This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Serbia: Belgrade Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Belgrade task force (marked as High-importance). University of Belgrade (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Belgrade, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.University of BelgradeWikipedia:WikiProject University of BelgradeTemplate:WikiProject University of BelgradeUniversity of Belgrade articles

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jevremovac. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20121222172357/http://www.bfbot.bg.ac.rs/ to http://www.bfbot.bg.ac.rs/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:56, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What is this "object" the article keeps referring to, and that apparently needed to be "legalized"? Can someone who knows what it is please copyedit the article so it makes sense? Pinging PajaBG. Largoplazo (talk) 17:22, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I used the term "object" because initially no one knew what this is going to be in the end, and because it remained unfinished. Guess I can replace it with "edifice" or "building" in the first sentence. As the article says, "the legal permits weren't obtained", which makes the building illegal. As this is a common thing here, we have a legal process called "legalization". Basically, it makes illegal edifice legal after the fact - after the construction began or, in most cases, when it has been already finished. If in English some other term is used for this type of retroactive legal confirmation, I will replace "legalization" with it. I wasn't looking further, as Webster defined legalization as "to make legal; especially: to give legal validity", so I thought it fits the purpose. PajaBG (talk) 17:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The term "structure" seems suitable rather than "object". You might say "permitting" will be completed. Although—I don't believe I've ever seen a Wikipedia article about a building that mentioned a detail like the permitting process, and I wouldn't expect it in the absence of a noteworthy event, such as significant opposition to it or extraordinary barriers to obtaining it. Largoplazo (talk) 18:04, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On a general note, if you'd live here, you'd know about obtaining all sorts of permits, corrupt and impotent administration, (il)legal shortcuts, after-the-fact and after-the-fact-after-the-fact corrupt processes which in the end lead to nothing :) One of the most luxurious hotels in Belgrade, Hyatt Regency, was opened in 1990, and I am not sure if it obtained technical acceptance certificate (literal translation - usage permit) by this day. Here, I mentioned it because present management claims that they have unfinished structure on the premises for 25 years cause they were unable to finish it due to the lack of permits. Well, now they got it. PajaBG (talk) 21:01, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]