, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I Mentioned Them To Point Out The Genre... Didn't Knew It'll Move To A Disambiguation Page... Sorry... Correcting My Mistake Right Now. AmNaTi200 (talk) 18:41, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rajesh Khanna, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:30, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Will120. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been disallowed by an edit filter as they did not appear constructive. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. If you believe the edit filter disallowance was a false positive, please report it here. Feel free to ask for assistance at the Teahouse whenever you like. Thank you. Will120 (talk) 20:05, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can You Please Tell Me Which Of My Edit Didn't Seemed Constructive AmNaTi200 (talk) 20:10, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Check the link provided by Will. The filter triggers from this year are for adding self-published/blog sources at Jeetendra, Manoj Kumar, Dharmendra and Rajesh Khanna. Jay 💬 07:14, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Blogs Added As Sources Are From Box Office India Which Is A Reputed Box Office Site... No Personal Blogs Have Been Added As Sources. AmNaTi200 (talk) 12:23, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) I have not been able to find any evidence that the blogspot for boxofficeindiarecords is the official or verified blog for Boxofficeindia.com, which is a reliable source as discussed at RSN and affirmed at WP:ICTFSOURCES. I checked the records at both for an actor (Govinda) and the data between the two sites is not the same for that actor (but you should compare them yourself to be sure I am not missing something). So, I think the provenance of the data at boxofficeindiarecords at blogspot is unknown and questionable versus what is accepted at Boxofficeindia.com. But if I am overlooking something, don't hesitate to point it out. Probably worth a discussion at ICTF.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 17:58, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Data On It's Site Is After 1993 And On It's Blog It's From Start Of The Career... There Can Be Some Very Minor Differences, But The Data Is 100% Authentic And Should Be Allowed To Use For Adding Proper Information To One's Wikipedia Page. AmNaTi200 (talk) 18:07, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do we verify that the data at the blog is authentic?  — Archer1234 (t·c) 18:09, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Box Office India Is Heavily Used As A Source By Editors And Also It's One Of The Rare Sites Which Track Collections And Have Very Well Organised Data, Especially For Films From The Old Era. AmNaTi200 (talk) 18:12, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When you say "Box Office India" do you mean Boxofficeindia.com or boxofficeindiarecords.blogspot.com or both?  — Archer1234 (t·c) 18:16, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Both... Box office India Blogspot belongs to box office India only. The site has data starting from 1993 while the Blogspot has data from 1940s-present. AmNaTi200 (talk) 18:22, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know what you assert here is true? Is there any evidence (other than your word) to which can you refer us that substantiates a formal/certified relationship between the two sites? Are there any published reports as to who owns and operates boxofficeindiarecords.blogspot.com and the owner/operator's relationship with Boxofficeindia.com?  — Archer1234 (t·c) 18:33, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Articles Written By The Site Are Kept In The Blogspot... Like Information About Clashes, Information Regarding Big Box Office Blockbusters Such As Kranti, DDLJ Etc So It's Obvious That The Blogspot Is Run By Box Office India Only... Regarding The Authenticity... The Site Is Used By Many Of The Editors For Films So I Think It's Right To Say That It's Data Is Authentic. AmNaTi200 (talk) 18:46, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I still see no evidence provided other than your assertion that this is true. It might very well be true, but I have no way of knowing because all I have is your word which, like my own word, is not reliable. I'll give it one more try here and if the reply doesn't appear to address the point, I'll start a new discussion over at WP:ICTF or WP:RSN, where perhaps others can explore the topic more fully. Can you provide a URL to a reliable source that verifies your claims?  — Archer1234 (t·c) 18:51, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://m.timesofindia.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/box-office/box-office-figures-who-can-you-trust/articleshow/57001593.cms?

This Source Confirms My Claim. AmNaTi200 (talk) 19:17, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which line exactly in the article? Can you highlight the line? Jay 💬 19:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It supports use of Boxofficeindia.com, but I do not see boxofficeindiarecords.blogspot.com referred to anywhere. Perhaps I missed it. You appear to be claiming (correct me if I'm wrong) that boxofficeindiarecords.blogspot.com has a relationship with Boxofficeindia.com, but I see no published reliable source that would support that claim. Boxofficeindia.com has been judged to be a reliable source at WP:RSN. I see no corresponding judgement with respect to boxofficeindiarecords.blogspot.com.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 19:27, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) The filter is triggered by boxofficeindiarecords.blogspot.com which is private. Jay 💬 18:00, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As Far As I Understand... Private Means From A Person And Not A Reputed Site Which Is Often Used As A Source. AmNaTi200 (talk) 18:08, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jeetendra, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:11, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeetendra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mulzim.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou For Pointing Out.. Error Corrected AmNaTi200 (talk) 08:25, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in these changes, you have removed the mention of Disco Dancer from the section, arguably the film that brought the subject into limelight, along with its popularity in Russia which is notable. Restore them. Second, refrain from using Cinestaan and sources like that which are not considered reliable. Use WP:ICTF compliant sources only. Also avoid Box Office India, though reliable, better articles should be used when talking about a subject's career then merely extrapolating from box office records. Consider these things in all articles you edit. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:45, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disco Dancer Will Be Added In Stardom Section... Sorry For Using Cinestaan, But Box Office India Needs To Be Used Because We Are Talking About A Star And A Star's Achievements Have Very Much To Do With Box Office Numbers. AmNaTi200 (talk) 16:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mithun Chakraborty, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Musical and Ghar Ek Mandir.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shashi Kapoor, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Amjad Khan and Pran.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:01, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Correcting It Instantly. AmNaTi200 (talk) 18:02, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Amitabh Bachchan. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia.
In particular please stop using unencyclopedic language - thank you - Arjayay (talk) 14:50, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will strongly second this comment. Section headings of "Megastardom" are NOT something you should see in an encyclopedia. A tabloid article or blog - great! Professional writing - never. Our writing should be more towards professional in tone, not tabloid. Ravensfire (talk) 15:08, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Megastardom Or Superstardom Isn't Used For Everyone... But Only For Few In Bachchan's Case There Are Various Sources Which Confirm Megastar Status. AmNaTi200 (talk) 15:32, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a hype-driven label, it's not professional writing. If you tried to take that article to Featured Article status, I guarantee that would need to be changed. Yes, I'm aware in you can find sources that use that article. They're written in a more casual, fan-based style which is not the goal of Wikipedia. We are supposed to strive to NOT use labels like that, but be professional in our tone and writing. Ravensfire (talk) 21:33, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rajesh Khanna, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:32, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ashok Kumar, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:19, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ashok Kumar, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:19, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ashok Kumar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mr. India.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CodeTalker. I noticed that you recently removed content from Salman Khan without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CodeTalker (talk) 20:48, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shashi Kapoor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:58, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raaj Kumar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telugu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:47, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raaj Kumar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neel Kamal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeetendra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Karmayogi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:53, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]