Hello! HindWIKI, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:01, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar and for adding good quality content to Wikipedia Atlantic306 (talk) 16:23, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I didn't receive your email. If you are using Yahoo mail it doesn't work with Wikipedia, thanks Ji u Atlantic306 (talk) 16:52, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

@Atlantic306:, No problem sir I just only want to you say thanks for reviewing new articles. Great and happy day! (HindWiki (Love My India) • Talk to Hindustani ! 00:33, 18 October 2017 (UTC))

• • • thanks for the good work Atlantic306 (talk) 16:04, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello, sir. ,One person can request me about it. So i want your help because iam not able to creating an article about an indian Film, Television actress , Name: Shumana Gupta also you searching सूमन गुप्ता Work:

            Baal Krishna as Yashoda
            Baal Veer as Jal pari 
           Aahat as Radhika
          No One Killed Jessica as Soma 

If you want more information about her please searching her name in google., please you can creating this article it's request Thank You sir, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ladchad (talk • contribs) 11:38, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

• Hello sir if you not creating as Shumana Gupta than creating as Suman (actress) because i can see a atutomated filter in Draft:Shumana Gupta and also you not find surces about Suman than please searching on google Baal Krishna show cast name Thank you . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ladchad (talk • contribs) 13:33, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

@Boleyn:, Can you explain, what is the problem in this page? If this is against Wikipedia policies then I am support you to delete it. Thanks (HindWiki (Love My India) • Talk to Hindustani ! 13:57, 20 October 2017 (UTC))

Sorry for inputing my own ideas here. About the page in question, see WP:HATNOTE. Use that when it's just two items for the same word; in this case Half Marrige only has two pages. Also see WP:Hatnotes are cheap for some info as to why using hatnotes instead of disambiguation pages for just two topics is better. Good luck, and happy editing! _{Adotchar| reply here} 00:06, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

@Adotchar: Thank you very much for help and I was already support it for deletion at deletion's entry. Thanks again for this and your all work on Wikipedia. (HindWiki (Love My India) • Talk to Hindustani ! 00:13, 24 October 2017 (UTC))

Most of the Snapchat Story drama isn't online, and I can't link the story to anything. How can I cite this? The main purpose of my trivia section was for info that people wouldn't know unless they went there. I go there, and that's why I care. I understand the need to cite my sources, but am not sure how. Morintango (talk) 03:03, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Okay, But Prove it to adding some of references. If you don't, your inputs are revert again. Thanks HINDWIKI • CHAT 12:01, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

It happened in real life, not on Internet (except Snapchat I guess). Also, it's a trivia tab. I can change it to show things that can be proved I guess. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Morintango (talk • contribs) 14:18, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

@Morintango: Please read this for more. HINDWIKI • CHAT 14:25, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Just curious, but why did you revert my edits for the Joomyeong Kim article? I tried to source all of the statements. Any problems in particular with what I wrote? 2600:8807:101:FF00:21EE:213E:770E:8ECE (talk) 01:58, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Because you made there mass changes without any reliable sourced and I reverted it because they seemed good faiths. Thanks HINDWIKI • CHAT 02:04, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Quite the contrary; I added about 20 sources (mostly peer-reviewed journal articles) for all my statements and removed unsourced material about personal life. 2600:8807:101:FF00:21EE:213E:770E:8ECE (talk) 02:14, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Okay, but please consider to creating a account for editing simply and with more fun. HINDWIKI • CHAT 02:18, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

	Helped remind me of the importance of citation.
	He told me to cite it and I did. Wrong. So I fixed it. Morintango (talk) 15:07, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar. Regards HINDWIKI • CHAT 15:51, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you, means a lot for me. King Prithviraj II (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

your welcome. HINDWIKI • CHAT 13:38, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

I have not added any defamatory content on the Padmavati (film) page. At first, I was not aware of the fact that news articles cannot be quoted word for word which user Diannaa made me aware of. I stopped doing that and have not added any copyrighted or defamatory content since then. Please, do not make false accusations and see my edits on the page since then - Almeda64, 06:00, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

@Almeda64:, Your edits rows on Padmavati (film) didn't seemed improvement. And you made edits on edits in the page that's I seemed defamatory content. HINDWIKI • CHAT 08:37, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

"That seemed defamatory content" this means that you have not actually checked them? Please check them first and then decide whether they are defamatory or not. You are just saying that you assumed they were defamatory, is this how things work on Wikipedia? Assumptions? And my edits were improvement if you had actually checked them you would know that - Almeda64, 8:51, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

I've noticed that you're just editing the Padmavati (film) and its related one-two pages. I had cyclomaniacs to check your edits already. Too many edits have been hidden in your editing history. I know about all the policies of Wikipedia. You are welcome to edit whole Wikipedia and please take a look on related policies. Thank you. HINDWIKI • CHAT 09:08, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, Which of the two sources there is unreliable in your opinion? Thank you. Rahul Bott (talk) 14:10, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Per WP:JUDGES, the article need more references. fails WP:BLP. for more Wikipedia:Notability (law). HINDWIKI • CHAT 14:16, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, I am confused after reading your reply. You disputed the reliability of the sources given but now you are contesting notability itself. Never mind that WP:JUDGES or WP:NLAW is not an accepted proposal, the section that you referred to clearly says "Judges ... are nevertheless considered notable if they are non-temporary members of a high court as described below." Ramesh is one. Did you mean to use Template:refimprove instead of Template:unreliable sources? Can you also please elaborate which specific point(s) mentioned in WP:BLP are failing here? As the notability guidelines specific to law do not seem to be established, I also request User:Kudpung for comments on this. Rahul Bott (talk) 02:18, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Sorry its my mistake. I want used to Reimprove template but I was used this. HINDWIKI • CHAT 02:45, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi my friend , How do I archive my discussion page?

Thanks--IamIRAQI (talk) 17:21, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

@IamIRAQI: Add this to your talk page at the top:

{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(14d)
| archive = User talk:IamIRAQI/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 1
| maxarchivesize = 50K
| archiveheader = {{Aan}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft = 2
}} You can change "algo" to however long you want. Anarchyte (work | talk) 00:14, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi HindWIKI. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Anarchyte (work | talk) 00:11, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Dear HindWIKI, I have examined your editing and contributions and was recently the recipient of an AfC decision from you. Based on all these I think your activities at the Teahouse, at deletion debates and at Articles-for-creation are perhaps a bit premature and may actually be counterproductive to the cause of Wikipedia. May I suggest that you initially focus on article construction (beyond just the themes - have seen the 23 articles you have created - that you work on if possible) which is perhaps the first step in understanding issues here. Cheers. Shyamal (talk) 10:52, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello there, @Shyamal: Thank you so much for your suggestion. I am active on Hindi Wikipedia very long and I have started contributing on English Wikipedia too. I am well acquainted with the policies of Wikipedia. I'll create and improve articles right now but just am concentrating on the quality of Wikipedia. Because of me, there will be no harm to Wikipedia. Again Thanks!! HINDWIKI • CHAT 13:28, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Shyamal, I find HindWIKI's decline to be appropriate, and your move out of draft space to be inappropriate. Your references are almost entirely his own research, which as PRIMARY sources are both discouraged and do nothing to demonstrate notability. I see no indication that WP:PROF has been met, and WP:GNG certainly hasn't either. I have moved the page back to Draft:K. S. R. Krishna Raju. Please continue to work on the draft and resubmit when you feel it is ready. Primefac (talk) (talk page stalker)

@Primefac: - I believe that most importantly WP:AFC is not a compulsory pathway to article creation. The original creator of the article has used one obituary which as a reference and the text of at least one other article indicates the reasons for naming a new subspecies after the subject. In my view notability is indicated by taxa named in honour in this case - PROF is not applicable here as the subject is not a university academic. I would suggest that the draft be published and that you take the article to WP:AFD following the usual process. Apart from AFC being optional, I did not think User:HindWIKI was making an appropriate judgement here because most of their own creations were actually classic examples of unreliable sources and of marginal notability - (examples Bepannaah, Laado_2_(TV_series), Saam_Daam_Dand_Bhed_(TV_series), Half_Marriage, Samay_Shah, Tanvi_Dogra). In any case I think imposing the AFC process on editors is inappropriate behaviour. It is just a choice available to editors. Shyamal (talk) 02:07, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Two things. First, if I accept a draft and then immediately send it to AFD, it implies that it's not ready for the article space and thus should not have been accepted in the first place. I see you've started a discussion on the draft talk itself, which going forward is probably a better location to discuss this issue.

Second, per the section immediately below this one, I will agree with you that HindWIKI is not yet ready for AFC reviewing. This is unfortunate, but hopefully they can return to the project after getting a bit more experience. Primefac (talk) 17:31, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

@Shyamal:, all that you are maximovitching of my articles here are well sourced with Indian notable news website's references. It's disappointing to me to tell my good work poorly. HINDWIKI • CHAT 02:17, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Fwiw, I also agree you are not ready for AFC reviewing. Johnbod (talk) 12:56, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

One of the drafts you have accepted and moved to mainspace, Draft:Ritesh Tiwari, has been moved back to the draft namespace. Please see Draft talk:Ritesh Tiwari#Moved back to draft for details on why the page was moved back. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 17:02, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello, One person can request me to creating an article about an Indian television show name Detective Didi starting on 9 Novr 2017 on Zee TV If you want more information about the show please searching on Google about this show thank you. And created this sir, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki (2668) (talk • contribs) 18:31, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello, HindWIKI. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

TonyBallioni (talk) 20:22, 6 December 2017 (UTC)