Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Spitfire (LeAnn Rimes album) that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:17, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Seriously. The "reference" you keep adding is not a reference. Then you add personnel that is not supported. That is why the material is being removed. I'm sorry that you think I'm showing page ownership. I don't feel I own that article. It was the subject of vandalism several months ago and so I added it to my watch list. I am now simply watching it so that material isn't added incorrectly. I'm sorry you feel that I'm vandalizing the article, but perhaps you can explain why "The truth in no particular order. [sic]" is correctly punctuated and how >Spitfire (Media notes). Rhino Records UK, Curb Records. 2013. The truth in no particular order {{cite AV media notes}}: |format= requires |url= (help); Check date values in: |year= (help); Unknown parameter |artist= ignored (|others= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |publisherid= ignored (help)</ref><ref>Spitfire (Media notes). Curb Records. 2013. The truth in no particular order {{cite AV media notes}}: |format= requires |url= (help); Check date values in: |year= (help); Unknown parameter |artist= ignored (|others= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |publisherid= ignored (help) is an actual reference. It breaks several formatting guidelines (linking the year and format. I accept liner notes as being valid, but to apply a name like that is not encyclopedic. However, if you were to explain what that meant, with a valid source, that might be better. Also, if you add material to an article and it's removed, it's usually appropriate to discuss it. I have chosen to discuss it here, but discussing it on the article's talk page would also be appropriate. Timrollpickering 18:46, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am so sorry and yes i am new to this... so please forgive corrections or edits...since i work for the man who co-created the project there are misinterpretations out there from unqualified persons. As in, there were never four singles from that record, there were videos created in order to let people hear the record.. So it is frustrating for him and the artist knowing that the wiki has uneducated assumptions to what was a single or what wasn't a single. mainly because the artist released 4 separate portions of a live video to show people the record ."Borrowed" and "Gasoline and Matches" were the only songs that were singles released to radio.

The other frustrating part is that the project had over 100 "best record she ever made" critic reviews from the hollywood reporter to usatoday - and they are being represented... only the very few dark and negative view... so if there is help that can be giving to allow the truth to shown on the single releases...and the balance of critical reviews it would be awesome. I do not want to get in the way here on wiki and i do appreciate the instruction. Just need Help Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sophiasdad (talk • contribs) 03:30, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]