| No. | Concern |
|---|---|
1 |
The BARC proposal is not well defined and lacks detail. |
2 |
The Committee will prove redundant to the Arbitration Committee. |
3 |
The Committee will become an "ArbCom lite", another Arbitration Committee, but with lesser powers to effectively handle issues relating to administrators. |
4 |
The administrators' noticeboard provides for a better venue to desysop administrators. |
5 |
Bureaucrats were not selected to audit administrator conduct, but to determine consensus. |
6 |
This process will produce "witch hunts", where a small amount of evidence, or a grudge, would be enough to get an administrator removed. |
7 |
Bureaucrats may not want the extra authority or responsibility that the BARC proposal will place on them. |
8 |
Bureaucrats may not be active enough to ensure that BARC would run efficiently. |
9 |
The time alotted for a BARC proceeding is too little to accommodate less-active administrators. |
0 |
foobar |