Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/43/Test_Template_Info-Icon_-_Version_%282%29.svg/50px-Test_Template_Info-Icon_-_Version_%282%29.svg.png)
Usage
[edit]{{subst:GATable}}
The first column uses the same syntax as {{GAList}} and {{GAList2}} to indicate the current status of the article with respect to each criterion, as a parameter for {{GATable/item}}.
y
,yes
,pass
,good
,ok
,k
,+
,aye
all produce a pass symbol:n
,no
,fail
,bad
,nk
,-
,nay
all produce a fail symbol:?
,??
,???
,dunno
,question
,huh
all produce a question symbol:wtf
produces Wikipedia's "I am out of my comfort zone" symbol:hold
andon hold
produce the on hold symbol:neu
,neutral
andund
produce the neutral symbol:- blank or no input produces the unassessed symbol
If a review comment contains a url, it may not be recognised, and will show as "Pending". To fix this, add "3=" to the beginning of the comment (immediately after the vertical bar preceding the comment).
Optional parameters
[edit]An initial rating and comment for each criterion can be specified as follows.
{{subst:GATable |1a= |1acom= |1b= |1bcom= |2a= |2acom= |2b= |2bcom= |2c= |2ccom= |2d= |2dcom= |3a= |3acom= |3b= |3bcom= |4= |4com= |5= |5com= |6a= |6acom= |6b= |6bcom= |7= |7com=}}
In vertical format:
{{subst:GATable
| overcom =
| 1a =
| 1acom =
| 1b =
| 1bcom =
| 2a =
| 2acom =
| 2b =
| 2bcom =
| 2c =
| 2ccom =
| 2d =
| 2dcom =
| 3a =
| 3acom =
| 3b =
| 3bcom =
| 4 =
| 4com =
| 5 =
| 5com =
| 6a =
| 6acom =
| 6b =
| 6bcom =
| 7 =
| 7com =
}}
Add |instructions=yes
to add hidden text with reviewer instructions (from {{GAN/instructions}}). Any other or no value (the default) turns off the instructions.