![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review[edit]
- This review is transcluded from Talk:La Grange Historic District (North Carolina)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: APK (talk · contribs) 09:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: 48JCL (talk · contribs) 00:48, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I am excited to review this article.
It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
- b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
I’m sorry, but the CN tag is an issue for a GAN.
- Fixed. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- b (citations to reliable sources):
sources are reliable! Gov websites are working.
- c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
This was so tedious to do but thats a pass
It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
Contains major aspects.
- b (focused):
doesn’t really focus on minor aspects. So pass!
It follows the neutral point of view policy. Nice job! This article strives for the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
Pretty easy pass. Very few authors.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
Yep, images are tagged, that’s a pass
- b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Captions are fine, however, when you say, 130 South Caswell Stret is one of many commercial buildings in need of repair, do you mean street?
Recommend alt text. @APK
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Source Check[edit]
Forgot to add this! Pretty short article, took like 30 minutes. Passing!
Final comments[edit]
PASSING! But please add alt text lol @APK
- Thank you very much. APK hi :-) (talk) 03:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC)