Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Bdj (talk | contribs)
TJ Spyke (talk | contribs)
Line 7: Line 7:
***'''Comment''' Lets be realistic about this, and like Nick said, if we simply delete the article it will probably be remade. We really dont need this article though in my opinion, maybe just a short paragraph in the Guitar Hero II article. [[User:Cablebfg|Cablebfg]] 21:19, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
***'''Comment''' Lets be realistic about this, and like Nick said, if we simply delete the article it will probably be remade. We really dont need this article though in my opinion, maybe just a short paragraph in the Guitar Hero II article. [[User:Cablebfg|Cablebfg]] 21:19, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. Does not meet crystal ball standard. --[[User:Badlydrawnjeff|badlydrawnjeff]] <small>[[User_talk:Badlydrawnjeff|talk]]</small> 21:48, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. Does not meet crystal ball standard. --[[User:Badlydrawnjeff|badlydrawnjeff]] <small>[[User_talk:Badlydrawnjeff|talk]]</small> 21:48, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' There is no info at all for this game other than Activision plans to release a new Guitar Hero game. Also, keeping an article just because it will be created again in the future is not a reason to keep (otherwise we would keep the articles about sporting events 20 years away). [[User:TJ Spyke|TJ Spyke]] 02:44, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:44, 27 December 2006

Guitar Hero III

Guitar Hero III (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

This article lacks any first party sources and the two sources it does have indicate that Guitar Hero II will be going multiplatform and that Guitar Hero III will be made eventually. The information on the article itself is pure speculation and contains no factual data regarding the potential game itself. There is quite literally no information about the game aside from a VERY vague release date as reported by a third party. While I personally believe there'll probably be a Guitar Hero III, WP:NOT demands that we not treat Wikipedia as a Crystal Ball. Lankybugger 19:30, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment There is a reliable source citing a release date. If we delete the article now someone will just re-create it. The series is popular enough that the article name should at least be redirected if not preserved. There have been several speculative edits. I would suggest keeping the page, but protecting it until there is more public information available. - NickSentowski 19:48, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment Perhaps a redirect to Guitar Hero would be sufficient until confirmed, verifiable information has been released? Currently the article is a collection of factoids and common knowledge and while Activision is PLANNING to release more Guitar Hero sequels there's been indications that future Harmonix releases might not be rock-related... I doubt they'd release a Country-themed guitar game as a core-series sequel, for example. Lankybugger 20:19, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Comment Lets be realistic about this, and like Nick said, if we simply delete the article it will probably be remade. We really dont need this article though in my opinion, maybe just a short paragraph in the Guitar Hero II article. Cablebfg 21:19, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Does not meet crystal ball standard. --badlydrawnjeff talk 21:48, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There is no info at all for this game other than Activision plans to release a new Guitar Hero game. Also, keeping an article just because it will be created again in the future is not a reason to keep (otherwise we would keep the articles about sporting events 20 years away). TJ Spyke 02:44, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply