FYI - ClueBot and other Bots are automated programs. There is no person involved. Warnings, on the other hand, are created by a person, usually an Administrator, who has been alerted to a pattern of Bot actions. Another action that attracts Admins is to get into an 'edit war.' This is where you add something, someone else takes it out, you add it back.... Can lead to one or both parties being temporarily banned until tempers cool. Think of it as a 'time out.' Disputes are supposed to be taken to the Talk pages of the article in question rather than the Talk page of the other editor. Lastly, just because you know something is true, you cannot add it. (I've been down that road more than once.) You have to have an acceptable reference. David notMD (talk) 12:31, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Papers, Please has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Papers, Please was changed by Morintango (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912521 on 2018-02-01T16:57:21+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:57, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to harm Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. . Please get back to making sensible edits to show that you care. Dbfirs 17:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Look at a score or so of User pages and you will get an idea. Includes credentials such as milestones for how many edits, or how many articles the User has elevated to Good Article status. Topics of interest to the User. People with specialty degrees (MD, PhD...) may add those if they contribute in their area of expertise. Some people have been around for a LOOOOOONNNNGGGGGGG time, yet post very little. David notMD (talk) 21:56, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Salty suite 2015, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Largoplazo (talk) 15:38, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or write things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia, as you did at Salty suite 2015. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. We're sorry if this message has discouraged you from editing here, but the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:33, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Mods Can't Ban Me, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PabloMartinez (talk) 14:52, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PabloMartinez (talk) 14:53, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know I'm wrong so I can attempt to do better Morintango (talk) 14:54, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Morintango, the problem with those edits is you're not citing reliable sources; see WP:RS. PabloMartinez, reporting this as a vandalism-only account and slapping warning templates may not help much, and this is not, to my eyes, a vandalism-only account. Drmies (talk) 14:58, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• But this kind of stuff is childish and will get you blocked. Don't make such edits again please. Drmies (talk) 14:59, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]