This review is transcluded from the article's talk page.

Reviewer: VersaceSpace (talk · contribs) 17:03, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article - Talk

Gonna review this. It may be worth noting that I added some content to the article a few months ago, but all of it has been re-written by an unrelated editor, so it'll be fine. versacespaceleave a message! 17:03, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead[edit]

• "but did not win in any category" can be omitted because this is implied already by the fact that they "were nominated".
• Also that inline citation in the second para is making me gag
• Infobox is good

 Fixed -- dylx ^{(t | c)} 04:13, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Background and recording[edit]

• specify what grammy awards the kids were alright were nominated for

 Fixed -- dylx ^{(t | c)} 04:13, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Composition[edit]

• "record with elements" -> "record which contains elements"
• The inline citations here should go behind each genre (behind the comma as well)
• Why is this section so short? Can we at least have a paragraph?

Concept and themes[edit]

• at the end of the section, why are single quotations used for the song lyrics when they aren't inside any normal quotations?

 Fixed -- dylx ^{(t | c)} 04:13, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Release and promotion[edit]

• The vinyl release still has a citation needed tag

Live performances[edit]

• "Do It" is wikilinked too many times here.
• "Forgive Me" is linked too much as well.

 Fixed -- dylx ^{(t | c)} 13:02, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception[edit]

• Good

Year-end lists[edit]

• Good

Awards and nominations[edit]

• Good

Commercial performance[edit]

• This section doesn't present a worldwide view of the topic. The album charted in other countries. How did it do there?

Track listing[edit]

• For track 8, "with Swae Lee and Mike Will Made It" doesn't need to be in small font.

 Fixed -- dylx ^{(t | c)} 13:04, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notes[edit]

• Good

Credits and personnel[edit]

• Throughout the section, the track markers in small font marked "1, 2" should be "1-2". Same with other chronological numbers.

 Fixed -- dylx ^{(t | c)} 16:37, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Instrumentation[edit]

• Wikilink the first instance of "strings" to string instrument

 Fixed -- dylx ^{(t | c)} 16:37, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Production[edit]

• Wikilink the first instance of "production" to music producer

 Fixed -- dylx ^{(t | c)} 16:37, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Technical[edit]

• Wikilink the first instance of "mixing" to music mixing
• Wikilink the first instance of "engineering" to music engineer

 Fixed -- dylx ^{(t | c)} 16:37, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Charts[edit]

• Good

Release history[edit]

• Good

References[edit]

• Ref 5: isn't Genius unreliable for lyrics?
• Refs 12, 28, 41...and 46, and 50...and 53, 54, 57, 71...72, uh...103, and 111, and 115, and also 116: un-wikilink Billboard (already wikilinked in citation 10)
• Refs 18, 56, 96, 97: un-wikilink UPROXX (already wikilinked in citation 17)
• Ref 22: Is the Medium article written by a professional? Anyone can write articles on there. See WP:UGC.
• Ref 23: should have MTV News un-wikilinked (already wikilinked in citation 6)
• Ref 25: un-wikilink BET (already wikilinked in citation 19)
• Ref 29: un-wikilink Twitter (already wiki-linked in citation 26)
• Ref 32, 82: un-wikilink Idolator (already wikilinked in citation 21)
• Refs 33, 35, 40, 93: un-wikilink Rated R&B (already wikilinked in citation 27)
• Ref 37: perhaps wikilink Chloe x Halle
• Ref 47: Honestly...that looks pretty unreliable, can we replace it?
• Refs 49 and 92: un-wikilink PopSugar (already wikilinked in citation 39)
• Ref 58: same story as 47, not liking that source
• Refs 65 and 90: un-wikilink Pitchfork (already wikilinked in citation 34)
• Ref 66: un-wikilink Rolling Stone (already wikilinked in citation 14)
• Ref 70: wikilink AP NEWS to Associated Press.
• Ref 73: un-wikilink Clash (already wikilinked in citation 9)
• Ref 74: un-wikilink Complex (already wikilinked in citation 31)
• Ref 76: un-wikilink The Fader (already wikilinked in citation 36)
• Refs 78 and 79: un-wikilink The Guardian (already wikilinked in citation 63)
• Ref 84: doesn't name the publication which released the article
• Ref 88: un-wikilink Our Culture Mag (already wiki-linked at citation 64)
• Ref 89: un-wikilink People (already wikilinked in citation 24)
• Ref 99: should have USA Today un-wikilinked (already wikilinked in citation 2)
• Ref 102: doesn't name the source used
• Ref 114: un-wikilink Official charts (already wikilinked at citation 113)

General comments[edit]

• That summarizes my concerns so this is  On hold.
• Oh, one more thing, wiki-linked songs should only be wikilinked on the first mention, in the tracklist, and in the infobox

Comments by other users (including the nominator)[edit]

@VersaceSpace: about the citation needed tag about the vinyl release, I don't see it on my end. can you specify where it appears so I can remove it? thank you! -- dylx ^{(t | c)} 12:25, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Dylx: looks like its been fixed already versacespaceleave a message! 12:27, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@VersaceSpace: another thing: I can't un-wikilink Twitter in ref 29, since it uses the {cite tweet} template. do you want me to replace the reference? -- dylx ^{(t | c)} 12:45, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I also can't un-wikilink Official Charts in refs 113 and 114, since they were created using the {album chart} template. -- dylx ^{(t | c)} 13:06, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Dylx: eh...in that case, I guess both could be left as is versacespaceleave a message! 13:08, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

okay! I believe up to this point, I've addressed all your concerns! thanks for taking the time to review this article, I appreciate it! -- dylx ^{(t | c)} 13:27, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• HeyitsBen, Dylx this looks good! I'm passing this article. ✓ Pass