just wanted to let you know, im using an unblocked VPN and have a poop tonne of IP addresses, and I am clearly trying to include something in this article, so if you could just stop undoing what i edit, that would be great. I can keep doing this forever and you can't, because you are constrained to one IP address, so if you want to make this easier on yourself, just stop and let me do what i do best :) 198.23.71.99 (talk) 21:53, 11 May 2014 (UTC)Anon[reply]

fuck you idiot — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lolololol1243 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You a whole bitch idgaf if you block me nigga. It didn't fit in her pussy i 2flows have the smallest dick on earth. ☺☺☺ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobflex (talk • contribs) 00:26, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

for your work on Trap (music genre), looks a lot better now! filelakeshoe (talk) 18:39, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"(producer)" could mean he produces anything, film, TV, not just music. "(record producer)" is more precise on what he does. QuasyBoy (talk) 23:04, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. If it's no bother, would you like to voice your support/oppose and comment at my FA nomination of Confusion (album)? It's a relatively short article to review. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Dan56 (talk) 22:28, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The V-Nasty article is looking alot better now. I'm think of withdrawing the AfD with more improvements... LiberatorLX (talk) 04:44, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@LiberatorLX: Appreciate it, I'm planning on making more improvements, I'll let you know when I'm done. 2Flows (talk) 10:41, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification, 2Flows. I am simply including recent work he has cataloged. We have permission to include all new work and correct any misinformation, as well as delete any information he doesn't want to have on the page (i.e. instruments). Thanks so much.

--Vanessanderson (talk) 18:46, 11 September 2013 (UTC)vanderson[reply]

Looks like there is a lot of beef going on with Southside and some of the other more minor members of 808 Mafia. You might want to check out Southside's twitter feed. TM88 is officially out. Jaye Neutron and more likely J. Moss could be out too. However, Southside did not make any straight up ".... is out of 808" like he did with TM88. A sample of tweets include [1], [2] and [3]. It looks like Jaye Neutron and J.Moss deleted most of the tweets they posted, but it might be too soon to make a call and straight up move them to past members. We know that none of the major sources XXL, The Source, HHDX, etc. are going to be reporting this since they are more minor members of the group. I mean they did not even report TM88 leaving the group, and he was like their third in command. What do you think? STATic message me! 00:48, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@STATicVapor: I am not even sure if TM88 officially left or they are just having some beef and throwing such "statements" around. TM just put out a new song, which got 808 Mafia tag all over it. I checked Southside's Twitter few days ago, and he was just saying how he's the CEO and him and TM claiming credit for various tracks. Now I see he's on to other members, too, but I wouldn't call them past members till someone states explicitly that they are. It doesn't need to be a major publication, but a message stating "past member / has left" from any of the involved's official Twitter should do. 2Flows (talk) 21:54, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I feel the same, a few IPs have been making the changes so I felt it needed to be covered. The new song would have the 808 Mafia tag since it was more then likely produced before all this drama. It would waste too much time to go back into it and change it. If it continues heavily I will request protection at WP:RFPP. STATic message me! 22:41, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@STATicVapor: Do you think that's a reliable source about Lex? [4] In the intro of their debut mixtape, released in October 2012, Southside speaks that 808 Mafia consists of himself + Lex + others. This is over a year after the publication says Lex had left, which doesn't make sense to me. 2Flows (talk) 16:38, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I mean I thought so, the source is XXL and its a profile of 808 Mafia to a degree (abit focused on Southside and TM88) but hmmmm. I have noticed Lex has really distanced himself from 808, now forming Low Pros and signing to Fool's Gold Records, so it does make sense. Did he appear on their most recent mixtape or has he collaborated with any of them significantly recently? Southside might have just said that to give the group more name value for their debut, since Lex's name is associated with them. STATic message me! 17:01, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@STATicVapor: I don't think Lex is a member anymore either, I haven't seen a 808 Mafia-credited song, produced by him in ages. And as you said he's working on new projects now. I just doubt the fact he left as early as 2011. But since XXL says so, I guess we can go with it. 2Flows (talk) 17:51, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good call. I completely missed seeing them in the body copy. --Tenebrae (talk) 23:59, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the section that I did because it doesn't fit in in the Wikipedia narrative and m.o. Wiki is a platform based on integrity and accuracy. What was mentioned in the section I removed were falsehoods, probably published by vandals. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.79.82.194 (talk) 22:38, 8 May 2014

Every statement in the section you removed had references to reliable sources, such as major publications Billboard and The Source. Please read Wikipedia's policy on reliable sources. 2Flows (talk) 18:04, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2Flows. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring.
Message added 22:12, 11 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A Wild Abigail Appears! _{Capture me. Moves.} 22:12, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you put two sources [5] [6] (which are says pop ballad) to "Composition" section (next to "... pop ballad;")? Hope it match, but make sure the same link on "References" section in this case. 183.171.177.113 (talk) 13:23, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your message. I see the statement you described is already referenced from a Rolling Stone article, so there is no need to add more sources. 2Flows (talk) 19:29, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. — MusikAnimal ^talk 06:02, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, MusikAnimal :) 2Flows (talk) 19:29, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 2Flows,

I highly value your contributions to Wikipedia, and your copy-editing skills are very accurate. I would like to ask you if you could make edits to the page of Expedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expedia), as there is some information missing from the page. Would you be willing to make edits to the page so that it's complete? The main areas that I think needs more information are the infobox on the top right, and external links.

To be specific, I think the infobox at top right needs more information, and fields more in line with other global travel brands like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TripAdvisor, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trivago or and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vodafone_Hutchison_Australia. The infobox also needs to change URLs to be within 'website' (at the bottom) rather than 'Web address' (at the top), and it needs to include links to Expedia ccTLD: US, CA, UK, AU & NZ (in that order) in the same shape as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trivago In regards to external Links, I think it should link to Expedia ccTLD in the same shape as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TripAdvisor with the same links as on #3.

Let me know, I would highly appreciate your assistance in this matter.

Erexkiss (talk) 12:38, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Erexkiss, thanks for your message. I see some of the other editors you asked have already taken care of your request. 2Flows (talk) 19:29, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I noticed you reverted my change in the introductory sentece of the White privilege page.

I explained myself in the Talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:White_privilege#Proposed_wording_for_opening_sentence

Could you please explain your decision to me? I don't see how my change was WP:NOTOPINION considering the fact that following my addition of the word supposedly the introduction also contains words like unspoken and presumed.

Thank you

ACanadianToker (talk) 17:24, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure I Came To Dig is vandalism? It looks like no context to me, as it looks like a good faith creation. Thanks. --Lixxx235 (talk) 19:02, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Lixxx235. The page had already been speedily deleted twice today, and considering the new content it had (something among the lines of "do not delete this page") and the creator's other edits (which include adding "Do not delete my pages" to his talk page) and history of creating inappropriate articles, I concluded it counts as vandalism. It seems that the admin who deleted the page agreed with that. 2Flows (talk) 22:50, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. Just wondering. --Lixxx235 (talk) 23:23, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was right 2flows I was right go to the bling ring group wiki gabby nears is not part of it Diana tomayo is so you can stop changing it I did research ass— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jinthedemon (talk • contribs) 20:25, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jinthedemon. If you change factual information in an article please provide a reliable source that supports the new information. You can read more here. Unless you provide a reliable source, your edits may be reverted again. And please keep civil in your comments. 2Flows (talk) 20:37, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 2Flows. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Big T, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes specific claims of importance and content is not overly promotional. Suggest AFD instead. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 01:54, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How you know these people info is what id like to know!? How accurate are you with the sources of the information you getting! ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mssfgiants (talk • contribs) 04:10, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mssfgiants, unfortunately I do not understand what you're asking. What do you refer to as "these people info"? 2Flows (talk) 19:45, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the last section on Cary Grant's personal life because I consider it slander. I don't see how it it relevant to include, Grant himself denied being gay along with members of his family. Including those accusations about Grant on his page only makes a respected actor look bad. It's basically gossip, so why should it be included? The section I removed is pointless to include on his page since it has been refuted by his family. Its just slander. That is why I removed it. So if you could restore my edits that would be great. Thanks Jgormanart (talk) 21:30, 17 July 2014 (UTC) Jgormanart (talk)[reply]

Hello, Jgormanart. The information you removed was well referenced, and since you did not provide an edit summary to explain your removal, your edit was reverted. If you think you have a valid point, please discuss the matter on the article's talk page. You can note there have been previous related discussions, such as Talk:Cary Grant#Sexuality issue in current article and Talk:Cary Grant#Sexuality. Since both are quite old, you can start a new section at the bottom of the article. 2Flows (talk) 21:41, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's bogus! That garbage would never be included in a real encyclopedia. So you can slander whoever you want, as long as it is sourced right? And the person isn't alive to defend themselves. I guess wikipedia isn't big on integrity.

Check at https://boards dot 4chan dot org/b/thread/560978173/69-decides-which-wikipage-we-edit-go for a anonymous mass raid at that article being planned and commenced, cleanup may be required — Preceding unsigned comment added by IrritatingCobalt (talk • contribs) 20:50, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"I can make protracted maintance tags to obstruct the article". Nice try ID: 3lfaAkDF, but no. 2Flows (talk) 20:53, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I feel this article is un-notable and is very biased to matriarchy and is promotional of the organisation, and also I did not see any criticism or any other viewpoints — Preceding unsigned comment added by IrritatingCobalt (talk • contribs) 16:52, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, IrritatingCobalt. I do not feel any of the tags you added to that article were appropriate so I removed them. First, I don't see how an article about a group which has disbanded in 1973 can be outdated, without presence of recent related events. Second, most of the article has sufficient inline citations. And third, I disagree about the claim the article is promotional - as I read through it, I would say it is following WP:NPOV. Also, based on your edit history, I can see that this is not the first time you have added inappropriate tags to articles, e.g. [7], [8], [9], all over the past 2 days. Considering your comment here, where you stated "I can make protracted maintance tags to obstruct the article" (22:40) and three minutes later added a bunch of inappropriate tags (22:43), I would suggest that you stop attempting to troll WikiPedia, and do some useful contributions instead. 2Flows (talk) 17:09, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Children could have viewed the innapropriate content the /b/ vandals inserted and they could repeat the information said to someone they know and then they sign a petition to delete Wikipedia for being non-12 year old nub friendly — Preceding unsigned comment added by IrritatingCobalt (talk • contribs) 17:15, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kittens are nice

IrritatingCobalt (talk) 14:17, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It would be appreciated if you looked over and voted on the move request for "The Pink Print" to the "The Pinkprint". Up to this point there hasn't been a direct response as to which spelling was correct. Nicki Minaj herself clarified the question directly stating it was written, "The Pinkprint", (https://twitter.com/NICKIMINAJ/status/497117375712329728). Leave either your support or opposition for the move here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Pink_Print#Requested_move_06_August_2014. Thank you for your time, KaneZolanski (talk) 00:14, 7 August 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Hello! Your submission of ILoveMakonnen at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ќמшמφטтгמ^torque 17:14, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]