This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Pharmacology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Chemicals Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

My computer is pretty unstable so I have been trying to save often, but I should have written more before I saved the page. Enix150 (talk) 02:04, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Phenylacetylindole redirects here. I don't think it's correct. Especially since we have now a loop: a link from this article redirects back to the same one. Any ideas how to fix it? Tryptamines (talk) 07:31, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't sure what to do here to stop the looping, other than remove the internal link. It is phenylacetylindole because all phenylacetylindoles are substitutions of this structure; in much the same way that JWH-018 is naphthoylindole. Enix150 (talk) 11:58, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think that there should be a separate article for phenylacetylindole itself, or even better for the phenylacetylindoles as a group (or sth like substituted phenylacetylindoles, as there is substituted amphetamines). Same applies to naphtoylindoles. I won't write them though, because of lack of knowledge. Tryptamines (talk) 03:45, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]