Hi 25Abhi7234! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Storchy (talk) 13:49, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Finfish and fins, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Storchy (talk) 21:14, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! 25Abhi7234, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 01:56, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Finfish and fins. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Fish. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Fish. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Storchy (talk) 10:17, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Fish, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   12:27, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 25Abhi7234

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Study tips for Exams in India, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 08:57, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Study Techniques is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Study Techniques until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GedUK  13:25, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the English-language Wikipedia, and as such, it is an entirely reasonable expectation of contributors that they display at least some degree of competence in the English language. Since it seems quite evident to me from your recent contributions that your competence in that regard is marginal, you should probably instead consider contributing to a one of the many other Wikipedia projects - we have Wikipedias in many other languages, most of which would benefit greatly from further input: see List of Wikipedias. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with @AndyTheGrump. Your contributions to the article Study Techniques are just terrible examples of the English language. It is very hard to even guess what you may mean. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:13, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. If English is not your native language (and being from India as you say on your user page, this may be the case), you may find that working on an Indian language wiki to be more productive. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:57, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for your feed back. 25Abhi7234 (talk) 15:00, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are wikis in Malayam, Tamil, Tulu, Kannada, and other languages. Please feel free to find the language that suits you best. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:04, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

25Abhi7234, since you seem not to have understood what you have been told, and are continuing with your efforts to include your inappropriate and ungrammatical material into Wikipedia, [1], I am going to explain this to you in simple terms: carry on as you are doing, and you will almost certainly be blocked from editing the English-language Wikipedia. You are wasting your own time, and other peoples time, adding content which simply doesn't belong here. Find something more useful to do, somewhere else. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:33, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article building is one of the important think after the basic outline of the Article. Only Techniques are listed. PDF will also include in the Articles reference. It will take time to Edit the main issue like the Competence in the Language. 25Abhi7234 (talk) 13:16, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Study Techniques. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – study skills. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at study skills. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. UtherSRG (talk) 14:17, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AndyTheGrump (talk) 11:13, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Reduce the Addiction on sex. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Sexual_addiction#Treatment. Because of the duplication, your article has been speedily deleted. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Sexual_addiction#Treatment. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think the article you created should have remained separate, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. UtherSRG (talk) 11:32, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain namespaces ((Article)) for a period of 1 week for WP:DISRUPTION. Please discuss at WP:ANI. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:02, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by BuySomeApples was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

BuySomeApples (talk) 19:01, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ford Island. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Aoi (青い) (talk) 19:17, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Pathiramanal. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:02, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Pathiramanal. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Aoi (青い) (talk) 20:10, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Fisheries Economics, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Randykitty (talk) 08:28, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]