This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

India: Cinema List‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles List This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance). Business List‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles List This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Film: Indian List‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles List This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force. Lists List‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles List This article has been rated as List-class on the project's quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Villain movie starring Shivaraj kumar and Kiccha sudeepa has become the highest grossing kannada movie with 123 crore rupees world wide gross , so please update the list SUHAS JAYANNA (talk) 19:07, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The villain movie to cross 100 cr in 15 days please update Chiranth01 (talk) 18:38, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The villain makers have claimed 60cr ww in first week Chiranth01 (talk) 18:40, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://mtwiki.blogspot.com/2018/10/top-10-highest-grossing-kannada-movies-of-all-time-by-worldwide-box-office-collection.html?m=1 Even according to this website the villain collection is 123crs make the necessary changes Chiranth01 (talk) 18:52, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://movie-rater.com/the-villain-movie-review-and-box-office-collections-hit-or-flop.html in this website the first 17 days of the villain is given in detailed that is 109crs . Make the changes the villain Kannada top grosser Chiranth01 (talk) 12:48, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiranth01: You do realise that anybody can start a blog and publish whatever nonsense they want, right? We don't use blogs or other random websites as sources. Find a major mainstream publication that agrees with the claim you are making. That means a major news website, for instance. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:00, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/will-shiva-rajkumar-s-villain-reach-magic-rs-100-crore-mark-90621 is this fine the villain collection report week 1 @Cyphoidbomb Chiranth01 (talk) 10:02, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiranth01: Yeah, nice try. That source is repeating speculation by distributors that the film could cross 100. Prediction ≠ fact. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 12:59, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb but it clearly said that it collected 60cr first week Chiranth01 (talk) 15:08, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiranth01: It says "the distributors of the Kannada movie The Villain disclosed that the film had made Rs 60 crore during the first weekend". The distributors would constitute a primary source, and we should be circumspect about the claims made by directors, producers, actors, distributors and anybody else with a conflict of interest, as all these people have an incentive to inflate figures. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:31, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But primary source can be taken as estimated collection for the villain Cyphoidbomb If so what about hebbuli this article says that amala paul and kiccha sudeep starrer movie hebbuli as grossed above 100crs shttps://www.thenewsminute.com/article/hebbuli-s-huge-success-amala-paul-gets-tag-rs-100-crore-actor-61504 Chiranth01 (talk) 04:29, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But primary source can be taken as estimated collection for the villain @Cyphoidbomb If so what about hebbuli this article says that amala paul and kiccha sudeep starrer movie hebbuli as grossed above 100crs shttps://www.thenewsminute.com/article/hebbuli-s-huge-success-amala-paul-gets-tag-rs-100-crore-actor-61504 Chiranth01 (talk) 04:32, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiranth01: You posted the same thing twice, three minutes apart. Do you think you can handle having a constructive conversation about this, or are you just going to post a bunch of stuff over and over? Please provide a Wikipedia approved guideline that says that "primary source can be taken as estimated collection for the villain", because I'm unaware of that being a rule, and I've been around for a long time. I also don't understand your Hebbuli counter-argument, so you might want to be a bit more explanatory the next time you post. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:48, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb https://newsable.asianetnews.com/entertainment/puneeth-rajkumar-sudeep-yash-darshan-salary-raajakumara-anjaniputra-kannada-stars-salary when this can be taken as source for rajkumara Kannada movie . Why can't the source given by me be taken ? Chiranth01 (talk) 13:39, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The source given by me are much better than the sources used in many places in this page so I think u can do the necessary changes the either way and hebbuli was not counter but question for u y it was not taken as a source @Cyphoidbomb Chiranth01 (talk) 13:47, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the year-wise conversion in Malayalam table. Someone added it recently. It's inconsistent with other tables. 137.97.84.63 (talk) 07:39, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:02, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove the semi-protected in this page so that everyone ecspecially main editors of Wikipedia may edit the page. Simtaangaran (talk) 08:36, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

KGF : chapter 1 has world wide gross collection of 121 crores in 8 days

reliable source - https://www.businesstoday.in/trending/box-office/kgf-box-office-collection-day-8-yash-movie-becomes-fourth-biggest-south-indian-dubbed-film-of-all-time/story/305173.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SUHAS JAYANNA (talk • contribs) 15:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply] 

hello some one respond and kindly update KGF collections — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.129.89.24 (talk) 13:31, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KGF chapter 1 kannada Day 10 collection is 152 crore, please update . here is the reliable source - https://www.businesstoday.in/trending/box-office/kgf-box-office-collection-day-10-costliest-kannada-movie-makes-rs-152-20-crore-worldwide/story/305539.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by SUHAS JAYANNA (talk • contribs) 18:48, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Everyone is asking for bahubali added into Tamil section. I have a suggestion... Big movies earn big amounts in every language. Why don't you add exact collection of movie in that language and overall collections in Indian section. For example.... Bahubali 2 In hindi section No1. 517cr In Telgu section No1. 283cr In Tamil section No2. 157cr In Kannada section No1. 90-110cr In malayalam section No2. 70cr Anurag Anand 1815131 (talk) 23:36, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Anurag Anand: Firstly, we don't typically track income for dubbed films. Baahubali is unique in that it was shot simultaneously in two languages. Secondly, there is already a glaring lack of reliable and consistent financial data for Indian films, and for some films it's a crapshoot whether we get data at all, let alone reliable data from sources that aren't just some random guy in an internet cafe claiming to be a film industry analyst. I just don't see that happening, and given how there is so much friction between Indian ethnic identities, I can't see how it makes sense to point out in the incomplete list of Bengali top ten films that, "yeah, a Baahubali dub made more than your highest-grossing home-made film", or that once again with its sheer number of speakers, a Hindi film dub once again dominated the market. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:27, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

KGF chapter 1 day 13 collection is 175 crores

here is reliable source - https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/regional-cinema/story/kgf-box-office-collection-day-13-yash-film-is-a-blockbuster-1422362-2019-01-03

please update — Preceding unsigned comment added by SUHAS JAYANNA (talk • contribs) 04:03, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

yes admin please Update KGF chapter 1 collections - 175 crores — Preceding unsigned comment added by GARUDA BHARGHAVA (talk • contribs) 06:44, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please change the total (worldwide) grossing of K.G.F: Chapter 1. to INR 175 cr. Find the reference here - https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/regional-cinema/story/kgf-box-office-collection-day-13-yash-film-is-a-blockbuster-1422362-2019-01-03 Sujaypatil96 (talk) 03:47, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:20, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is slight rearrangement to be made in the list of highest grossing films in TELUGU. It's indeed surprising to see that Aravinda Sametha Veera Raghava(2018) and Mahanati(2018) are not even in the list. I think it's high time this section has to be updated Rangasthalam(currently 4th) should be swapped with Bharat Ane Nenu(3rd) and Attarintiki Daredi should be swapped with Magadheera

SOURCES: http://www.indianmoviestats.com/topgrossing.html?Lang=Telugu&Year=AllTime https://www.filmibeat.com/telugu/news/2015/all-time-top-10-telugu-movies-at-tollywood-box-office/articlecontent-pf93268-189442.html https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/telugu/movies/news/Attarintiki-Daredi-collections-crossed-Magadheera/articleshow/24776427.cms https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/regional-cinema/story/tollywood-mid-year-report-blockbusters-in-2018-rangasthalam-bharat-ane-nenu-mahanati-1278333-2018-07-05

Read more at: https://www.mirchi9.com/movienews/records-between-attarintiki-daredi-and-magadheera/ 122.171.228.255 (talk) 05:25, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: At least four of the five references you've submitted are not sufficient for consideration. Nobody cares what indianmoviestats.com says, and Filmibeat is not considered a reliable source for financial data. Not sure why you think mirchi9.com is a sufficient reference, but I've never heard of it. Also, a source like this, which vaguely says that "Attarintiki Daredi collections crossed Magadheera" is not helpful, since there's no vetted gross amounts included so that we might provide context, and the content is ultimately attributed to way2movies.com, a source that is not a popular, reliable outlet. So why don't you go back through your post and try to re-establish your argument with references we can use. See WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources for guidance. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:54, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please update the current box office collection of Simmba from highest grossing franchise and film series. Bloody Knight Rider (talk) 18:31, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bloody Knight Rider:  Not done We don't do any changes without proper references from mainstream sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy. That means well-known mainstream sources. See WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources and resubmit your request if you can find a mainstream source that supports the change you want made. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:13, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look please - http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/movie/simmba/box-office/#bh-movie-box-office

Bloody Knight Rider (talk) 10:13, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

KGF :chapter 1 worldwide gross as on Day 17 is 198.5 crores here is the source - https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/regional-cinema/story/kgf-box-office-collection-day-17-yash-film-inches-towards-rs-200-crore-mark-1425001-2019-01-07 please update — Preceding unsigned comment added by GARUDA BHARGHAVA (talk • contribs) 08:52, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Highest grossing Marathi movies

9th position change Me ShivajiRaje Bhosale Boltoy to Naal

Year : 2018 Director :Sudhakar Reddy Yakkanti Studio Aatpat Productions Worldwide Gross: 31.7 crores Source: https://www-sacnilk-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.sacnilk.com/articles/entertainment/box_office/amp/Naal_Box_Office_Collection_Day_Wise_Worldwide?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&hl=en&usqp=mq331AQECAFYAQ%3D%3D#aoh=15456589350817&amp_ct=1545658967166&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fsacnilk.com%2Farticles%2Fentertainment%2Fbox_office%2FNaal_Box_Office_Collection_Day_Wise_Worldwide%3Fhl%3Den Savill007 (talk) 15:58, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Sacnilk.com, whatever that is, is not a reliable source with an established reputation for fact checking and accuracy. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:06, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

KGF chapter 1 gross 201 crores

here is the source - https://www.indiatoday.in/amp/movies/regional-cinema/story/kgf-box-office-collection-day-18-yash-film-remains-steady-1425855-2019-01-08 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kothi thimma (talk • contribs) 05:35, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Update kgf's box office figures to 201.5 cr from 175 cr. In highest grossing films by language, Kannada. For reference, Google kgf

here is the source - https://www.indiatoday.in/amp/movies/regional-cinema/story/kgf-box-office-collection-day-18-yash-film-remains-steady-1425855-2019-01-08

Another source https://www.timesnownews.com/entertainment/box-office/article/kgf-box-office-yash-starrer-creates-history-becomes-the-first-kannada-film-to-go-past-rs-200-crore-mark-globally/343472

Just a query: is IMDb a reliable source for box office figures? If so, then the data on the Kannada box office is inconsistent with the list there.

This is the imdb list: https://m.imdb.com/list/ls063689880/

223.237.251.150 (talk) 16:09, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Presented as range of 200-201 crore, per the references you provided. No, IMDB is not considered a reliable source for box office figures. Or anything, really. See WP:RS/IMDB. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:33, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arjun Reddy has collection Rs.510 crores at the box office, but it isn't mentioned in the top 20, nor in the highest telugu movies. 202.61.120.170 (talk) 18:41, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. DannyS712 (talk) 19:51, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is about ranking of the Film 2.0 in the global Ranking and the Tamil films ranking list. Please update Reference No. 24. to the following updated reference: https://thenewsrecorder.in/2-0-total-box-office-collection-day-40/

As per the article the global gross of the movie is Rs 857 crore. This will also push the movie to rank no. 5. Mdiggin (talk) 10:53, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: @Mdiggin: What is "The News Recorder" that we would, without scrutiny or question, consider their claims reliable? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:15, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to scrutinize or question. This is the only source from my google searches with the latest data. If you find a better more recent reference please update accordingly. For a movie that is running in theaters to not be updated for more than 20 days in in this list is a shame (when we have more recent sources). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdiggin (talk • contribs) 19:58, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mdiggin: We only use sources that have established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy. The mere existence of a website claiming to have expertise is not sufficient to include by default. In this case, I'm not comfortable with this blog or whatever it is. If you want to look for other sources, WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources might be of interest. But the rule of thumb is that we stick to known, mainstream sources. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:09, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

change 3rd highest gossing malayalam film to odiyan.(95 cr) 59.96.255.45 (talk) 18:00, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 18:11, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How can you include Bahubali as highest in Tamil language when it is a Telugu film . Don't fool the world. Change it. Or include Robo2.0 total collections in Telugu tab also. You are hurting the sentiments of Tamil film industry. We will lodge a protest complaint in the TN film chamber of commerce and also take legal advise and file police complaint also. You will be questioned regarding the wiki article. Shiva D Balaji (talk) 18:13, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I second this. Bahubali is a Telugu film, basically. The movie is produced and directed by people working in the Telugu cinema industry. Request to update this. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdiggin (talk • contribs) 11:00, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is an ancient issue that has been discussed at length. Baahubali was filmed in both Telugu and Tamil, which is why it is in the list of highest-grossing Tamil-language films. Note that we're talking about language, not ethnic identity. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:04, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kgf (Kannada) has earned about ₹220crore, please update it.

Reference: https://www.timesnownews.com/entertainment/box-office/article/kgf-all-set-to-beat-baahubali-2-at-the-karnataka-box-office-here-are-some-milestones-achieved-by-yash-starrer/348198

Please update it, as times now is a reliable source 117.192.105.240 (talk) 01:39, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: I don't see "220 crore" in the source provided. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:17, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Update: the last line of the article in the source says ₹219.99 crore, which is more or less 220 crore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.192.105.240 (talk) 11:37, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kgf (Kannada) has earned about ₹220crore, please update it.

Reference: https://www.timesnownews.com/entertainment/box-office/article/kgf-all-set-to-beat-baahubali-2-at-the-karnataka-box-office-here-are-some-milestones-achieved-by-yash-starrer/348198

Please update it, as times now is a reliable source

Note: the last line ie, the last sentence of the source says ₹219.99 crore, which is more or less 220 crore. I do not know how you cannot see it. It's clearly mentioned there

117.192.105.240 (talk) 11:34, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! — Newslinger talk 12:53, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Viswasam Tamil Movie Box office Collection till 21-1-2019 Had Crossed 253Cr Collection. Site Note : https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/tamil/ajith-viswasam-box-office-collection-day-11-5547318/ SankarStark (talk) 14:06, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Source say $250K = $253,809/ 1.81 Crs not 253Cr. :) Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 14:41, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"please change X to Y because in kannada section there should be some changes.A movie Hebbuli collected 50-100 crores here is a very reliable source ". source=https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/hebbuli-s-huge-success-amala-paul-gets-tag-rs-100-crore-actor-61504

             ther are many source which are as follows

source=http://www.kollywoodtoday.net/news/amala-paul-joins-100-crore-club/

source=http://www.kalakaumudi.com/english/film/Amala-Paul-Joins-100-Crore-Club-2017-05-01.php

source=https://www.cinemapolitics.com/list-view.php?title=https://www.cinemapolitics.com/english/amala-paul-in-rs-100-crore-club&nid=797

source=https://uk.blastingnews.com/entertainment/2017/03/hebbuli-12th-13th-day-box-office-collection-at-the-karnataka-bo-001529181.html

source=https://bestoftheyear.in/movie/hebbuli/ Amulya07 (talk) 06:47, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done :) Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 08:32, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove the semi-protected in this page so that everyone ecspecially main editors of Wikipedia may edit the page. Simtaangaran (talk) 08:39, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Simtaangaran: No. For years this article has been the target of financial vandalism, attempts to promote or demote films, used for ethnic-warring, etc. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/regional-cinema/story/petta-box-office-collection-day-16-rajinikanth-film-stays-strong-1438857-2019-01-25

Authorised resource Indiatoday.in- announces Film Petta nearing 250 crores worldwide collection. At the very least this must be registered in the range 200-250 throwing out Vivegam which is presently at Number 10. Request to update. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdiggin (talk • contribs) 12:21, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mdiggin:  Not done Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. We don't make changes based on suppositions and predictions. The article you provided doesn't say what it thinks the total gross is, so picking "200–250" would be a shameful fabrication on our part. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:07, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is a prediction based on facts (seeing it is a reputable source accepted by Wikipedia). And here you are implying that indiatoday fabricates stories. You got to take it easy with such comments. I'm trying to keep this table updated because i like looking at this list. I will get back when i find an updated number for this film. Until then, thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.248.24.122 (talk • contribs)

You appear to be missing the point: We do not update financial figures until it can be demonstrated that the financial figures were achieved. It is common for media outlets to speculate about a film's potential earning power long before a film is released, or along the way, but we'd be foolish to proclaim a film as one of the highest-grossing Indian films if the film hadn't crossed the mark yet. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petta_(film) The wiki page has the updated box office results. Please update the ranking accordingly. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdiggin (talk • contribs) 14:55, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mdiggin: You mean the updated figure that was tweeted by some random cricket and tennis fan on Twitter, instead of a legitimate financial analyst? I think not. The purpose of a secondary source is to get a journalist to check out and vet information they receive. When all they're doing is obviously parroting a garbage source and even presenting the content as though it were a rumour ("It is said..."), there can be no assumption that they've done any actual fact-checking here, and it's yet another example of poor journalism from India's high-pressure "gotta report a higher box office figure" system. Wikipedia has no deadline. We're under no pressure to insanely report every change to box office figures that come out. If it takes a month to get a reliable final box office total for the film, we'll wait. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:00, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Okay. You really think these so called legitimate sources and financial analysts are true to the tee. Well, I'm all for legitimate numbers. Let's wait. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdiggin (talk • contribs) 22:12, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mdiggin: I don't believe any of them are true to a tee, but when they're writing stories based on comments that regular people have written, that's just shitty journalism. Also, please sign your posts by typing four tildes like this ~~~~. This will append your signature and time stamp. It would also be helpful if you'd please indent your replies using colons. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:30, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Update Highest-grossing opening weekends list

The worldwide estimated collection of Petta is Rs 149 crore by the end of its first week.

source - https://www.ibtimes.co.in/petta-box-office-collection-1st-week-here-how-much-rajinikanth-grossed-worldwide-8-days-790266 Prasanna0572 (talk) 10:45, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: @Prasanna0572: That list is a jumble of confusing content and I have flagged it for cleanup. It's absurd that we have Baahubali 2's five-day gross figure that we're calling a "weekend", contrasted with 2.0's seven-day gross, which we're calling a "weekend", and now you want us to consider an eight-day gross figure and call that a "weekend". We need to properly define what a weekend is (I always thought it was Friday, Saturday and Sunday) and adjust the list accordingly. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:33, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Highest-grossing opening weekends table is a bit of a mess and I've flagged it for cleanup accordingly. A film weekend is typically Friday, Saturday and Sunday. You know, like a normal weekend? It becomes problematic when a film releases mid-week. How do we calculate what its "weekend" was? Do we use the literal first weekend, i.e. Friday, Saturday and Sunday figures? Perhaps. If that specific data is available. But what is not logical, is to use four, five, six and seven-day figures as we've done for Baahubali: The Beginning, Baahubali 2, Sarkar, and 2.0 respectively. If the three day weekend data isn't published in a consistent way, I don't know what value this table is ever going to have. Thoughts? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:50, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have made up some changes Wiki KuthiVaiyans (talk) 16:40, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

kindly correct the gross of simmba.it has grossed approximately ₹399.27crore worldwide.so it should be included in this list 139.167.156.232 (talk) 14:56, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:13, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]