This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Serbia: Belgrade High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Belgrade task force (marked as High-importance). Architecture High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Skyscrapers High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

"For a long time the Beograđanka was Belgrade's highest building." For how long? Needs more precision to be a useful info.

Also, the entire "Remodeling" section: "The city of Belgrade plans to remodel the building by cleaning the exterior facade, reconstructing the entry to the building, and even reopening the restaurant on the top floor." is also not really useful, because there is no date when this is decided to be done, nor when it is going to be done, nor there are sources noted. Isn't it obligatory to post a source of the information too when adding info to an article?

I am sorry I can not contribute to making this article any better, because I don't know anything about it, but at least remove this information or improve it so it can be useful to someone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.185.127.248 (talk) 22:33, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]