Hi Ruben192! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:02, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Ljubiša Mikić, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:36, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Justlettersandnumbers. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ljubiša Mikić, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 06:37, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ljubiša Mikić, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. DrStrauss talk 15:18, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ljubiša Mikić, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:38, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ljubiša Mikić. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:15, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Content you add to Wikipedia must be WP:verifiable by reference to reliable sources. Unreferenced content is liable to be removed without discussion or delay. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:18, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ljubiša Mikić. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:30, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please confirm, here on this page, that you understand what this message means. If you don't understand, please ask! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:32, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ljubiša Mikić. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:30, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please confirm, here on this page, that you understand what this message means. If you don't understand, please ask! Staszek Lem (talk) 00:33, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Ruben192, thanks for creating Dušan Đorđević (politician)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your references; all articles need references, especially when you're accusing someone of being a Nazi collaborator.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 16:30, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Ludwig von Schröder (Luftwaffe), Ruben192!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add sources.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 16:31, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Ruben192, thanks for creating Vojislav Marinković!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 16:32, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Ruben192, thanks for creating Miloš Trifunović (politician)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 16:32, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Steven Ivanić, Ruben192!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I'm moving this to Draft:Steven Ivanić. It is on a controversial topic and on a person who lived not long ago, and is completely unverified. Please work on it then transfer it back to the mainspace only when it is ready.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 16:34, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Same for Draft:Radosav Veselinović and Draft:Đorđe Perić. Boleyn (talk) 09:07, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is user:Ruben192 keeps creating 100% unreferenced articles. Alex Shih^Talk 01:24, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alex Shih^Talk 01:22, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is hopefully to get your attention, so that you can start communicating with other editors that have questioned your persistent addition of unsourced content. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, so if you choose to ignore other editors, you may not be here to build an encyclopedia. Regards, Alex Shih^Talk 01:22, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Miloš Trifunović (politician), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:19, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ruben192: While your contributions are much appreciated, please do not create anymore unsourced content directly to mainspace. Try using draft, user space, or Articles for Creation process instead. Also, you need to respond to other editors when there are questions about your editing, this is not optional. Thanks! Alex Shih^Talk 01:11, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ruben192, despite all the warnings on this page, and your recent block, you continue to create articles with no references whatsoever. Please don't do that any more, it is not helpful to the project. Do you understand English (please answer, here, either "yes" or "no")? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:10, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Staszek Lem (talk) 00:38, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved Draft:Dušan Đorđević (politician) to draftspace because it is another unreferenced article calling someone a Nazi collaborator, a very emotive term and topic. Other editors have asked you to WP:ENGAGE - that isn't their personal opinion, it is a requirement. Can you respond to this message to confirm understanding? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 12:57, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Staszek Lem, Ruben192 is still refusing to respond to messages lie those above, about an unreferenced article (Dušan Letica) created after your final warning. 10 days later, Ruben192 added unreliable sources. Ljubiša M. Bojić was also created after your warning. Boleyn (talk) 19:43, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Ruben192, thanks for creating Ljubiša M. Bojić!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. PLease add more sources and sources should, preferably, be WP:INLINECITED. Without this, they can't reach Good or Featured Article status.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 12:58, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Dušan Letica, Ruben192!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please WP:INLINECITE your sources. It is impossible for a reader to easily identify where you got your information from.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 14:29, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide valid references for the article Dušan Letica. The books you listed at the bottom do not provide all kind of detail written in your article. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:05, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Ljubiša M. Bojić, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:55, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Marko Ristić (Yugoslav Partisan) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Hummerrocket (talk) 01:57, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ruben192. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Steven Ivanić".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 17:24, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Đorđe Perić. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 17:06, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ruben192. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dušan Pantić".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 20:05, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ruben192. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ludwig von Schröder".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 20:12, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ruben192. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dušan Đorđević".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 21:08, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Miloš Trifunović (politician), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is a draft which has not been edited in over six months. (See section G13 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 08:39, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ruben192. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vojislav Marinković".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 12:24, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ljubiša M. Bojić, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ruben192. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Radosav Veselinović".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 19:05, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ruben192. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Operation Letica is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Letica until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 01:06, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at United Airlines Flight 93, you may be blocked from editing. David J Johnson (talk) 16:15, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Acroterion (talk) 20:17, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 20:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages now require direct reliable sources for additions. For details see the content guideline, the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page. Almost all new additions without references are now being reverted on-sight.

Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages.

Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 16:04, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Mohamed Atta. Toddst1 (talk) 16:06, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've brought your pattern of adding unsourced material to areas subject to sanction to WP:ANI. You may wish to comment on the discussion. Toddst1 (talk) 14:58, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for unsourced edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:28, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Dušan Letica requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Toddst1 (talk) 14:43, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]