This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There’s really no use for this article[edit]
I really don’t know why this page really exists. I mean, what’s the purpose…? Sure, it was fan-influential, but I whymake a Wikipedia article for this pokemon in particular? What are you planning to do, make articles for ‘em all? I don’t know…I think this is useless as long as Bulbapedia exists.. Inaturlist Lover (talk) 12:18, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
GA Review[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Wooloo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Brachy0008 (talk · contribs) 09:23, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Review[edit]
Hello! I will be reviewing the article. I am honoured to do so, as I’m kind of a Pokémon fan myself (guess my favourite Pokémon if you want to, but I can confirm it is not Wooloo). So far, the significant problem is the MoS violations.
Prose[edit]
- A mention of Shigeru Ohmori’s reaction to the critical reception of the Pokémon is not present in the prose, despite being in the lead.
- It should be there, first paragraph of reception, by his last name.
- Done!
- It should be there, first paragraph of reception, by his last name.
Sources/Citations[edit]
- (Optional) Try adding secondary sources, but I’ll leave them be if such sources are not available. I helped you with one of them.
- The only concern, the overuse of FN 7 (primary source). It’s used four times on this page.
- Should be fixed now. Fixed an oversight with a few missing accessdate.
- Done.
- Should be fixed now. Fixed an oversight with a few missing accessdate.
Copy-vios[edit]
- Nothing special from Earwig, but I’ll let that 26.5% be.
Images[edit]
- So far, so good!
- (Optional) If you can, try adding more Wooloo pics.
- I fear given the size of the article adding more than one might get called out for fair use rationale if I add another.
- That’s why it’s optional
- I fear given the size of the article adding more than one might get called out for fair use rationale if I add another.
@Brachy0008: Everything should be addressed!--Kung Fu Man (talk) 10:06, 10 August 2023 (UTC)