This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

India: Cinema List‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles List This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance). Business List‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles List This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Film: Indian List‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles List This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force. Lists List‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles List This article has been rated as List-class on the project's quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The source provided for the movie Kayamkulam kochunni is not reliable according to the Wikipedia policies. In the source it is purely given that the 100cr news was shared by the actor himself. Please make the change according to itHackerwala111 (talk) 06:31, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's a good point. Looking at ManoramaOnline.com, which details the various revenue streams, if we start with 102.32 crore and subtract 7.5 crore for Hindi, dubbing, and audio/video rights, that leaves 94.82 crore. Then subtract satellite and digital gross of 15 crore which is never factored into box office revenue, that puts us at 79.82 crore. And while I wouldn't consider FilmiBeat a quality source for box office info, they cast doubt on the 100 crore claim here. I'll leave this available in case any other editors at this article want to chime in. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:27, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cyphoidbomb Even the ManoramaOnline.com not confirming the news they saying that reportedly only not confirming. If it can be added many more malayalam movies can add to the listHackerwala111 (talk) 09:59, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cyphoidbomb Brother in the section Malayalam movies sources are reliable according to Wikipedia policies.... [1] is it a reliable source????Hackerwala111 (talk) 10:21, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Live Mint is a highly reliable and reputed national newspaper. 137.97.240.168 (talk) 08:48, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you suggest the reliable sources that can be used in wikipedia. Is Inuth is a rliable source. You have removed many of the sources as reliable. You only focussing on Mohanlal movies.Hackerwala111 (talk) 09:07, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cyphoidbomb Why are you not yet removing the moving Kayamkulam Kochunni. The source and you itself says its a doubtful figure also the source says it has been said by the actor itself. You are adding this and you are not yet adding The Great Father 50cr gross. So anyone can say you are focusing only on Mohanlal movies... Admin please reply for this statement Hackerwala111 (talk) 04:43, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hackerwala111...he will not do it...i have been asking the same questions for past few months...Cyphoidbomb...admins/guys like you are the one soley responsible for people believeing that wiki is not reliable any more...go and get life man...Oppam 65 munthiri 50,abraham and great father not in list...dude do one thing...add neerali as 75 cr,drama 80 cr..remove all other actors and add lals movie only in the list and try to make peole believe ...now a days people using internet understand very well about wiki edit and guys like you...dont be insecure ..watever lal do...people have a place in their mind ..same as mam..thats not going to change...pathetic...

Please link Krishnadev Yagnik's Wikipedia Article in Gujarati Films section. Radadiyageet (talk) 12:34, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Done here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:06, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bajrangi Bhaijaan, Uri, 2.0 and TOH have all stopped playing in cinemas since a long time. Please remove the green background in the cells from them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justlookingforthemoment (talk • contribs) 08:36, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Telugu movies gross is wrong. How can Srimanthudu be at Position 10 while others are higher. You're not talking all the movies from same source. You take whatever you want and wherever it is higher so that mega family movies come at the top 49.207.48.220 (talk) 07:28, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. DannyS712 (talk) 08:06, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IP editor, I don't understand what your complaint is. We have to use different sources since in India there is no centrally reliable source equivalent to Box Office Mojo. Where there is a difference of opinion about a film's gross, as there is with Srimanthudu, we typically present that information in the form of a range. So if that film made between 144-200 crore per the various sources, we can't just push it to the top of the list. The only thing we know for sure is that it made at least 144 crore. That's why it's at the bottom. I personally don't think it's a smart idea for Wikipedia to be ranking these films, but there hasn't been a fruitful discussion about that here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:35, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all, won't it be better if an image would be present at the beginning of the article, such as the image of the film poster of Dangal, the Highest Grossing Indian film ever. It would then accompany the article in previews, etc. and may give a nice visual presentation, such as the poster of the film Gone with the Wind, the highest grossing film adjusted for inflation ever, in the article List of highest-grossing films. Also, won't it look nice if some more images of the directors, film posters etc. were present throughout the article, just like the latter one? So, would anyone consider adding them? Thanks! Justlookingforthemoment (talk) 11:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Justlookingforthemoment: Hi there, we can't use a copyrighted image, the Dangal poster, in a way that is not covered by fair-use guidelines. We can use the poster in the Dangal article, because we are legitimately using the poster to help people identify the article subject. In this highest-grossing films list, we would be using it for decoration, which is not a legitimate use of a non-free image. In contrast, the Gone with the Wind poster appears to be in the public domain, as detailed at File:Poster - Gone With the Wind 01.jpg, so there are few, if any, restrictions on its usage. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:40, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb: Oh thanks, I got it! But I wonder if anyone would be having their own work of pictures related to film directors, actors, producers etc. (anything other than film posters) that can be uploaded on this article, since it is a highly popular page (considering the average amount of views it receives per day; that value being about 26,000)^[1] and does not have a single image! It seems weird to me. Thanks! Justlookingforthemoment (talk) 11:22, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]