Hello, Unknown Lupus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page ‎Corequenque have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

There is a page about the verifiability policy that explains the policy in greater detail, and another that offers tips on the proper ways of citing sources. If you are stuck and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Calaka (talk) 09:40, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:37, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lupus, Ebelred is accusing you of being my sock puppet in Wikipedia:Requests for comment/MarshalN20. I encourage you to defend yourself, otherwise they might end up blocking your account for something that is not true. Well, that and they might also block my account. So, we shouldn't put up with this kind of bullying.--$%MarshalN20%$ (talk) 21:30, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Si, me parece muy grande la coincidencia, pero yo ya no entiendo que es lo que esta pasando con este articulo de Diablada. Yo creo que el tiene una variedad de Sock Puppets, y por eso es que a el le gusta acusar a otros de eso ("mas sabe el diablo por viejo que por diablo"). Pero, el muy vivo intenta romper su conexion con los otros editores de "IP" creando un account falso, como es el caso de "RBCM" (Que, si notas, su unica contribucion ha sido en contra de mi en la pagina que creo Erebel en mi contra). Mas que nada, este "IP" que nos ataco (Porque veo que tambien ataco tu pagina, y creo que tambien ataco la de User:Dentren y User:Arafael) demuestra tener una mentalidad muy, como podia explicar, "nacionalista" e ignorante.

Ademas, este muchacho Ethelred o Erebel, o como sea que se llame, le encanta decir que el paso tres meses estudiando sobre el tema y trabajando con otros en la Wikipedia del Castellano. Sin embargo, cada vez que chequeo esa Wikipedia, lo unico que veo es que el User:Arafael es el contribuidor mas activo y, por lo tanto, productivo en ese articulo. Apenas veo a "Erebel" en ese articulo, y mucho menos veo que el haya estado "estudiando por tres meses" la materia. En realidad, ese cuento me parece mas estupido que el de caperucita roja, y no le creo para nada.

Tienes mucha razon en mencionar que a el le encanta chillar como gallina cuando alguien dice algo sobre Bolivia; pero cuando un usuario insulta a Peru y a Chile, y tambien insulta directamente a otros usuarios, el lo considera como algo menor y sin mucha importancia. None of us have insulted him personally. Ninguno de nosotros lo ha insultado porque es boliviano, y tampoco lo hemos insultado por su persona (mas bien, hemos mostrado nuestro desacuerdo con sus ediciones, no por el). Quisas mi comentario de "YOU blah blah," fue lo unico que se podria considerar directamente en contra de el. Pero, claro, mientras que a nosotros nos atacan nuestras paginas de Wikipedia, el muy chistoso de "Erebel" le escribe al "IP": "Thank you I really appreciate your support." Te imaginas si hubiera sido al reves? Este hijo de Oruro me hubiera acusado, otra vez, de que yo estaba usando "sock puppets."

Lo mas gracioso de todo es que el considera que nosotros, en especial yo (porque el tambien cree que tu eres yo; y que yo soy medio mundo), lo estamos preveniendo a el de editar el articulo. Pero el no entiende que Wikipedia no es un diccionario, y de que lo que comento la UNESCO solamente se refiere al Carnaval de Oruro (no a la Diablada). El se pone muy terco, y en su mente no quiere entender esto. A mi parecer, el se ha pasado tres meses leyendo la misma tonteria de la UNESCO de la RAE, y por eso ahora se le hace dificil sacarselo de su cabeza. En todo caso, aqui tengo un sandbox User:MarshalN20/Sandbox donde estoy incluyendo nuevas cosas para el articulo sin que el usuario "Erebel" este molestando o incluyendo frases nacionalistas. Gracias y ten un buen dia.--MarshalN20 | ^Talk 01:31, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ekeko-moderno.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Ricky81682 (talk) 10:10, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How have you been Lupus? Are you working on any new projects?--MarshalN20 | ^Talk 17:38, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've been doing alright. I've been quite busy as well, particularly with my studies (I signed up for some literature class, and there's quite a lot of reading; not surprisingly). Then there's also this Calculus class that's giving me nightmares...but that's too much agony for this message. Yes, I understand your perspective on the "great reverting" capabilities of Wikipedia. There's not much that can be done about it, particularly if there are people who know how to work the system in order to push their POVs. However, since Wikipedia is such a greatly referenced place, there is no other option but to present all information available in the subject (despite some people feel insulted by it). Recently, I've been updating the War of the Pacific article (I'm trying to improve it now that the "battle" that overcame the article has died away for the moment). I was going to talk to the mediator in the Diablada case in regards to the matter, but found that Erebedel had done that already (and had began to talk bad about me; refering to my actions as "Patrolling articles" and provided the idea that I was doing bad edits). Keep your eyes open Lupus, watch your edits, the walls have eyes (essentially, there have been recent attempts to ban you from Wikipedia; so take care not to fall for people's tricks).--MarshalN20 | ^Talk 21:15, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unknown Lupus, you are hereby cordially invited to express your opinions and concerns in regards to User:Erebedhel in the following RFC article: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Erebedhel. This is not meant to influence your opinion in any particular way whatsoever. You are free to agree with my statement by adding your name in the "Users certifying the basis for this dispute", just as you are free to not agree and not sign anything. Moreover, you can also provide an outside view and provide more information in regards to your situation with Erebedhel. However, be reminded that this RFC will not continue unless it gets two signatures that certify the situation as a problem. Best regards.--MarshalN20 | ^Talk 01:00, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]