Just wanted to say well done on your edits to this article. It's a great serial and deserves a much better page. Some day I mean to get around to really improving the Dennis Potter content on Wikipedia. His article ought to be featured, and hopefully will be good enough to be some day. Keep up the good work, anyway! Angmering 20:02, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why my Wikipedia editing access has been blocked ~ & I'm alarmed that any "abuse" of the system could be ascribed to me. My Wiki UN is: Kilrea. My UID is: 8553291

~Those co-ordinates should show that I've not edited much since last year (May, 07) ~ & most recently in April this year ~ both on just one site: That for Cheryl Campbell, a British actor.

My ISP is the University of California,Los Angeles, though my DSL connection is through the commercial vendor: Verizon.

I guess I'm just upset that a block would be imposed for reasons quite beyond my comprehension.

Kilrea (talk) 05:35, 17 June 2008 (UTC) Kilrea[reply]

Hi, Kilrea. Your entire Internet service provider has been temporarily blocked due to persistent abuse by a single very disruptive user who's been abusing Verizon's SoCal DSL networks. Since you're an established editor, I've granted your account an exemption from IP blocking; this will allow you to edit through full blocks without affecting you when you're logged in. Please read Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

I hope that you'll put this inconvenience behind you and continue to contribute to Wikipedia. :) east.718 at 07:04, June 17, 2008

We're doing some early "spring cleaning" and it seems that you've been inactive in the last three months. Typically, IP rangeblocks do not last quite this long, so I've taken the liberty of removing the extraneous permission from your account. You should be fine, though if you experience problems due to IP blocks again, please re-request the permission.

If you're no longer editing for some reason, please feel welcome to do so again in the future! Kylu (talk) 04:59, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Broadcasting Press Guild, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.broadcastingpressguild.org/about/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Broadcasting Press Guild and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Broadcasting Press Guild, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Broadcasting Press Guild with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Broadcasting Press Guild. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Broadcasting Press Guild saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! TimofKingsland (talk) 23:35, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I did not post, & have nothing to do with, the Broadcasting Press Guild page called out here. Kilrea (talk) 23:56, 17 July 2012 (UTC)Kilrea (17 July 2012)[reply]

Even though the copyrighted material was available on Wikipedia up until I posted the message on your talk page, it was added to Wikipedia more than 6 years ago, so you may not remember doing it. Here is a link to the edit that created this article (note the user name in the pink box). As the article was created with this edit (there are no previous revisions), the material was added by Kilrea. Were you in control of this account in February 2006, or did you inherit it from someone else since? TimofKingsland (talk) 02:35, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link; useful, since I've never seen the entry. Note the use of "we" in the original posting, indicating it was written by a member of the Broadcasting Press Guild. I am not, nor have I ever been, such a member. That my user name is also Kilrea & that I became active on Wiki at the end of January, 2006, is a coincidence ~ one that could perhaps be explained if there is (or was) no barrier to duplication of user names. At any rate, I can only repeat: I did not post, & have nothing to do with, the Broadcasting Press Guild page. Meanwhile, deletion of copyrighted material is a very clearly articulated term of use; & one with which I wholeheartedly concur. So, with the understanding that the tree up which you are barking was NOT planted by me, let's let this thing rest.