The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 03:13, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio issues; article is no longer visible

KOF Index of Globalization[edit]

• ... that the KOF Index of Globalization measures countries on the economic, political and social aspects of globalization? Source: "The KOF Index of Globalization is an Index which measures the three main dimensions of globalization." ([1])
  • ALT1:... that the KOF Index of Globalization considers economic, social and political aspects of globalization? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)

Moved to mainspace by User:Triptothecottage (talk). Nominated by Triptothecottage (talk) at 11:49, 10 February 2017 (UTC).

• - While the length and date are good, Earwigs Copyvio detector flagged the article with a 91% confidence rating. From a spot check it appears the article is a close paraphrasing/partial copy of this. I am also concerned about the article meeting potentially not meeting our general notability guidelines. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news. Mifter (talk) 05:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

• Thank you for your diligence and patience Mifter. On inspection the foundational content of the article was taken from that website. I have reported the article for investigation according to WP:CV101, but I would appreciate you checking that I have done so correctly. (And I have resigned as an AFC reviewer, since of the two articles I have accepted into mainspace, both have ended up being copyvios.) Regards, Triptothecottage (talk) 06:44, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

@Triptothecottage: I'll take a look now. Also, you shouldn't feel the need to resign as an AFC reviewer, this is a completely understandable mistake which I'm sure you won't make again. Funnily enough, I made the same mistake of not checking for copyvios when I was working in DYK a number of years ago. It doesn't make you a bad reviewer, it makes you human. Just run articles through Earwigs in the future and you should be good to go. Don't beat yourself up, we all make mistakes. The key is learning from them. Best, Mifter (talk) 06:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC)