You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:The Fairly OddParents#Confirmation show has been cancelled. Please discuss this before changing related articles Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:25, 11 February 2018 (UTC)Template:Z48[reply]

See File:Tennessee Titans wordmark, 2018.svg. Just for future reference, you're better off requesting on my Wikipedia talkpage as I don't edit on Commons very often, and when I do, I don't have notifications to let me know someone posted there. Corky 18:25, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here we go. Did you block the page? 530Pres (talk) 04:04, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Or notify an admin to lock the page? 530Pres (talk) 04:22, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? I have no control or interest over that. It's not my problem if a vandal attacks, it's the mods.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 05:27, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. I just really wanted to make the obvious change about Aaron Rodgers being the owner of the Bears after that comeback in week one. Saw that you were the last one to make a change to their page and I read your profile and saw that you take this site pretty serious. Stay in school and don’t do drugs or get a girl pregnant. 530Pres (talk) 08:09, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lol as if I have any chance of getting a girl pregnant. I'm too chicken to even socialize many times out of school.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 22:52, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GalaxyFighter55. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, any reasoning for reverting? I know it's the same on every page (i guess), maybe this needs discussion as we link everything once, but the teams? Makes no sense. Kante4 (talk) 19:38, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anything? Kante4 (talk) 11:47, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• List of Nickelodeon original films (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This is starting to look like an edit war. Please see {{uw-3rr}}. EdJohnston (talk) 17:06, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of Nickelodeon original films‎; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:13, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is irrelevant. You still re-added the controversial content that you've been reverted on, and you could have easily been reported to WP:ANEW. Instead, you should have just gone straight to adding your other sources rather than making that pointless edit simply stating you would do such, which also reintroduced the material you've been reverted on. Or better yet, use the talk page to discuss it like you were pointed to from the beginning instead of yelling at other people when it was your obligation to initiate discussion. Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:23, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]