To edit, please log in.

21:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
174.69.5.198 (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Buzz Lightyear of Star Command—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:37, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Lego Movie, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:31, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Pixar films, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Notfrompedro (talk) 23:54, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Monsters, Inc.. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 22:31, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Wild Chase. Binksternet (talk) 04:20, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasioni by Special:Contributions/173.19.61.247. Binksternet (talk) 04:31, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. BrickMaster02 (talk) 02:06, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I promise I won't edit that again. 174.69.5.198 (talk) 02:10, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 22:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me! 174.69.5.198 (talk) 18:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Magitroopa (talk) 23:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you do that to that page? Those other titles were good! WHY JUST WHY!?! 174.69.5.198 (talk) 22:55, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 years for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 22:37, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to be blocked for two whole years! Please unblock me! I don't mean any harm! 😭 174.69.5.198 (talk) 22:01, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You unblock me this instance I don't want to be blocked for TWO WHOLE YEARS!!! 🤬 I'm always angry when I get blocked! 174.69.5.198 (talk) 22:06, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you see me getting more and more angry at all?! That's because I want you to reply a message to me about a promise to me because I don't mean any harm! 174.69.5.198 (talk) 22:16, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These edits I didn't know better about and they were by accident! 174.69.5.198 (talk) 22:37, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For the one thousand time reply something to me and unblock me from this in general!!! I'LL JUST VISIT THIS AND EDIT ONLY IF I REALLY HAVE TO!!! 174.69.5.198 (talk) 18:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Case please unblock me! Reply something to me now! 174.69.5.198 (talk) 20:48, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Case, I'm so sorry about my disruptive editing I've been doing over the years, and I mean not last time, but the other last times I've been blocked. What I was basically trying to do was seeing if I can make some pages either make more sense, or better, but over the last two months (since my most recent block), I've realized they all don't have to be made like that. I've also realized that there is not very much of a reason to edit here unless there is something in particular I want to edit. I also am sorry about my other messages I've sent you that you probably found harsh to reply. Now, I have been remembering to answer my messages when I receive one. I also have been seeing that some of the pages that I've editing and told not for wrong reasons that they don't need those edits after all. One most important thing I want to try to do now if I (supposedly) get unblocked, is always talk about important pages to edit first before editing them. Leave me a message on what you think about this reply. 174.69.5.198 (talk) 23:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Case, I believe the editor wants your attention. Drmies (talk) 23:26, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tell him that I also feel bad and rejected for what I've done the past bad times I've been editing. 174.69.5.198 (talk) 00:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies, according to my message above, the one I told to Daniel Case, would you be able to unblock me or him? 174.69.5.198 (talk) 00:40, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will be able to give this better consideration in a couple of days, when I'm back from seeing the eclipse. Daniel Case (talk) 16:55, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. 174.69.5.198 (talk) 18:41, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Case, have you made your consideration yet? 174.69.5.198 (talk) 20:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't been able to sit down and look over the record yet due to some other things that have imposed on my time. I am hoping to in the next day or so. Daniel Case (talk) 01:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My weekend is turning out to be more hectic both on-wiki and off- than I thought it would be. Hopefully tomorrow night. Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you gonna unblock me? 174.69.5.198 (talk) 22:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Case, have you made up your mind of when you are gonna unblock me? 174.69.5.198 (talk) 00:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I just got Internet access back after longer time off than I wanted. I do mean to do this, but I'd like also to get the other admins who've blocked you for long periods of time in the past to weigh in. Daniel Case (talk) 02:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

174.69.5.198 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello Daniel Case, it's been 9 days since you've told me you were gonna unblock me the next day or so, have you made your mind yet? 174.69.5.198 (talk) 13:46, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No one said they would unblock you, but that they would look at it. Pestering Daniel to look at it will not speed up the process. You will need to tell us what specifically was disruptive about your editing, so that we know you understand and will not repeat it in the future; also describe what edits you intend to make. 331dot (talk) 07:16, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

174.69.5.198 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My disruptive edits were either calling titles for movie of what they can also called for a film series, some of them were from directly my head and from IMDb.com when you search the movie on the site. I'm sorry for all of this. 174.69.5.198 (talk) 21:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You failed to follow 331dot's instructions. Yamla (talk) 20:20, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

174.69.5.198 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I just wanted to tell you that the last few days ago, I was in a different area on wikipedia that was open for me to edit. Now, about what you've been trying to say to me about not doing my disruptive editing in the past but wouldn't listen? Well, during the times I've not been here, and that other area, when I was editing, I realized my mistakes right away when they changed my edits I did back to the way it was before, and decided to make my edits a right way for the website instead of continuing my wrong kind of editing so I wouldn't get blocked. That is the reason why I've changed my idea into a better one when I want to edit here in this area without getting blocked 174.69.5.198 (talk) 00:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I just wanted to tell you that the last few days ago, I was in a different area on wikipedia that was open for me to edit. Now, about what you've been trying to say to me about not doing my disruptive editing in the past but wouldn't listen? Well, during the times I've not been here, and that other area, when I was editing, I realized my mistakes right away when they changed my edits I did back to the way it was before, and decided to make my edits a right way for the website instead of continuing my wrong kind of editing so I wouldn't get blocked. That is the reason why I've changed my idea into a better one when I want to edit here in this area without getting blocked [[Special:Contributions/174.69.5.198|174.69.5.198]] ([[User talk:174.69.5.198#top|talk]]) 00:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I just wanted to tell you that the last few days ago, I was in a different area on wikipedia that was open for me to edit. Now, about what you've been trying to say to me about not doing my disruptive editing in the past but wouldn't listen? Well, during the times I've not been here, and that other area, when I was editing, I realized my mistakes right away when they changed my edits I did back to the way it was before, and decided to make my edits a right way for the website instead of continuing my wrong kind of editing so I wouldn't get blocked. That is the reason why I've changed my idea into a better one when I want to edit here in this area without getting blocked [[Special:Contributions/174.69.5.198|174.69.5.198]] ([[User talk:174.69.5.198#top|talk]]) 00:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I just wanted to tell you that the last few days ago, I was in a different area on wikipedia that was open for me to edit. Now, about what you've been trying to say to me about not doing my disruptive editing in the past but wouldn't listen? Well, during the times I've not been here, and that other area, when I was editing, I realized my mistakes right away when they changed my edits I did back to the way it was before, and decided to make my edits a right way for the website instead of continuing my wrong kind of editing so I wouldn't get blocked. That is the reason why I've changed my idea into a better one when I want to edit here in this area without getting blocked [[Special:Contributions/174.69.5.198|174.69.5.198]] ([[User talk:174.69.5.198#top|talk]]) 00:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

174.69.5.198 (talk) 00:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, just to be clear, you are admitting you evaded your block and edited Wikipedia using a different IP address? --Yamla (talk) 11:45, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I've notice my mistakes real quickly and instead of just doing them constantly, I try to think what I need to do the next time I do edit, whenever someone leaves me a message and not do the same edit that they think is disruptive so I won't get blocked. 174.69.5.198 (talk) 21:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]