March 2008[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. —Travis^talk 02:23, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edit to Hockey Hall of Fame (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 02:27, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Hockey Hall of Fame, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. BigHairRef | Talk 02:28, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 1 month from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —Travis^talk 02:30, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to David Butcher, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. LegoK^ontribsT^alkM 02:31, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Six's thermometer, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tylerpuetz (talk) 04:11, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

The recent edit you made to Stevenson screen constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. nneonneo ^talk 03:33, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Six's thermometer. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. nneonneo ^talk 03:47, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Adam Smith has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ukexpat (talk) 02:14, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to John Maynard Keynes constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. ukexpat (talk) 02:16, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Adam Smith. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Deor (talk) 02:18, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to John Maynard Keynes. ... discospinster _talk 02:20, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

14:10, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
MalnadachBot (talk · contribs)

---

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to RPG-7 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Hardyplants (talk) 07:48, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Chiang Kai-shek has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. DoubleBlue (Talk) 05:31, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Yuvraj Singh has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Soliloquial^talk 03:27, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Matthew (name), you will be blocked from editing. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:42, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Anglo-Chinese School (Independent) worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:26, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Ong Teck Chin. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you.  FrostedΔ14  01:30, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Talk:Pendragon. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 01:59, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism to Premier League 'Top Scorer' section[edit]

You seem to have thought it amusing to put the names of you and your friends on the top scorer table.

I'll see to it you get barred. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomsega (talk • contribs) 09:22, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Kho kho. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. CardinalDan (talk) 05:02, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Japanese occupation of Malaya, North Borneo and Sarawak has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b (links: http://bruneiresources.blogspot.com/2008_07_01_archive.html, http://bruneiresources.blogspot.com/2008_07_01_archive.html (redirect from http://bruneiresources.blogspot.com/2008_07_01_archive.html)). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:04, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Teotihuacan, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 06:00, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Elaine Wan Chan. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 03:06, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Elaine Wan Chan. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alansohn (talk) 03:08, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Gnosticism has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. —SpaceFlight89 05:04, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Take a chill pill has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:30, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Emma Roberts has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Pfranson (talk) 04:30, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Yellow. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Pfranson (talk) 04:58, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Cell (biology) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 01:50, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Albert Winsemius has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tommy²⁰¹⁰ 04:28, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ALI ^{nom nom} 01:35, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Transformers (film), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:42, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to the page Transformers (film), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tbhotch^{Talk C.} 05:42, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Devil May Cry was changed by 203.116.55.2 (u) (t) deleting 25827 characters on 2010-09-15T06:45:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 06:45, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Pharming has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Rmosler | ● 08:22, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Saving Private Ryan has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. ForeverDusk ^☾ 04:50, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Elaine Wan Chan appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you.==Nightenbelle (talk) 02:18, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gallants. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.==Nightenbelle (talk) 02:23, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Shock (circulatory) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. StuGeiger (talk) 00:38, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dictatorship, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. ~~ Hi878 ^{(Come shout at me!)} 00:24, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dictatorship. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. ~~ Hi878 ^{(Come shout at me!)} 00:31, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Trombone, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 04:17, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Bongwarrior. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Fly because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:45, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Pengkalan Kempas[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. We recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with our policies so we maycollaborate in the future. Thank you! Mithrandir^∞ (Talk!) (Opus Operis) 10:56, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dan653. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Dementia, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dan653 (talk) 02:36, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BloodDoll. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Invasion of Kuwait, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. BloodDoll (talk) 05:55, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Invasion of Kuwait. BloodDoll (talk) 05:58, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ed and Lorraine Warren, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. GigglesnortHotel (talk) 16:24, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.