Archives

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

NiRan Jr23 (talk) 18:58, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here NiRan Jr23 (talk) 20:28, 14 April 2021 (UTC)}[reply]

Hi NiRan Jr23! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm SunDawn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Republic of West Papua—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. SunDawn (talk) 09:06, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Republic of West Papua. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SunDawn (talk) 09:08, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Republic of West Papua, you may be blocked from editing. SunDawn (talk) 09:08, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Republic of West Papua. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. funplussmart (talk) 19:54, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you are, then be aware that you may be in violation of the Wikipedia rules against undeclared multiple accounts. If not, then you are improperly asserting to be and have done everything he declares on his own Wikipedia user page. Please explain, if you are able.--Quisqualis (talk) 03:49, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, with a very recently created account, how do you have barnstars dating back up to 14 years?--Quisqualis (talk) 04:09, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Quisqualis Thanks for the ping. This account is not operated by me.

I am going to blank the user page that has been copied from mine. I believe it constitutes disruptive editing, intentional or not. William Avery (talk) 06:58, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Republic of West Papua. Jamesluiz102 (talk) 16:52, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ixfd64 (talk) 20:26, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here NiRan Jr23 (talk) 20:27, 14 April 2021 (UTC)} i'm Sorry[reply]