This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Composers, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project discussion page is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!ComposersWikipedia:WikiProject ComposersTemplate:WikiProject ComposersComposers articles
Christopher Saint Booth is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
The birth date is off by a year. FreeBMD suggests a birth quarter of Jan-Feb-Mar 1960 for the twins, born in Halifax. 92.40.217.156 (talk) 13:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I sort of agree with this, however Christopher and Philip as individual articles still makes sense, as they're members in a duo. Maybe Christopher and Philip Booth as its own separate article without merging the two would make more sense. Legreatcharl (talk) 00:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC) — Legreatcharl (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
I think, all told, it's a Trey Parker and Matt Stone thing where they are really famous for one thing, the both of them, but both cases are interesting. Phillip and Christopher are cult figures on the internet, so I vote keeping them seperate if (christopher only) or (philip only) is too prevalent. draft that duo article for now, and we all can make a better-informed decision from there. BarntToust (talk) 21:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think a duo-article is a good idea, but they're both seperate enough individuals that they warrant seperate articles. Like Legreatcharl said, this could be a third article for the both of them. XanderK09 (talk) 03:21, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think I can agree on a separate article as a due and leaving the Christopher and Philip ones as separate, although I would say that having the title be "Who's Who" would be better IMO since its what they're currently going as (as well as what they went as in the 80s). I think Who's Who (band) could be good, although it currently redirects to Daniel Vangarde. I think a disambiguation page that links to both would be good if this is created. reppoptalk01:27, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]