Cannabis Ruderalis

Contested deletion[edit]

@Kirbanzo: In what way is this promotional content? It is a neutrally phrased article about an organization in Ontario established 112 years ago. The only problem I see with this article is a lack of sources, and that shouldn't qualify it for a speedy deletion. (Perhaps you object to the activities section?) Mindmatrix 16:57, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

I accepted this draft from AFC, as I believe notability has been established, and the article is no longer promotional as it was when it was deleted.

I have one question: Why does this article use the Harvard notation style? What advantages does this offer for this type of article, and what would be the difficulties in switching to the standard style? Bradv 03:29, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply