I'd like to apologize for this. It was completely uncalled for on my part. I'm not typically one to call people out for anything they did wrong (not that you did), but especially not preemptively. It's not an excuse but sometimes I get tired of pushing for things to go certain ways and eventually get to the point where it pushes me over the edge, which is where I felt this was eventually going. As I said over on that talk page, after looking at more sources there doesn't appear to be any uniform uses with every source referring to it differently, we could honestly go either way. Won't get too much further into that though as discussion regarding that should stay on the articles talk page. We may have had a few disagreements on how to handle certain things but most of the time we come to a mutual agreement and because of that we've never had a serious problem. Ideally things will stay that way. I hope you will accept my apology and I promise it will not ever happen again. TheDoctorWho (talk) 14:39, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited War of the Sontarans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dan Starkey.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

The article Doctor Who (series 12) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Doctor Who (series 12) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of [[User:{{subst:Dege31}}|{{subst:Dege31}}]] -- [[User:{{subst:Dege31}}|{{subst:Dege31}}]] ([[User talk:{{subst:Dege31}}|talk]]) 17:21, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		For great efforts in bringing an entire series of articles to GA class and years of continued, solid work Dege31 (talk) 17:37, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Much appreciated. -- /Alex/₂₁ 23:23, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed that you are a template editor and that you're around. I tried to close WP:ANEW#User:Mcphurphy reported by User:Vice_regent (Result: Indefinitely blocked; article fully protected one week) with the templates Atop and Abot, but it closed only part of the thread. I'm assuming there is something in the rather complex formatting used by the editors that is preventing it from closing fully. Could you maybe take a look? Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

@Bbb23  Done! There seemed to have been a conflict between {{atop}}/{{abottom}} and {{reflist}}/{{notelist}}, so I've moved the latter templates to the end of the section. -- /Alex/₂₁ 23:35, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

You're a prince! --Bbb23 (talk) 23:42, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Alex 21. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Batwoman episodes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM —¿philoserf? (talk) 00:51, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

@Philoserf Haven't watched the episode, can't fix the problem. Don't remove tags if you don't intend to fix the problem yourself; WP:MTR may help educate you on how and when to remove these tags. Happy editing! -- /Alex/₂₁ 01:00, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Why this? Isn't that against WP:REDYES? Vanjagenije (talk) 17:56, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Tagged with {{Redlinks}}. Restore them only where appropriate. -- /Alex/₂₁ 01:07, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

		Holiday cheer
		Here is a snowman a gift a boar's head and something blue for your listening pleasure. Enjoy and have a wonderful 2022 A. MarnetteD|Talk 03:08, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2022!

Hello Alex 21, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2022. Happy editing, TheDoctorWho (talk) 05:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Thanks for uploading File:Teen Wolf Intertitle.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Template:Aired episodes/auto has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:58, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

This material is covered in more detail in the release section and it omits the significant US premiere info. This info is duplicated in a more appropriate section. I see your reason for not wanting USA info, but it is usual for WP articles to include that data. --Zeamays (talk) 13:34, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Again: the lead summarizes the entire article, per WP:LEAD. Thus, the lead summarizes the information about the release, and the Release section goes into it in significant detail. It is not "usual" to include it, except for American series. If it's not an American series, then we don't include the American release date, per MOS:TV. This is English-language server, not the American server. -- Alex_21 _TALK 13:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

@Zeamays Pinging you in the above reply, per my talkpage notice above; my bad. -- Alex_21 _TALK 13:44, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

I still maintain you are wrong. Also, you misspelled program. --Zeamays (talk) 13:49, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

@Zeamays How am I wrong? Kindly elaborate. Programme is the British spelling of the word; kindly educate yourself, nothing is misspelled. Happy editing! -- Alex_21 _TALK 15:36, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Directors in infobox, would the top 5 directors (with most episodes directing) be allowed? If so, return to top 5 in list, each has directed three or four episodes. The others directed two or one. I'll abide by your decision.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 01:50, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

@Shaidar cuebiyar I'd see no issue with that, the five directors who have helmed the most episodes. Thank you for improving the article; it's on my watchlist, which is why I've one or two changes as you proceed. -- Alex_21 _TALK 01:53, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

I don't mind your useful edits as I go along. As you can tell I'm working my way through Episode summaries for now. Keep up your good works.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 01:57, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Template:Television Rotten Tomatoes scores/separate has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 14:30, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi Alex - the reasons Absent Friends was cancelled is one piece of information. The fact that Black Knight was produced as a replacement is another. There's no reason to combine this into one note that tells the reader more than they wanted to know. If they're looking for the reason Absent Friends was cancelled, then they only need to know about the Barrowman issue. If they want to know why the Black Knight's numbering is weird, they only need to know that it's a replacement. It's unnecessary to overload the note with redundant information. I'm not sure what's confusing about that. As for making the text small on Absent Friends I can only assume that's an aesthetic preference on your part but it's inconsistent. Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AtticusFink6 (talk • contribs)

If they're looking for the reason Absent Friends was cancelled, they can read just that one sentence. If they want to know why the Black Knight's numbering is weird, they can read just that one sentence. I'm not sure what's confusing about that. Two sentences is not too much to read, that's quite the funny notion. -- Alex_21 _TALK 12:18, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

It's just about information flow, there's no need to be smug. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AtticusFink6 (talk • contribs)

It's two sentences, try to spruce up your level of understanding to be able to read that far. Also, sign your posts. -- Alex_21 _TALK 13:39, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

I don't think the fact that your older and this is how you spend your time is the gotcha you think it is, kid. AtticusFink6 (talk) 14:13, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Good job, you signed your post, buddy! Proud of you. :) -- Alex_21 _TALK 14:24, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi Alex! It's been a long time. I hope all is well.

I am here to ask for your input on what's happened since the discussion here. I remember you and I starting the debate on whether to include such tables for ratings. There is currently a discussion at Talk:List of Chicago Med episodes#Ratings table regarding its accessibility issues. Perhaps it's something to discuss again? Callmemirela 🍁 ^talk 02:16, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the message! I'll absolutely reply there. -- Alex_21 _TALK 02:24, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

sir when you visite arrowverse page and after scrolling down when you keep your mouse at arrow then a small summary came and without picture but when you place you mouse at any other tv show on this page like flash or batwoman then with summary a photo also appear so how to can we place a photo above summary of arrow when you keep you mouse at arrow show (dont click on arrow just plzce your mouse on it)

Hi Alex. YoungForever and I thought we restarted the discussion about the ratings graph here. Feel free to comment if you wish. Callmemirela 🍁 ^talk 21:21, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

I was about to start a talk page thread about the "October" of the DW BBC centenary since it was unsourced and I hadn't seen anything so specific, so that saved me (I didn't think the thanks button was enough to convey what the thanks was for)--CreecregofLife (talk) 22:47, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, no worries! It's very likely airing in October, but given that we don't have a source stating so... I may add that into the hidden note too. -- Alex_21 _TALK 22:52, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Admittedly it didn't occur to me why October, even though it probably should have. As I said, I saw nothing so specific, and that includes the founding date. I even get why September is out of the question (10 day window to be "autumn") even before I made the realization. CreecregofLife (talk) 22:58, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Alex 21. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Walking Dead: World Beyond (season 1), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Alex 21,

Thank you for creating Samurai Rabbit: The Usagi Chronicles.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add a reception section with details of reviews of the series in reliable sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Atlantic306}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Atlantic306 (talk) 00:22, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

I greatly apologize for my conduct back in the day, specifically my harsh accusations that could easily be interpreted as personal attacks. In fact I had even realized I went too far at the time, so I rewrote the offending talk page section focusing entirely on the content issues.

However, as far as I am aware it has been years since we crossed paths on the wiki at all, let alone in a hostile manner. I would therefore ask that you please remove my username from User:Alex 21/Editors.

This is about more than the wall of shame itself; it's personal. I really don't want to be on your – or any constructive Wikipedia editor's – bad side anymore. Modernponderer (talk) 05:00, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Alex. As an editor who's edited this article, what's your opinion on citing a university student writing for their school's paper as a music critic on this article, and placing a prose section after the track listing? (Going against the order of sections outlined at MOS:ALBUM...) Ss112 12:50, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Alex 21. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Batwoman episodes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:31, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I see you've added Power episodes and airing dates under Spin-offs, is there any reason why that is adequate because the details of the series are listed in the infobox?Neo the Twin (talk) 17:01, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

@Neo the Twin Franchise tables typically have all series included in the overview; consider the tables shown at articles like Star Wars, Star Trek, the Arrowverse, etc. However, given that there is no Power (franchise) article, this means that the franchise table needs to exist under "Spin-offs", and thus it should be included there for comparison to the related spin-offs. Having all of the episode counts and airing dates together simply makes it easier for readers. -- Alex_21 _TALK 12:40, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Precious

Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:11, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

I did a lot of editing & trimming on those plot summaries (they were the usual mess you find in articles about popular shows & movies). But I don't know how the templates should be managed so didn't remove them. - Special-T (talk) 17:26, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

No worries! It's now just the final episode that's over MOS:TVPLOT's 200 word limit, so I simply moved the tag from the entire season to just that episode. Good work on trimming the summaries down. -- Alex_21 _TALK 01:49, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello Alex, I was wondering if you changed the boys from critically acclaimed to generally positive in terms of reception. If you did, can you change it back? I really love this show, and I'm hoping it reaches a wider audience. I also think it is one of the most well-written and well-acted shows I've ever seen. It is definitely the best superhero show ever made. I just hope you don't mind that I change it from generally positive to critically acclaimed because almost every media reviewer that I've seen praises the show. I also heard from Forbes and many other media/critic sites that it's one of television's most audacious satires. Engprat (talk) 19:44, 23 July 2022 (UTC) Engprat (talk) 19:44, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

@Engprat You need a source that supports that it is "critically acclaimed", and not your own personal opinion. Do you have such a source? If not, you need to stop making the edits, else you may be facing administrators and having to explain why you're edit-warring. -- Alex_21 _TALK 22:52, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Here are the sources Alex. I just want to say that, before, the series was labeled as critically acclaimed on wikipedia, but then it was changed to generally positive. I'm curious as to why?

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/the_boys_2019/s03

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/the_boys_2019/s02

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/the_boys_2019/s01

https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/jun/03/the-boys-series-three-review-still-hilarious-ultraviolent-and-brilliant

https://www.looper.com/883256/the-boys-season-3-has-critics-picking-their-jaws-up-off-the-floor/

https://collider.com/the-boys-season-3-review-karl-urban-antony-starr-prime-video/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/paultassi/2022/06/03/the-boys-season-3-reviews-are-in-and-they-are-stellar/

https://www.cinemablend.com/television/2572701/how-the-boys-critical-success-for-season-2-should-inspire-stranger-things-and-more-hit-streaming-shows

https://readysteadycut.com/2022/07/03/renewed-or-cancelled-will-there-be-a-season-4-of-the-boys-amazon-original-series/ Engprat (talk) 23:30, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

here are some more sources:

https://www.ign.com/articles/the-boys-season-3-review

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/the_boys_2019/s03/reviews

https://vulkk.com/2022/07/12/the-boys-season-3-review-and-breakdown/

https://www.cnet.com/culture/entertainment/the-boys-season-3-review-the-perfect-antidote-to-marvel-fatigue/

https://www.denofgeek.com/tv/the-boys-season-3-review/

https://www.denofgeek.com/tv/the-boys-season-3-episode-8-finale-review/

Is this enough to be deemed "critically acclaimed"? If you need more proof, go to Youtube, and search The Boys series review. Pretty much every youtuber will tell you this show is phenomenal. Engprat (talk) 23:50, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Which of those sources specifically state that it is critically acclaimed? YouTuber's are irrelevant and non-sensical here on Wikipedia, they bear zero weight. -- Alex_21 _TALK 02:43, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Here are the ones that say it:

https://www.looper.com/883256/the-boys-season-3-has-critics-picking-their-jaws-up-off-the-floor/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/paultassi/2022/06/03/the-boys-season-3-reviews-are-in-and-they-are-stellar/?sh=42cb50066290

https://www.cinemablend.com/television/2572701/how-the-boys-critical-success-for-season-2-should-inspire-stranger-things-and-more-hit-streaming-shows

https://www.ign.com/articles/the-boys-season-3-review

https://www.cnet.com/culture/entertainment/the-boys-season-3-review-the-perfect-antidote-to-marvel-fatigue/

https://www.denofgeek.com/tv/the-boys-season-3-review/ Engprat (talk) 03:12, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Critical acclaim is when critics praise it enthusiastically. In every link, critics praise this show very enthusiastically. That is critical acclaim. If you click on all the links, the critics praise this show endlessly. It's not generally positive, its critically acclaimed. Please just let that one change stay. Engprat (talk) 03:23, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Why are you reporting me and my friend? I literally gave you all the sources proving my point. Engprat (talk) 14:01, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Because you have violated two policies, WP:EW and WP:MEAT, and forced your opinion on what the sources say, rather than what they say directly, which is not "critical acclaim". -- Alex_21 _TALK 15:10, 24 July 2022 (UTC)