Cannabis Ruderalis

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Σ (talk · contribs) 01:30, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've taken a quick look at it, and in general it is good. I will add some comments here after reading it more thoroughly. →Στc. 02:26, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

  • ...discern how far the Germans had gone towards creating an atomic bomb. I believe that discern German progress towards the creation of an atomic bomb. reads better.
  • Alsos Mission personnel followed close behind the front lines...capture by the Soviet Union. Seems unnecessarily long. I would try splitting it in two.

Origin[edit]

Italy[edit]

Western Europe[edit]

Britain[edit]

France[edit]

Germany[edit]

  • There is a single-sentence paragraph at the bottom, although it isn't a major concern.

Japan[edit]

Legacy[edit]

See also[edit]

Στc. 06:28, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Assessment[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


I'm happy with the article.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Leave a Reply