Cannabis Ruderalis

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  MPJ-DK  12:08, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Sandra Blow[edit]

5x expanded by Worm That Turned (talk) and Staceydolxx (talk). Nominated by Worm That Turned (talk) at 13:10, 20 August 2016 (UTC).

Good 2 go review by — Maile (talk) 00:18, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Review by Maile
QPQ
  • August 17-24, 2016 QPQ review by Staceydo has not been used as a QPQ on any other nomination
Eligibility
  • Article created by 134.225.1.162 on June 22, 2005, and was 783 characters before expansion
  • 5X expansion began on August 13, 2016 and is currently 4267 characters "readable prose" (783 X 5 = 3915)
  • Article is NPOV, currently stable, no dispute tags
Sourcing
  • Every paragraph is sourced inline and online
  • Citations are appropriately formatted
  • No bare URLs
Hook
  • Hook is 106 characters, NPOV, stated in the article and sourced at the end of the sentence where mentioned
Image
  • No image used
Tools
  • Earwig's Copyvio Detector showed no issues of concern.
  • Labs Dup Detector run on each source shows no issues of concern
  • Dab solver (Disambig links tool) says there are no disambiguation links in the article
Article passes review. Good job, both of you. — Maile (talk) 00:18, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Leave a Reply