This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistani districts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistani districts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pakistani districtsWikipedia:WikiProject Pakistani districtsTemplate:WikiProject Pakistani districtsPakistani districts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles
I have suggested to merge "Nagar, Pakistan" to "Nagar District" as both articles are talking about the same geographic location, former should be merged to article Nagar District, which is also the official name for the district. -- Kazmi1122 14:46, 05 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support merge, but in the other direction as Nagar, Pakistan is the broader title and article, covering both the town (Nagar Khas), district and history of the region. Klbrain (talk) 21:51, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose - I don't see the need for a merge. We have plenty of pages for villages and towns that have very minimal content because little is available in reliable sources. I agree that the current Nagar, Pakistan article is in very bad shape, combining all kinds of material about Nagar (princely state) and Nagar District. We should remove that and retain only the information about the Nagar town. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 03:25, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]