Cetaceans Stub‑class (inactive)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cetaceans, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CetaceansWikipedia:WikiProject CetaceansTemplate:WikiProject CetaceansCetaceans articles Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 August 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): GreenJadeNeocaridina (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Ecokelbells, Ecogirly2001.

— Assignment last updated by Branchiobdellid (talk) 16:51, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Why does this need to be separate from Monodontidae, which only consists of two species anyway? FunkMonk (talk) 13:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  The family article has much more to discuss that just the hybrid. Or do you really want to just merge the hybrid article into the family article? - UtherSRG (talk) 14:28, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The family article could be much longer, sure, but I don't see why this entire narluga article couldn't just be a section in the family article. It's basically about a single specimen, it's not a recurring hybrid. But to make matters worse, this article seems to be bloated by what is largely WP:synth. FunkMonk (talk) 14:42, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I say take a machete to the OR first and see what's left. At that point, yes, probably merge into the family article. (Current merge tags don't indicate in which direction...) - UtherSRG (talk) 14:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like some of that text could actually be useful for general sections in the family article, as it talks about both species. FunkMonk (talk) 17:15, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Let's give this a week or so for others to weigh in, now that the articles have the merge tags, but I think this is a slam dunk. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:45, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]