This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Railways This page is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles This page is supported by WikiProject Indian railways. Trains: in India Trains Portal This page is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Associated projects or task forces: /  This page is supported by WikiProject Indian railways.

Hello everyone,

I am nominationg to delete Indore–Ajmer Link Express, Indore–Bandra Express, Indore–Surat Express, Rajendra Nagar Patna – Indore Express, Indore–Jaipur Express via Ajmer because they are a reglar trains.

Ujjain - Bhopal passenger, Bhopal–Pratapgarh Express, Indore–Jabalpur Intercity Express, Jabalpur – Indore Overnight Express,Indore–Delhi Sarai Rohilla Express. These pages already exsist. Thank you.

Jaywardhan (talk) 20:20, July 14, 2017 (IST)

Hey guys, I am currently trying to improve the WAG-9 class to GA status. While going through the page, I noticed that the Technical specifications section is too long. Since most of importance tech specs are in the infobox, Should we remove the section--Area 51 Machan (talk) 12:10, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Area 51 Machan, I love that we all are trying to make GA articles because our project badly needs them. Indian Railways was a FA but then got demoted, the only GAs we have are Delhi Metro, Fairy Queen and WDG4G. Coming back to your question, yea the tabled part is too big: that info can be kept in the infobox while the Technical section must contain prose mostly. Good luck with your endeavor. Regards, Field Marshal (talk) 13:33, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Field Marshal Aryan, it's tough to maintain FA status of Indian Railways. Even GA is tough for that. ❯❯❯   S A H A 15:24, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArnabSaha, Yea. It contains a lot of WP:CITELEAD which is an immediate no-no. I imagine, one day, when I have the time, I would get back to cleaning it up. Until then CVU and a little bit of GA seems alright :-) Field Marshal (talk) 18:15, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Field Marshal Aryan, there are multiple unsourced paras also. it immediately needs a copyedit. if you have goce slots, then I will say to request for that. after that, in the mean time, we can improve it. ❯❯❯   S A H A 18:23, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

wikiproject india meeting never gonna happen. we can do a wikiproject ir meeting. pinging Field Marshal Aryan ❯❯❯   S A H A 13:38, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArnabSaha, Hey I didn't receive your ping because you added the ping after you singed it. Regarding the meet, I am willing to do a chat based meet only. This community (WP:IRW) is too small for anything like that. Regards, Field Marshal (talk) 18:18, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Field Marshal Aryan, ok then no problem. but where to do? WP:Discord. ❯❯❯   S A H A 18:25, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArnabSaha, Sure. Field Marshal (talk) 18:26, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Area 51 Machan, Suvadeep Saha56, SHISHIR DUA, Feroze Ahmad 2, ImSonyR9, 123sarangi, and Jazze7: pinging for more opinion. ❯❯❯   S A H A 05:37, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decent is ur suggestion, I'd, indubitably, be available for chat based meetings.

Regards SHISHIR DUA (talk) 10:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SHISHIR DUA, thanks. we will try to conduct it asap ❯❯❯   S A H A 16:30, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can also make myself available for a meeting. Please let me know. Radhamadhab Sarangi^{Talk|Contribs} 15:42, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

iaspostb□x 01:24, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Aya Syameimaru!: cool, no? Just curious, how did you find it? Regards, Field Marshal (talk) 05:35, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I found it at Template:Wikipedia ads and Template:Wikipedia ads/navbox. It's a cool ad. iaspostb□x 06:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Aya Syameimaru!, great! I just wanted to see how far this has reached. :-) Field Marshal (talk) 14:22, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow editors ! I have a doubt regarding inclusion of individual articles on normal passenger trains (which are ~ 15,000 in India). For example articles like Indore–Ajmer_Link_Express, Rajendra_Nagar_Patna–Indore_Express. These both examples are completely normal trains, which clear fails WP:GNG and their is no other subject specific guidelines for trains (that I am able to find). Most of these articles (that I have gone through) are unsourced or poorly sourced stubs. I believe that these articles should not be included on English Wikipedia, this may also be a case of WP:NOTTRAVEL. Can someone provide their views about it and what is the general consensus regarding it ? Thanks. Zoodino (talk) 15:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Zoodino. We don't get a lot of visitors here! Unfortunately I won't be able to respond fully right now as I'm about to go to sleep (IST). I would try to answer that question in my full capacity tomorrow. Until then, I would suggest you to have a look at this discussion that took place over here over a decade ago. Warm regards, Field Marshal (talk) 19:24, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Field Marshal Aryan: Thanks for guiding me to the archived discussion. But the discussion seems to be inadequate. The number of participants are very less. The statements such as "I feel each named train is notable just like people who say each village is notable", seems to be the editor's personal opinion without any backing from any of Wikipedia's notability policy. Their is also no clear result of the discussion.

Can we have a general discussion again (here only, just inputs from other editors) on the topic (if possible), so we can reach a general consensus whether such articles should be created or not. Zoodino (talk) 11:06, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Zoodino: Yep. The old discussion was pretty much inconclusive. We surely can, and seeing the huge mess this subject is, must have a discussion, even though not many are active here. I am pinging a few editors I know who can help (Vatsmaxed, ArnabSaha, Area 51 Machan, User:Naveenpf.

Some the named trains should stay like Lucknow Mail or the Gujarat Mail or even the legendary Deccan Queen while the slower passengers and MEMUs, as you said, are certainly not notable at all. The category that is the most problematic is Slow and fast passenger trains in India whereas some (actually, a lot) cleanup will be needed in Express trains in India. I will wait for more opinions now. Pinging the active editors of the old discussion: Logicwiki, Ekabhishek. To the people I pinged, sorry for disturbing: You have no obligation to participate if you are not willing. Thanks, Field Marshal (talk) 15:10, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Field Marshal Aryan: Thanks for being interested in the discussion and pinging other editors. As mentioned already by you, these stub articles seems to be mess. Cleaning up these articles will surely improve the project quality and unnecessary backlog. Waiting for more opinions. Zoodino (talk) 04:38, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zoodino, I agree. Articles like these aren't required. Also we need to asses them individually. ❯❯❯   S A H A 07:31, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think this WikiProject could benefit from coordinators who would help in the maintenance and upkeep of the wikiproject along with providing assistance to the members. At any given time, there should be a maximum of two coordinators. This will also, in a way, ensure that the project doesn't go dead like it was previously. Interested editors may enlist their names below and we can conduct a voting process. Note: This is starting out as a test; If enough people oppose having any coordinators at all, this whole thing will be scrapped. Pinging ArnabSaha as it is mainly his idea. Regards, Field Marshal (talk) 16:28, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]