Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.
If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.
This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Candiru. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Xy7(talk) 20:20, 16 January 2008
Your recent edit to Geometry (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 18:53, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Battle of San Jacinto, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Battle of San Jacinto was changed by 207.80.142.5 (u)(t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-02-11T18:15:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:15, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mathew Rabey, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mathew Rabey was changed by 207.80.142.5 (u)(t) blanking the page on 2008-02-14T17:15:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:15, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, the recent edit you made to El Greco has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 16:04, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Salvador dali. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automaticallyreverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Salvador dali was changed by 207.80.142.5 (u)(t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-03-11T18:36:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:36, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply] Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to The Third of May 1808. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Tiddly-Tom 18:44, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to The Third of May 1808. Tiddly-Tom 18:45, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Paula Deen, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Collectonian (talk) 18:53, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of Naruto characters, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — sephiroth bcr(converse) 19:01, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to William Few has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. DavidWS (talk) 15:54, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not make comments directed at another editor's personal dignity as you did here. If you repeat that, I will have no choice but to restrain you from making further unhelpful edits. JehochmanTalk 16:25, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You continued trying to harass the user, and discourage their participation in wikipedia via personal attacks. I've given you a 24 hour vacation from editing. Please consider that we are a collaborative project, not a battle zone. JehochmanTalk 18:33, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I'd like to request unblock since I did not once make a personal attack. I made a comment of disapproval towards an editor's behavior, which in no way merits a block. Attempts to explain this to the blocking admin, User:Jehochman, were reverted and ignored, a classic case of WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT. I suspect Jehochman has a WP:COI here in that he just doesn't like hearing any comment addressed towards his favorite admin User:Yannismarou that isn't "OMG IM SRRY DNT LEVE YANIS." Jehoch also failed to WP:AGF and deemed me a troll and cited WP:DENY when reverting a perfectly constructive post on his talk page that can't possibly be construed as "trolling I ask that WP:NPA reviewed and I'd also like to point out again that not once was a personal attack made. I believed Yannis' actions to be disgusting and detrimental to Wikipedia, and I stated my opinion (as other unbanned editors were already doing) on his talk page in the relevant section.
Decline reason:
Agree with block. — Cirt (talk) 19:10, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Is this the only account you use to edit Wikipedia? You seem to know a lot about policy for a newcomer. JehochmanTalk 18:43, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is that intended to be mocking, or are you threatening to block whatever other account I may have? 207.80.142.5 (talk)
It is a serious question. Are you using an IP account so you can attack another user while keeping your main account "clean"? JehochmanTalk 18:47, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your actions Jehochman. I reverted this user as well on Yannis' page. The proposed edit is simply unacceptable. Dr.K. (talk) 18:50, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
When somebody is feeling low, it is unacceptable to kick them, repeatedly and after being warned. JehochmanTalk 18:58, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely. Thanks again. Dr.K. (talk) 05:12, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have reblocked this account, because it returned to the activities that got it blocking the first place. Additionally, this account is being used to evade a block that was placed on the user's main account. Talk to me before considering any unblocks. I am intentionally not connecting this IP to the main account in public.JehochmanTalk 14:35, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
The edit* which I was blocked for is an encouraging message. It is not uncivil, it is not harassment, it is being genuinely nice. Jehochman didn't seem to consider this, and just decided to block me for even editing a talk page, probably assuming my edit was bad. If one argument can be made for the comment's apparent inappropriateness, I'll back off, but so far all I've gotten are template warnings and a "I agree with the block," which doesn't help me at all. By the way, the only reason I'm using this account is because A) the block on it ran out and B) I didn't want to leave on a negative note, and felt like I should have put a nicer thing on the talk page. I did so, and now I'm being crucified for being a nice guy. Sorry. Oh, and I can't talk to Jehochman before considering an unblock because he was so quick to block me, meaning I can't edit his talk page.
Decline reason:
Considering the tone of the message that got this IP blocked in the first place, the latest message comes off sounding entirely insincere and rather smarmy. That, in conjunction with the block evasion, calls for the IP to remain blocked. —Travistalk 19:44, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
(* that edit is here) (talk) 18:03, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I shouldn't be blocked because some editors thought that a genuine, honest post was sarcastic. It's a lose-lose situation for me: if I'm sarcastic, I'm banned. If I'm honest, I'm seen as sarcastic and banned.
Decline reason:
Your requests for unblock have already been made, twice, and declined. Responsible administrators have reviewed the case, and upheld the decision. Please do not continue to make unblock requests; they will be denied. — Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 21:50, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Block evasion is not allowed, whether you are sarcastic or sincere. JehochmanTalk 20:13, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Nothing has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. —SMALLJIM 15:09, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Informant has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 16:06, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Laws of Burgos has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ≈ Chamaltalk ¤ 13:42, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Peter Keinz, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A8UDI 15:53, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Yates High School has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Orphan Wiki 16:47, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Jefferson Memorial has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tommy2010 15:53, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mount Vernon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automaticallyreverted.
If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mount Vernon was changed by 207.80.142.5 (u)(t) deleting 25343 characters on 2010-04-30T14:03:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:04, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for vandalism, for a period of two weeks.
If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.
{{unblock|violation This IP address is registered to an educational institution with over 600 students. The vast majority of the vandalism and unconstructive edits have been made by members of the schools middle school classes. We have talked to the students in their computer literacy courses regarding why vandalism of sources like wikipedia is inappropriate and unacceptable. While we know that standard procedure in these situations is simply for those with constructive input to register their own accounts, we feel that is not practical in this school environment, and unnecessary given the school's policies, and the maturity of the vast majority of the students. }
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Carson Cole has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Addihockey10 15:53, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Brian Cushing has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ(talk) 21:26, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Kinkaid School, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Shriram (talk) 17:56, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at S.C.I.E.N.C.E.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Shriram (talk) 17:58, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to S.C.I.E.N.C.E.. --Lucas Nunes (talk) 18:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.
If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.
Favonian (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]Comments: Blocked for 3 months.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
The long history of abuse from this IP address does not warrant an unblock at this time. Please consider requesting an account, as logged in users are exempt from this IP block. --Chris(talk) 15:32, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello, I'm Thine Antique Pen. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Dijon, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Thine Antique Pen (talk) 16:42, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dijon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. IrishStephen (talk) 16:24, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to How to Kill. DVdm (talk) 16:39, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinut/c 17:49, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hello, I'm Oda Mari. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Chibi (term), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 15:48, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Lethosor. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to File:Conways_game_of_life_breeder_animation.gif because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Lethosor (talk) 15:43, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Smash Hits (song) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. --Lucas Nunes (talk) 18:00, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Thine Antique Pen. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Dijon, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Thine Antique Pen (talk) 16:42, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
