To edit, please log in.

07:27, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
MalnadachBot (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Vandalism to Interstellar_medium from this IP address on 2006-12-15.

Vandalism to Interstellar_medium from this IP address on 2006-12-19.

It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from Clemson University. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. /blahedo (t) 18:04, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Thor (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 18:04, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Gamaliel 18:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during December 22 2006 (UTC)[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Falcorian ^(talk) 21:22, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not edit comment of another user...--Naohiro19(Talk Page/Contributions) 16:46, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Jones Springs, West Virginia (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 19:18, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Jones Springs, West Virginia. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. The Rambling Man 19:21, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Cleanroom. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses Nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --JFreeman ^(talk) 18:40, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Conveyor belt. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 17:36, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue spamming, as you did in Cleanroom, you will be blocked from editing. Húsönd 17:39, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2007[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Linear actuator, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from any site that uses the MediaWiki spam blacklist, which includes all of Wikimedia and Wikipedia. Nposs 17:44, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

This is most definitely a shared IP address, shared by a large number of users. Nposs, I'll see what I can do about the problem you've mentioned, but this is for all practical purposes a public IP, so exercise caution if you feel a block is warranted. "Soft blocking" would be effective. Dino 18:13, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --TeaDrinker 21:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to HD DVD. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Kbdank71 20:27, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Otherwise your comments may be mixed up with another person from the same IP address. If you don't want to do that for some reason, could you plase sign your comments with some sort of name so that there will be no confusion between you and other people from this IP address. Remember (talk) 18:35, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the above link as I have requested arbitration for a dispute that you are involved in. Feel free to contribute there. Regards, henrik•talk 11:44, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Waterboarding/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Waterboarding/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Anthøny 16:40, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This Arbitration case has closed, and the final decision may be reviewed through the above link. Further to the relevant findings of fact, Waterboarding and all closely-related pages are subject to article probation (full remedy); editors working on Waterboarding, or closely related pages, may be subject to an editing restriction at the discretion of any uninvolved administrator, whereby any edits by that editor which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, may result in a block. (full remedy).

Should any user subject to an editing restriction in this case violate that restriction, that user may be briefly blocked, up to a week in the event of repeated violations. After 5 blocks, the maximum block length shall increase to one year (full enforcement). Before such restrictions are enacted on an editor, he or she must be issued with a warning containing a link to the decision.

For the Arbitration Committee,
AGK (talk) 14:25, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In the recent arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Waterboarding-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area (such as uncivil comments and/or assumptions of bad faith from other editors like your comments here: [1]), you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. This constitutes your warning as required by the General restriction remedy. Thank you. Lawrence § t/e 16:20, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Diana, Princess of Wales has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Tresiden (talk) 19:32, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Boy George constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Epbr123 (talk) 19:36, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to tennis ball. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. WLU (talk) 16:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Ian Cairns (talk) 18:37, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Rock Band 2 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Shapiros10 ^{contact me}_{My work} 14:54, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to March 9[edit]

Dear 209.221.240.193,
Some of your edits on the page March 9 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. PseudoBot (talk) 00:31, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Haidinger fringe has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. DarkAudit (talk) 16:20, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Red Triangle (Pacific Ocean). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Piano non troppo (talk) 02:33, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to User:209.221.240.193, you will be blocked from editing. Please stop removing your sock puppet notice. Jock Boy 22:24, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

That is a very old notice. This is an IP address shared by thousands of people who work for a corporation. It is inappropriate to leave it here.

Please do not remove sockpuppet notice again. The age of the confirmed socking, or the nature of this ip are irrelevant. If you'd like your own user account, create one.Bali ultimate (talk) 21:12, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's from December 2006. This is December 2008. The person who attracted this sockpuppet notice may not even work here any longer, and there are thousands of others who do not deserve to be stigmatised in this manner. (unsigned, presumably from this ip).

Leave it alone. Get your own username and login (at the upper right hand corner of the screen) if you don't want to be "stigmatized." Remember, leave it alone.Bali ultimate (talk) 21:31, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you the God of Wikipedia? A member of the Arbitration Committee? An admin?

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Fruitcake. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Piano non troppo (talk) 14:23, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Indiana Daily Student worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Millahnna (mouse)talk 20:05, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Marion, Indiana. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Jusdafax 21:08, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Coupling. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Wizard191 (talk) 18:30, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

If you wish to highlight problems with the article Midget, please do so on the accompanying discussion page, Talk:Midget. Thanks. --Ibn (talk) 19:04, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page University of South Carolina has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Joe Gazz84 (user)•(talk)•(contribs) 18:53, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page University of South Carolina. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Coasterlover1994^{Leave your mark!} 18:55, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Sigma Lambda Beta, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 18:07, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to History of sugar has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. W4chris (talk) 15:39, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gaslighting, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Charles (talk) 20:56, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gaslighting, you may be blocked from editing. Charles (talk) 13:53, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

• Enough with the joke edits as you did to History of sugar and Zykos on July 15. Sharktopus ^talk 14:08, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Zykos, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SQGibbon (talk) 14:11, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 14:13, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Essential facilities doctrine has been reverted.
Your edit here to Essential facilities doctrine was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://supreme.justia.com/us/224/383/case.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:36, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Hello, I'm CherryX. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Rafz, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, CherryX (talk) 21:57, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Rafz. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. CherryX (talk) 22:09, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BigPimpinBrah. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Improvisation because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. BigPimpinBrah (talk) 17:41, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm CanadianLinuxUser. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to People (magazine), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 19:36, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at People (magazine) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Geoff ^{Who, me?} 18:05, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Derby Campineiro, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 20:16, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Derby Campineiro. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 20:27, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

In this edit and the previous one, you removed a valid source (doi:10.4271/920234) and the text A variation on the zirconia sensor, called the "wideband" sensor, was introduced by NTK in 1992, replacing it with the unsourced claim A variation on the zirconia sensor, called the "wideband" sensor, was introduced by Bosch. This is particularly inappropriate because this IP address is registered to Robert Bosch Corporation - North America. Wikipedia has very clear policies concerning conflict of interest and I'm going to request that this IP be blocked to prevent you causing further damage to the encyclopedia. --RexxS (talk) 00:37, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dammitkevin. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Whataboutism seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dammitkevin (talk) 16:57, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Sagecandor (talk) 17:18, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Kbseah. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gómez Palacio, Durango have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles are written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Kbseah (talk) 20:00, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello. Your recent edit to Marion, Indiana appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 20:16, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Marion, Indiana. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 23:03, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Zppix. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to IP Code— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 14:35, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Monotheism, you may be blocked from editing. Ifnord (talk) 17:19, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dan Spătaru have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 19:18, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, William Henry Lynn. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:55, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information such as how to apply to a program is not considered encyclopedic, it belongs on the university's web page, not Wikipedia. ... discospinster _talk 21:55, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Blue Edits. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Nut (fruit) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Blue Edits (talk) 14:53, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]