Cannabis Ruderalis

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 00:58, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Penny Richards (talk), Espresso Addict (talk), and Dr vulpes (talk). Nominated by Penny Richards (talk) at 02:20, 1 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article is recently substantially expanded x5, long enough, neutral and a QPQ is done. The only outstanding issues are a few citations that are missing - please ping me when they are filled :) It's great read about her life, thanks to the team for expanding the article. As a note, I much prefer ALT0. Lajmmoore (talk) 08:10, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lajmmoore and Penny Richards: I've sourced part of it (turns out actually reading the entire interview rather than skimming it and searching for the surname did the trick!) and removed the rest to the talk page. I think the five-folding shouldn't be a problem, it was very short before we started. I prefer Alt0 too, should we strike Alt1? Thanks, Espresso Addict (talk) 21:57, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Lajmmoore and Espresso Addict:: Strikethrough done (I never knew how to do that before, neat).Penny Richards (talk) 02:18, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Penny Richards and Espresso Addict: thanks so much both, its a green tick now! Lajmmoore (talk) 07:13, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information needing a reliable source[edit]

She was involved in establishing television programmes for the Open University.[citation needed] She was known for advising novice directors.[citation needed]

These were added by an anon editor sourced to a fanblog. I've investigated the blog and while it's a great resource, and I think the details are likely to be correct, there's no obvious reason for Wikipedia to consider it a reliable source. If the anon editor could come up with more reliable sources eg published interviews they can be replaced. Espresso Addict (talk) 21:36, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply